EMF vs GUSE

Comparison between Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (EMF, ETF) and GOLDMAN SACHS ENHANCED U.S. EQUITY ETF (GUSE, ETF).

EMF vs GUSE - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	EMF(ETF)	GUSE(ETF)
Net Assets	$341M	$341M
Expense Ratio	N/A	0.30%
Max Drawdown	72.52%	8.54%
Sharpe Ratio	2.48	1.34
5Y Beta	0.70	1.05
P/E Ratio	N/A	28.27
Forward P/E	N/A	21.62
PEG Ratio	N/A	0.55
5Y Dividends CAGR	20.31%	N/A
5Y EPS CAGR	N/A	25.62%
Debt to Equity	N/A	21.47%
P/S Ratio	N/A	3.14
P/B Ratio	N/A	5.07

Net Assets

Winner

EMF

$341M

GUSE

$341M

Expense Ratio

EMF

N/A

GUSE

0.30%

Max Drawdown

EMF

72.52%

Winner

GUSE

8.54%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

EMF

2.48

GUSE

1.34

5Y Beta

Winner

EMF

0.70

GUSE

1.05

P/E Ratio

EMF

N/A

GUSE

28.27

Forward P/E

EMF

N/A

GUSE

21.62

PEG Ratio

EMF

N/A

GUSE

0.55

5Y Dividends CAGR

EMF

20.31%

GUSE

N/A

5Y EPS CAGR

EMF

N/A

GUSE

25.62%

Debt to Equity

EMF

N/A

GUSE

21.47%

P/S Ratio

EMF

N/A

GUSE

3.14

P/B Ratio

EMF

N/A

GUSE

5.07

EMF vs GUSE - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	EMF	GUSE
1 month	+5.04%	+2.44%
3 months	+21.32%	+8.35%
6 months	+38.52%	+8.92%
1 year	+79.58%	N/A
5 years(CAGR)	+10.34%	N/A
10 years(CAGR)	+14.76%	N/A
Max(CAGR)	+9.63%	+23.71%

Winner

EMF

+5.04%

GUSE

+2.44%

Winner

EMF

+21.32%

GUSE

+8.35%

Winner

EMF

+38.52%

GUSE

+8.92%

EMF

+79.58%

GUSE

N/A

5Y(CAGR)

EMF

+10.34%

GUSE

N/A

10Y(CAGR)

EMF

+14.76%

GUSE

N/A

Max(CAGR)

EMF

+9.63%

Winner

GUSE

+23.71%

EMF vs GUSE - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	EMF	GUSE
2026	+32.24%	+8.96%
2025	+57.75%	+2.91%
2024	+4.77%	N/A
2023	+7.70%	N/A
2022	-22.82%	N/A
2021	-8.69%	N/A
2020	+19.61%	N/A
2019	+24.33%	N/A
2018	-17.20%	N/A
2017	+49.63%	N/A
2016	+25.38%	N/A
2015	-26.61%	N/A
2014	-3.63%	N/A
2013	-6.39%	N/A
2012	+10.97%	N/A
2011	-24.67%	N/A
2010	+14.61%	N/A
2009	+110.57%	N/A
2008	-53.32%	N/A
2007	+36.03%	N/A
2006	+17.07%	N/A
2005	+31.79%	N/A
2004	+15.59%	N/A
2003	+81.60%	N/A
2002	-1.16%	N/A
2001	+5.71%	N/A
2000	-43.35%	N/A
1999	+23.27%	N/A

EMF vs GUSE Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for EMF was -68.69%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 549 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for GUSE was -8.54%, occurring on Mar 30, 2026. Recovery took 33 trading sessions.

The current EMF drawdown is -7.10%. The current GUSE drawdown is -2.89%.

Rank	EMF	GUSE
#1	-68.69% Oct 31, 2007 - Jan 6, 2010	-8.54% Feb 25, 2026 - Apr 14, 2026
#2	-50.48% Apr 8, 2011 - Oct 12, 2017	-2.89% Jun 2, 2026 - Jun 5, 2026
#3	-48.89% Jan 3, 2000 - Oct 13, 2003	-2.78% Dec 11, 2025 - Dec 23, 2025
#4	-47.63% Feb 17, 2021 - Aug 13, 2025	-2.77% Jan 12, 2026 - Feb 25, 2026
#5	-39.30% Jan 14, 2020 - Nov 5, 2020	-2.07% Nov 17, 2025 - Nov 24, 2025
#6	-31.38% Jan 19, 2006 - Dec 26, 2006	-2.02% May 14, 2026 - May 26, 2026
#7	-31.32% Jan 13, 2004 - Nov 17, 2004	-1.29% Dec 24, 2025 - Jan 6, 2026
#8	-27.72% Jan 26, 2018 - Jan 2, 2020	-0.95% Apr 17, 2026 - Apr 22, 2026
#9	-26.55% Jan 19, 2010 - Oct 1, 2010	-0.80% Apr 27, 2026 - Apr 30, 2026
#10	-22.38% Jul 23, 2007 - Sep 18, 2007	-0.48% Nov 28, 2025 - Dec 5, 2025
#11	-20.84% Mar 18, 2005 - Jul 28, 2005	-0.48% May 1, 2026 - May 5, 2026
#12	-19.47% Feb 25, 2026 - May 5, 2026	-0.47% Dec 5, 2025 - Dec 10, 2025
#13	-15.59% Jan 3, 2007 - May 22, 2007	-0.46% Jan 6, 2026 - Jan 9, 2026
#14	-11.49% Nov 10, 2010 - Apr 6, 2011	-0.46% May 6, 2026 - May 8, 2026
#15	-11.39% Aug 18, 2005 - Nov 21, 2005	-0.46% Apr 22, 2026 - Apr 24, 2026

Correlation

Correlation between EMF and GUSE is 0.87 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.87

-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

EMF vs GUSE dividend yield comparison.

Year	EMF	GUSE
2026	0.98%	0.00%
2025	9.73%	0.73%
2024	4.28%	0.00%
2023	6.22%	0.00%
2022	9.89%	0.00%
2021	6.92%	0.00%
2020	3.51%	0.00%
2019	7.36%	0.00%
2018	5.92%	0.00%
2017	12.11%	0.00%
2016	1.62%	0.00%
2015	12.81%	0.00%
2014	7.67%	0.00%
2013	9.66%	0.00%
2012	2.30%	0.00%
2011	1.87%	0.00%
2010	0.63%	0.00%
2009	0.72%	0.00%
2008	15.86%	0.00%
2007	9.34%	0.00%
2006	28.68%	0.00%
2005	10.26%	0.00%
2004	1.49%	0.00%
2003	1.61%	0.00%
2002	1.93%	0.00%
2001	1.35%	0.00%
2000	1.35%	0.00%