EINC vs CGO

Comparison between VANECK ENERGY INCOME ETF (EINC, ETF) and Calamos Global Total Return Fund (CGO, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceEINC has outperformed CGO, delivering a return of +19.5% compared to +5.5%

EINC vs CGO - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	EINC(ETF)	CGO(ETF)
Net Assets	$153M	$154M
Expense Ratio	0.46%	N/A
Max Drawdown	93.40%	67.04%
Sharpe Ratio	1.56	1.27
5Y Beta	0.45	0.87
P/E Ratio	21.75	N/A
Forward P/E	17.18	N/A
PEG Ratio	1.06	N/A
5Y Dividends CAGR	17.95%	-2.82%
5Y EPS CAGR	17.27%	N/A
P/S Ratio	1.43	N/A
P/B Ratio	3.38	N/A

Net Assets

EINC

$153M

Winner

CGO

$154M

Expense Ratio

EINC

0.46%

CGO

N/A

Max Drawdown

EINC

93.40%

Winner

CGO

67.04%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

EINC

1.56

CGO

1.27

5Y Beta

Winner

EINC

0.45

CGO

0.87

P/E Ratio

EINC

21.75

CGO

N/A

Forward P/E

EINC

17.18

CGO

N/A

PEG Ratio

EINC

1.06

CGO

N/A

5Y Dividends CAGR

Winner

EINC

17.95%

CGO

-2.82%

5Y EPS CAGR

EINC

17.27%

CGO

N/A

P/S Ratio

EINC

1.43

CGO

N/A

P/B Ratio

EINC

3.38

CGO

N/A

EINC vs CGO - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	EINC	CGO
1 month	-4.75%	+1.05%
3 months	+1.46%	+19.86%
6 months	+23.19%	+25.98%
1 year	+25.49%	+28.70%
5 years(CAGR)	+19.54%	+5.52%
10 years(CAGR)	+11.82%	+12.24%
Max(CAGR)	+0.75%	+8.89%

EINC

-4.75%

Winner

CGO

+1.05%

EINC

+1.46%

Winner

CGO

+19.86%

EINC

+23.19%

Winner

CGO

+25.98%

EINC

+25.49%

Winner

CGO

+28.70%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

EINC

+19.54%

CGO

+5.52%

10Y(CAGR)

EINC

+11.82%

Winner

CGO

+12.24%

Max(CAGR)

EINC

+0.75%

Winner

CGO

+8.89%

EINC vs CGO - Annual Returns (2005 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	EINC	CGO
2026	+21.56%	+22.16%
2025	+5.27%	+8.42%
2024	+42.34%	+37.84%
2023	+18.33%	+13.13%
2022	+17.15%	-36.67%
2021	+38.95%	+13.85%
2020	-20.33%	+19.97%
2019	+14.37%	+42.30%
2018	-22.45%	-26.75%
2017	-5.01%	+55.88%
2016	+25.95%	+4.65%
2015	-58.54%	-4.42%
2014	-25.55%	+3.20%
2013	+12.27%	+11.09%
2012	-7.26%	+7.36%
2011	N/A	+0.18%
2010	N/A	+10.10%
2009	N/A	+57.16%
2008	N/A	-45.30%
2007	N/A	+23.11%
2006	N/A	+28.24%
2005	N/A	-4.84%

EINC vs CGO Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for EINC was -87.58%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 2943 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for CGO was -59.93%, occurring on Oct 9, 2008. Recovery took 734 trading sessions.

The current EINC drawdown is -6.97%. The current CGO drawdown is -3.03%.

Rank	EINC	CGO
#1	-87.58% Aug 29, 2014 - May 14, 2026	-59.93% Dec 7, 2007 - Nov 5, 2010
#2	-14.11% Mar 13, 2012 - Oct 9, 2012	-50.77% Feb 13, 2020 - Aug 28, 2020
#3	-11.70% Oct 18, 2012 - Jan 22, 2013	-43.70% Sep 7, 2021 - Sep 9, 2025
#4	-7.22% May 22, 2026 - May 29, 2026	-34.62% Jan 25, 2018 - Dec 26, 2019
#5	-4.53% May 21, 2013 - Oct 21, 2013	-27.59% Jul 21, 2015 - Feb 24, 2017
#6	-3.60% Nov 4, 2013 - Dec 31, 2013	-22.13% Jul 19, 2007 - Oct 11, 2007
#7	-2.65% Jul 24, 2014 - Aug 20, 2014	-21.55% May 2, 2011 - Mar 29, 2012
#8	-2.59% Jan 29, 2013 - Apr 10, 2013	-16.41% Jul 14, 2014 - Apr 28, 2015
#9	-2.57% Feb 14, 2014 - May 1, 2014	-15.24% Feb 26, 2026 - Apr 17, 2026
#10	-1.99% Jun 2, 2014 - Jun 23, 2014	-15.13% Mar 12, 2013 - Dec 24, 2013
#11	-1.96% Apr 10, 2013 - Apr 22, 2013	-14.31% Apr 2, 2012 - Jan 14, 2013
#12	-1.60% Jun 30, 2014 - Jul 23, 2014	-11.93% Oct 28, 2005 - May 8, 2006
#13	-1.57% May 19, 2026 - May 22, 2026	-10.89% Aug 7, 2017 - Oct 27, 2017
#14	-1.13% Jan 23, 2014 - Feb 7, 2014	-10.14% Sep 19, 2025 - Jan 13, 2026
#15	-0.92% Dec 31, 2013 - Jan 22, 2014	-9.54% Oct 14, 2020 - Nov 9, 2020

Correlation

Correlation between EINC and CGO is -0.01 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.

-0.01

-101

Dividend Comparison (2005 - 2026)

EINC vs CGO dividend yield comparison.

Year	EINC	CGO
2026	1.16%	2.94%
2025	4.51%	8.43%
2024	3.33%	8.43%
2023	3.77%	10.57%
2022	2.89%	12.68%
2021	6.03%	7.80%
2020	6.69%	8.18%
2019	9.66%	8.96%
2018	11.31%	11.81%
2017	8.53%	7.97%
2016	9.71%	11.40%
2015	28.53%	10.51%
2014	12.41%	9.08%
2013	8.90%	8.56%
2012	6.95%	8.73%
2011	0.00%	8.80%
2010	0.00%	8.28%
2009	0.00%	8.36%
2008	0.00%	14.64%
2007	0.00%	6.71%
2006	0.00%	5.88%
2005	0.00%	0.71%