EFT vs EWD
Comparison between Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT, ETF) and ISHARES MSCI SWEDEN ETF (EWD, ETF).
5-Year PerformanceEWD has outperformed EFT, delivering a return of +4.3% compared to +3.4%
EFT vs EWD - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
EFT vs EWD - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
EFT vs EWD - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | EFT | EWD |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -1.19% | +4.13% |
| 2025 | -4.98% | +36.16% |
| 2024 | +10.09% | -1.94% |
| 2023 | +25.67% | +23.68% |
| 2022 | -19.37% | -28.45% |
| 2021 | +21.84% | +21.34% |
| 2020 | +2.02% | +18.94% |
| 2019 | +15.47% | +23.80% |
| 2018 | -6.38% | -13.43% |
| 2017 | +1.03% | +21.04% |
| 2016 | +26.83% | +4.52% |
| 2015 | -3.08% | -3.90% |
| 2014 | -3.45% | -5.97% |
| 2013 | -6.56% | +21.95% |
| 2012 | +25.50% | +19.94% |
| 2011 | -5.17% | -18.22% |
| 2010 | +19.50% | +31.31% |
| 2009 | +82.60% | +48.46% |
| 2008 | -44.31% | -46.58% |
| 2007 | -8.04% | -2.28% |
| 2006 | +17.88% | +38.19% |
| 2005 | -5.07% | +9.32% |
| 2004 | -2.51% | +34.96% |
| 2003 | N/A | +57.95% |
| 2002 | N/A | -31.32% |
| 2001 | N/A | -22.76% |
| 2000 | N/A | -27.76% |
| 1999 | N/A | +27.13% |
EFT vs EWD Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for EFT was -60.58%, occurring on Dec 15, 2008. Recovery took 675 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for EWD was -75.34%, occurring on Oct 9, 2002. Recovery took 1668 trading sessions.
The current EFT drawdown is -10.63%. The current EWD drawdown is -5.61%.
| Rank | EFT | EWD |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -60.58% Jun 25, 2007 - Mar 1, 2010 | -75.34% Mar 3, 2000 - Oct 20, 2006 |
| #2 | -45.43% Jan 22, 2020 - Dec 3, 2020 | -68.10% Jul 12, 2007 - Apr 21, 2011 |
| #3 | -24.97% Jan 12, 2022 - Dec 15, 2023 | -42.26% Aug 13, 2021 - Feb 18, 2025 |
| #4 | -23.47% May 23, 2013 - Nov 11, 2016 | -37.22% Feb 12, 2020 - Jul 17, 2020 |
| #5 | -20.16% Feb 24, 2011 - Mar 21, 2012 | -36.19% May 2, 2011 - Mar 7, 2013 |
| #6 | -17.49% Jan 24, 2025 - Apr 7, 2025 | -25.57% May 21, 2014 - May 2, 2017 |
| #7 | -15.52% Apr 12, 2018 - Dec 16, 2019 | -23.30% Jan 24, 2018 - Jan 2, 2020 |
| #8 | -13.57% Mar 25, 2010 - Oct 21, 2010 | -17.84% Mar 7, 2025 - May 13, 2025 |
| #9 | -10.39% Mar 4, 2005 - Mar 16, 2006 | -14.49% Feb 27, 2026 - Mar 20, 2026 |
| #10 | -9.92% Mar 27, 2012 - Aug 20, 2012 | -12.59% May 21, 2013 - Jul 23, 2013 |
| #11 | -7.83% Oct 25, 2012 - Dec 19, 2012 | -9.09% Feb 26, 2007 - Mar 21, 2007 |
| #12 | -6.75% Jul 27, 2017 - Mar 14, 2018 | -8.75% May 7, 2007 - Jul 6, 2007 |
| #13 | -5.95% Oct 4, 2012 - Oct 25, 2012 | -8.18% Oct 12, 2020 - Nov 6, 2020 |
| #14 | -5.70% Jul 23, 2024 - Nov 7, 2024 | -8.16% Sep 18, 2013 - Dec 30, 2013 |
| #15 | -5.63% Sep 10, 2021 - Jan 10, 2022 | -7.82% Oct 27, 2025 - Dec 10, 2025 |
Correlation
Correlation between EFT and EWD is 0.95 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
EFT vs EWD dividend yield comparison.
| Year | EFT | EWD |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.76% | 0.00% |
| 2025 | 9.55% | 3.27% |
| 2024 | 10.52% | 1.77% |
| 2023 | 11.09% | 2.41% |
| 2022 | 9.81% | 3.68% |
| 2021 | 5.24% | 5.46% |
| 2020 | 5.88% | 0.98% |
| 2019 | 7.41% | 4.15% |
| 2018 | 6.77% | 5.17% |
| 2017 | 5.73% | 3.23% |
| 2016 | 5.54% | 3.91% |
| 2015 | 6.57% | 4.08% |
| 2014 | 5.82% | 3.92% |
| 2013 | 6.62% | 3.47% |
| 2012 | 5.62% | 3.03% |
| 2011 | 7.17% | 4.13% |
| 2010 | 5.85% | 1.77% |
| 2009 | 6.02% | 2.13% |
| 2008 | 15.12% | 8.23% |
| 2007 | 9.97% | 3.61% |
| 2006 | 8.47% | 1.05% |
| 2005 | 7.46% | 1.85% |
| 2004 | 2.45% | 0.70% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 1.58% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 1.28% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 0.35% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 30.15% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 3.42% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks