EEM vs LQD
Comparison between ISHARES MSCI EMERGING MARKETS ETF (EEM, ETF) and ISHARES IBOXX $ INVESTMENT GRADE CORPORATE BOND ETF (LQD, ETF).
5-Year PerformanceEEM has outperformed LQD, delivering a return of +5.9% compared to -0.2%
EEM vs LQD - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
Net Assets
Winner
EEM
$30B
LQD
$30B
Expense Ratio
EEM
0.72%
Winner
LQD
0.14%
Max Drawdown
EEM
67.23%
Winner
LQD
30.46%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
EEM
1.66
LQD
0.26
5Y Beta
EEM
0.83
Winner
LQD
0.14
5Y Dividends CAGR
EEM
2.97%
Winner
LQD
7.94%
EEM vs LQD - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
1M
EEM
-3.22%
Winner
LQD
-0.67%
3M
Winner
EEM
+12.49%
LQD
-1.33%
6M
Winner
EEM
+22.11%
LQD
-0.06%
1Y
Winner
EEM
+42.30%
LQD
+5.41%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
EEM
+5.93%
LQD
-0.21%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
EEM
+8.97%
LQD
+2.44%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
EEM
+10.00%
LQD
+4.46%
EEM vs LQD - Annual Returns (2002 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | EEM | LQD |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +16.91% | -0.03% |
| 2025 | +34.17% | +7.89% |
| 2024 | +7.76% | +1.55% |
| 2023 | +8.08% | +8.65% |
| 2022 | -21.12% | -17.05% |
| 2021 | -4.23% | -1.34% |
| 2020 | +14.71% | +10.74% |
| 2019 | +17.90% | +17.00% |
| 2018 | -16.88% | -3.14% |
| 2017 | +35.65% | +6.96% |
| 2016 | +13.99% | +6.27% |
| 2015 | -15.06% | -1.60% |
| 2014 | -0.08% | +8.00% |
| 2013 | -5.57% | -2.22% |
| 2012 | +15.57% | +10.67% |
| 2011 | -19.59% | +9.31% |
| 2010 | +13.21% | +8.75% |
| 2009 | +61.25% | +9.58% |
| 2008 | -48.03% | +1.20% |
| 2007 | +32.18% | +3.95% |
| 2006 | +26.46% | +3.65% |
| 2005 | +34.01% | +0.51% |
| 2004 | +21.91% | +6.48% |
| 2003 | +63.14% | +8.29% |
| 2002 | N/A | +9.86% |
EEM vs LQD Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for EEM was -66.45%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 2488 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for LQD was -24.96%, occurring on Oct 20, 2022. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current EEM drawdown is -7.13%. The current LQD drawdown is -4.23%.
| Rank | EEM | LQD |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -66.45% Oct 31, 2007 - Sep 19, 2017 | -24.96% Sep 22, 2021 - Oct 20, 2022 |
| #2 | -39.80% Feb 17, 2021 - Sep 11, 2025 | -21.76% Mar 6, 2020 - Jun 10, 2020 |
| #3 | -38.22% Jan 26, 2018 - Nov 24, 2020 | -21.54% May 1, 2008 - Jan 9, 2009 |
| #4 | -26.24% May 9, 2006 - Dec 4, 2006 | -10.86% Jan 9, 2009 - Jun 25, 2009 |
| #5 | -21.38% Apr 12, 2004 - Nov 4, 2004 | -8.70% Jun 13, 2003 - Mar 5, 2004 |
| #6 | -17.73% Jul 23, 2007 - Sep 21, 2007 | -8.57% May 1, 2013 - May 1, 2014 |
| #7 | -13.52% Feb 25, 2026 - Apr 17, 2026 | -7.66% Mar 17, 2004 - Sep 16, 2004 |
| #8 | -12.02% Oct 3, 2005 - Dec 1, 2005 | -6.64% Dec 31, 2020 - Aug 3, 2021 |
| #9 | -11.97% Mar 7, 2005 - Jul 12, 2005 | -6.03% Feb 2, 2015 - Apr 1, 2016 |
| #10 | -11.25% Feb 21, 2007 - Apr 3, 2007 | -5.86% Sep 6, 2016 - Jun 14, 2017 |
| #11 | -8.77% Jun 2, 2026 - Jun 5, 2026 | -5.63% Dec 29, 2017 - Mar 12, 2019 |
| #12 | -8.02% Jan 31, 2006 - Apr 3, 2006 | -5.23% Nov 4, 2010 - May 5, 2011 |
| #13 | -7.27% Mar 1, 2004 - Apr 2, 2004 | -4.85% Aug 31, 2005 - Sep 19, 2006 |
| #14 | -5.94% Jan 3, 2007 - Jan 24, 2007 | -4.66% Nov 4, 2011 - Jan 17, 2012 |
| #15 | -5.72% Aug 10, 2005 - Sep 6, 2005 | -4.34% Sep 27, 2002 - Nov 7, 2002 |
Correlation
Correlation between EEM and LQD is 0.84 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
0.84
-101
Dividend Comparison (2002 - 2026)
EEM vs LQD dividend yield comparison.
| Year | EEM | LQD |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.00% | 1.92% |
| 2025 | 2.22% | 4.48% |
| 2024 | 2.43% | 4.45% |
| 2023 | 2.63% | 3.99% |
| 2022 | 2.50% | 3.30% |
| 2021 | 1.99% | 2.30% |
| 2020 | 1.45% | 2.66% |
| 2019 | 2.76% | 3.29% |
| 2018 | 2.24% | 3.67% |
| 2017 | 1.88% | 3.10% |
| 2016 | 1.89% | 3.34% |
| 2015 | 2.49% | 3.47% |
| 2014 | 2.23% | 3.39% |
| 2013 | 2.05% | 3.83% |
| 2012 | 1.68% | 3.83% |
| 2011 | 2.13% | 4.39% |
| 2010 | 1.36% | 4.87% |
| 2009 | 1.40% | 5.50% |
| 2008 | 3.43% | 5.37% |
| 2007 | 1.30% | 5.45% |
| 2006 | 1.38% | 5.04% |
| 2005 | 1.12% | 4.76% |
| 2004 | 1.20% | 4.66% |
| 2003 | 0.50% | 4.96% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 2.26% |
Select Stocks to Compare
Popular: EEM vs SPYLQD vs SPY
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks
Compare EEM with:
Compare LQD with:
Popular suggestions:
EEM vs VWO
ISHARES MSCI EMERGING MARKETS ETF vs VANGUARD EMERGING MARKETS STOCK INDEX FUND ETF SHARES
HYG vs LQD
ISHARES IBOXX $ HIGH YIELD CORPORATE BOND ETF vs ISHARES IBOXX $ INVESTMENT GRADE CORPORATE BOND ETF
IEMG vs EEM
ISHARES CORE MSCI EMERGING MARKETS ETF vs ISHARES MSCI EMERGING MARKETS ETF
LQDW vs LQD
ISHARES INVESTMENT GRADE CORPORATE BOND BUYWRITE STRATEGY ETF vs ISHARES IBOXX $ INVESTMENT GRADE CORPORATE BOND ETF
URTH vs EEM
ISHARES MSCI WORLD ETF vs ISHARES MSCI EMERGING MARKETS ETF
EDC vs EEM
Direxion Daily Emerging Markets Bull 3X Shares vs ISHARES MSCI EMERGING MARKETS ETF
EEM vs SPEM
ISHARES MSCI EMERGING MARKETS ETF vs STATE STREET(R) SPDR(R) PORTFOLIO EMERGING MARKETS ETF
LQIG vs LQD
State Street SPDR MarketAxess Investment Grade 400 Corporate Bond ETF vs ISHARES IBOXX $ INVESTMENT GRADE CORPORATE BOND ETF
LQDI vs LQD
ISHARES INFLATION HEDGED CORPORATE BOND ETF vs ISHARES IBOXX $ INVESTMENT GRADE CORPORATE BOND ETF
IEF vs LQD
ISHARES 7-10 YEAR TREASURY BOND ETF vs ISHARES IBOXX $ INVESTMENT GRADE CORPORATE BOND ETF
EEMV vs EEM
ISHARES MSCI EMERGING MARKETS MIN VOL FACTOR ETF vs ISHARES MSCI EMERGING MARKETS ETF
EEMS vs EEM
ISHARES MSCI EMERGING MARKETS SMALL-CAP ETF vs ISHARES MSCI EMERGING MARKETS ETF