EEFT vs HCM

Comparison between Euronet Worldwide Inc (EEFT, Company) and HUTCHMED (China) Ltd (HCM, Company).

EEFT is from the Technology sector, while HCM is from the Healthcare sector.

5-Year PerformanceEEFT has outperformed HCM, delivering a return of -15.6% compared to -18.5%

EEFT vs HCM - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	EEFT(COMPANY)	HCM(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$2.49B	$2.50B
Max Drawdown	81.21%	82.18%
Sharpe Ratio	-1.57	-1.14
5Y Beta	1.04	0.78
Industry	Software - Infrastructure	Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
P/E Ratio	8.92	5.36
Forward P/E	6.05	40.82
PEG Ratio	0.47	0.00
5Y EPS CAGR	5.04%	N/A
Debt to Equity	210.90%	7.60%
Free Cash Flow Yield	12.25%	-1.99%
P/S Ratio	0.58	4.42
P/B Ratio	2.06	2.25

Market Cap

EEFT

$2.49B

Winner

HCM

$2.50B

Max Drawdown

Winner

EEFT

81.21%

HCM

82.18%

Sharpe Ratio

EEFT

-1.57

Winner

HCM

-1.14

5Y Beta

EEFT

1.04

Winner

HCM

0.78

Industry

EEFT

Software - Infrastructure

HCM

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic

P/E Ratio

EEFT

8.92

Winner

HCM

5.36

Forward P/E

Winner

EEFT

6.05

HCM

40.82

PEG Ratio

EEFT

0.47

Winner

HCM

0.00

5Y EPS CAGR

EEFT

5.04%

HCM

N/A

Debt to Equity

EEFT

210.90%

Winner

HCM

7.60%

Free Cash Flow Yield

Winner

EEFT

12.25%

HCM

-1.99%

P/S Ratio

Winner

EEFT

0.58

HCM

4.42

P/B Ratio

Winner

EEFT

2.06

HCM

2.25

EEFT vs HCM - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	EEFT	HCM
1 month	-4.74%	-13.50%
3 months	-8.00%	-22.76%
6 months	-15.09%	-18.33%
1 year	-40.55%	-38.15%
5 years(CAGR)	-15.63%	-18.53%
10 years(CAGR)	-1.53%	-2.00%
Max(CAGR)	+12.27%	-1.94%

Winner

EEFT

-4.74%

HCM

-13.50%

Winner

EEFT

-8.00%

HCM

-22.76%

Winner

EEFT

-15.09%

HCM

-18.33%

EEFT

-40.55%

Winner

HCM

-38.15%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

EEFT

-15.63%

HCM

-18.53%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

EEFT

-1.53%

HCM

-2.00%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

EEFT

+12.27%

HCM

-1.94%

EEFT vs HCM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	EEFT	HCM
2026	-10.04%	-19.71%
2025	-24.71%	-11.60%
2024	+2.24%	-17.70%
2023	+5.56%	+10.56%
2022	-22.35%	-58.54%
2021	-15.27%	+3.06%
2020	-8.65%	+21.15%
2019	+55.14%	+9.96%
2018	+20.22%	-43.87%
2017	+15.34%	+163.68%
2016	+3.50%	+1.27%
2015	+33.86%	N/A
2014	+15.46%	N/A
2013	+100.04%	N/A
2012	+22.92%	N/A
2011	+5.60%	N/A
2010	-22.66%	N/A
2009	+81.86%	N/A
2008	-60.36%	N/A
2007	-0.27%	N/A
2006	+4.87%	N/A
2005	+9.88%	N/A
2004	+40.12%	N/A
2003	+132.49%	N/A
2002	-57.21%	N/A
2001	+302.22%	N/A
2000	-34.71%	N/A
1999	+146.91%	N/A

EEFT vs HCM Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for EEFT was -81.21%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 1896 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for HCM was -82.18%, occurring on Oct 25, 2022. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current EEFT drawdown is -60.84%. The current HCM drawdown is -74.48%.

Rank	EEFT	HCM
#1	-81.21% Mar 20, 2006 - Sep 30, 2013	-82.18% Aug 9, 2021 - Oct 25, 2022
#2	-79.22% Jan 28, 2002 - May 19, 2004	-63.07% Jan 2, 2018 - Jul 21, 2021
#3	-62.39% Jul 10, 2019 - Jun 10, 2026	-20.59% Jun 15, 2016 - Dec 2, 2016
#4	-62.37% Mar 31, 2000 - Jul 23, 2001	-14.78% Jan 3, 2017 - Mar 13, 2017
#5	-39.29% Aug 23, 2001 - Oct 16, 2001	-14.57% Nov 16, 2017 - Dec 22, 2017
#6	-34.02% Jun 25, 2004 - Nov 30, 2004	-14.55% Aug 8, 2017 - Oct 2, 2017
#7	-29.41% Nov 6, 2015 - Oct 3, 2016	-13.03% Jul 22, 2021 - Jul 30, 2021
#8	-28.75% Oct 23, 2017 - Sep 12, 2018	-12.01% Oct 11, 2017 - Oct 27, 2017
#9	-26.67% Dec 18, 2013 - Jul 1, 2014	-11.04% Mar 30, 2017 - May 17, 2017
#10	-25.83% Feb 15, 2000 - Mar 27, 2000	-10.72% May 6, 2016 - Jun 8, 2016
#11	-22.99% Dec 3, 2014 - Apr 22, 2015	-9.17% Dec 6, 2016 - Jan 3, 2017
#12	-20.67% Dec 31, 1999 - Feb 14, 2000	-8.91% Mar 15, 2017 - Mar 30, 2017
#13	-20.58% Sep 16, 2005 - Jan 30, 2006	-7.54% Apr 20, 2016 - May 6, 2016
#14	-19.98% Dec 3, 2018 - Feb 8, 2019	-7.09% Oct 27, 2017 - Nov 15, 2017
#15	-18.82% Dec 1, 1999 - Dec 6, 1999	-6.74% Jul 5, 2017 - Aug 3, 2017