EAT vs SANM

Comparison between Brinker International Inc (EAT, Company) and Sanmina Corp (SANM, Company).

EAT is from the Consumer Cyclical sector, while SANM is from the Technology sector.

5-Year PerformanceSANM has outperformed EAT, delivering a return of +36.7% compared to +31.0%

EAT vs SANM - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	EAT(COMPANY)	SANM(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$8.83B	$8.83B
Max Drawdown	88.76%	99.66%
Sharpe Ratio	0.72	1.01
5Y Beta	1.11	1.53
Industry	Restaurants	Electronic Components
P/E Ratio	19.46	26.91
Forward P/E	16.72	15.08
PEG Ratio	0.47	0.62
5Y Dividends CAGR	7.56%	N/A
5Y EPS CAGR	134.57%	21.35%
Debt to Equity	0.00%	78.72%
Free Cash Flow Yield	5.71%	6.73%

Market Cap

Winner

EAT

$8.83B

SANM

$8.83B

Max Drawdown

Winner

EAT

88.76%

SANM

99.66%

Sharpe Ratio

EAT

0.72

Winner

SANM

1.01

5Y Beta

Winner

EAT

1.11

SANM

1.53

Industry

EAT

Restaurants

SANM

Electronic Components

P/E Ratio

Winner

EAT

19.46

SANM

26.91

Forward P/E

EAT

16.72

Winner

SANM

15.08

PEG Ratio

Winner

EAT

0.47

SANM

0.62

5Y Dividends CAGR

EAT

7.56%

SANM

N/A

5Y EPS CAGR

Winner

EAT

134.57%

SANM

21.35%

Debt to Equity

Winner

EAT

0.00%

SANM

78.72%

Free Cash Flow Yield

EAT

5.71%

Winner

SANM

6.73%

EAT vs SANM - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	EAT	SANM
1 month	+24.98%	-27.50%
3 months	+37.92%	-15.77%
6 months	+33.13%	+29.50%
1 year	+26.57%	+58.31%
5 years(CAGR)	+31.05%	+36.72%
10 years(CAGR)	+17.69%	+21.89%
Max(CAGR)	+13.55%	+1.16%

Winner

EAT

+24.98%

SANM

-27.50%

Winner

EAT

+37.92%

SANM

-15.77%

Winner

EAT

+33.13%

SANM

+29.50%

EAT

+26.57%

Winner

SANM

+58.31%

5Y(CAGR)

EAT

+31.05%

Winner

SANM

+36.72%

10Y(CAGR)

EAT

+17.69%

Winner

SANM

+21.89%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

EAT

+13.55%

SANM

+1.16%

EAT vs SANM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	EAT	SANM
2026	+38.57%	+15.19%
2025	+4.25%	+98.85%
2024	+214.45%	+50.11%
2023	+33.19%	-9.51%
2022	-15.29%	+36.31%
2021	-31.71%	+30.83%
2020	+35.41%	-7.97%
2019	-2.94%	+42.37%
2018	+15.34%	-27.75%
2017	-17.84%	-8.84%
2016	+7.61%	+79.66%
2015	-16.52%	-11.94%
2014	+31.31%	+43.13%
2013	+48.16%	+48.18%
2012	+20.09%	+14.72%
2011	+28.59%	-23.50%
2010	+46.71%	-0.61%
2009	+37.16%	+267.67%
2008	-42.24%	-73.60%
2007	-32.98%	-47.55%
2006	+19.92%	-21.23%
2005	+11.06%	-48.05%
2004	+6.11%	-32.56%
2003	+1.72%	+179.38%
2002	+9.73%	-77.83%
2001	+24.21%	-42.06%
2000	+79.79%	+54.46%
1999	+4.05%	+11.13%

EAT vs SANM Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for EAT was -88.40%, occurring on Nov 21, 2008. Recovery took 1304 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for SANM was -99.66%, occurring on Mar 5, 2009. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current SANM drawdown is -48.17%.

Rank	EAT	SANM
#1	-88.40% Feb 20, 2007 - Apr 23, 2012	-99.66% Aug 31, 2000 - Mar 5, 2009
#2	-85.67% Feb 19, 2015 - Dec 9, 2020	-27.01% Mar 31, 2000 - Jun 1, 2000
#3	-71.67% Mar 15, 2021 - Sep 23, 2024	-17.15% Jul 20, 2000 - Aug 7, 2000
#4	-45.92% Feb 3, 2025 - Jul 13, 2026	-15.12% Dec 13, 1999 - Jan 20, 2000
#5	-30.45% Mar 9, 2001 - Jan 7, 2002	-13.82% Mar 17, 2000 - Mar 31, 2000
#6	-29.14% Mar 6, 2002 - Jun 3, 2003	-10.91% Nov 11, 1999 - Dec 13, 1999
#7	-25.79% Mar 17, 2006 - Oct 24, 2006	-9.73% Aug 10, 2000 - Aug 31, 2000
#8	-25.42% Mar 5, 2004 - Jun 9, 2005	-9.23% Mar 9, 2000 - Mar 17, 2000
#9	-25.13% May 16, 2000 - Oct 9, 2000	-8.68% Jan 25, 2000 - Feb 3, 2000
#10	-23.80% Jan 20, 2000 - Mar 16, 2000	-6.56% Feb 8, 2000 - Feb 24, 2000
#11	-20.21% Sep 10, 2012 - Mar 8, 2013	-6.46% Feb 24, 2000 - Mar 9, 2000
#12	-19.91% Jul 8, 2003 - Feb 12, 2004	-5.47% Jul 3, 2000 - Jul 6, 2000
#13	-18.97% Feb 28, 2014 - Oct 30, 2014	-4.87% Aug 7, 2000 - Aug 10, 2000
#14	-18.62% Nov 15, 1999 - Jan 10, 2000	-4.83% Jun 5, 2000 - Jun 9, 2000
#15	-17.70% Dec 4, 2000 - Feb 16, 2001	-4.73% Jun 20, 2000 - Jun 26, 2000