EAT vs COGT

Comparison between Brinker International Inc (EAT, Company) and Cogent Biosciences Inc (COGT, Company).

EAT is from the Consumer Cyclical sector, while COGT is from the Healthcare sector.

5-Year PerformanceCOGT has outperformed EAT, delivering a return of +31.0% compared to +16.6%

EAT vs COGT - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	EAT(COMPANY)	COGT(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$5.63B	$5.62B
Max Drawdown	88.76%	98.09%
Sharpe Ratio	-0.12	1.84
5Y Beta	1.17	1.78
Industry	Restaurants	Biotechnology
P/E Ratio	12.39	-13.54
Forward P/E	11.29	N/A
PEG Ratio	0.30	-63.94
5Y Dividends CAGR	7.56%	N/A
5Y EPS CAGR	134.57%	-15.32%
Debt to Equity	0.00%	36.72%
Free Cash Flow Yield	8.97%	-5.09%

Market Cap

Winner

EAT

$5.63B

COGT

$5.62B

Max Drawdown

Winner

EAT

88.76%

COGT

98.09%

Sharpe Ratio

EAT

-0.12

Winner

COGT

1.84

5Y Beta

Winner

EAT

1.17

COGT

1.78

Industry

EAT

Restaurants

COGT

Biotechnology

P/E Ratio

EAT

12.39

Winner

COGT

-13.54

Forward P/E

EAT

11.29

COGT

N/A

PEG Ratio

EAT

0.30

Winner

COGT

-63.94

5Y Dividends CAGR

EAT

7.56%

COGT

N/A

5Y EPS CAGR

Winner

EAT

134.57%

COGT

-15.32%

Debt to Equity

Winner

EAT

0.00%

COGT

36.72%

Free Cash Flow Yield

Winner

EAT

8.97%

COGT

-5.09%

EAT vs COGT - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	EAT	COGT
1 month	-17.17%	-11.01%
3 months	-10.50%	-11.82%
6 months	+3.15%	-5.12%
1 year	-12.62%	+520.06%
5 years(CAGR)	+16.57%	+31.02%
10 years(CAGR)	+13.04%	-3.62%
Max(CAGR)	+11.65%	-3.62%

EAT

-17.17%

Winner

COGT

-11.01%

Winner

EAT

-10.50%

COGT

-11.82%

Winner

EAT

+3.15%

COGT

-5.12%

EAT

-12.62%

Winner

COGT

+520.06%

5Y(CAGR)

EAT

+16.57%

Winner

COGT

+31.02%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

EAT

+13.04%

COGT

-3.62%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

EAT

+11.65%

COGT

-3.62%

EAT vs COGT - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	EAT	COGT
2026	-13.45%	-5.22%
2025	+4.25%	+355.38%
2024	+214.45%	+25.00%
2023	+33.19%	-46.88%
2022	-15.29%	+32.87%
2021	-31.71%	-30.24%
2020	+35.41%	+288.85%
2019	-2.94%	-83.89%
2018	+15.34%	-60.40%
2017	-17.84%	N/A
2016	+7.61%	N/A
2015	-16.52%	N/A
2014	+31.31%	N/A
2013	+48.16%	N/A
2012	+20.09%	N/A
2011	+28.59%	N/A
2010	+46.71%	N/A
2009	+37.16%	N/A
2008	-42.24%	N/A
2007	-32.98%	N/A
2006	+19.92%	N/A
2005	+11.06%	N/A
2004	+6.11%	N/A
2003	+1.72%	N/A
2002	+9.73%	N/A
2001	+24.21%	N/A
2000	+79.79%	N/A
1999	+4.05%	N/A

EAT vs COGT Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for EAT was -88.40%, occurring on Nov 21, 2008. Recovery took 1304 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for COGT was -98.09%, occurring on Mar 16, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current EAT drawdown is -30.67%. The current COGT drawdown is -50.92%.

Rank	EAT	COGT
#1	-88.40% Feb 20, 2007 - Apr 23, 2012	-98.09% Jul 31, 2018 - Mar 16, 2020
#2	-85.67% Feb 19, 2015 - Dec 9, 2020	-14.94% Apr 23, 2018 - May 31, 2018
#3	-71.67% Mar 15, 2021 - Sep 23, 2024	-14.54% Jul 13, 2018 - Jul 31, 2018
#4	-45.92% Feb 3, 2025 - Nov 6, 2025	-11.18% Jun 20, 2018 - Jul 13, 2018
#5	-30.45% Mar 9, 2001 - Jan 7, 2002	-10.98% Jun 5, 2018 - Jun 18, 2018
#6	-29.14% Mar 6, 2002 - Jun 3, 2003	-3.42% Mar 29, 2018 - Apr 12, 2018
#7	-25.79% Mar 17, 2006 - Oct 24, 2006	-0.17% Apr 18, 2018 - Apr 23, 2018
#8	-25.42% Mar 5, 2004 - Jun 9, 2005	N/A
#9	-25.13% May 16, 2000 - Oct 9, 2000	N/A
#10	-23.80% Jan 20, 2000 - Mar 16, 2000	N/A
#11	-20.21% Sep 10, 2012 - Mar 8, 2013	N/A
#12	-19.91% Jul 8, 2003 - Feb 12, 2004	N/A
#13	-18.97% Feb 28, 2014 - Oct 30, 2014	N/A
#14	-18.62% Nov 15, 1999 - Jan 10, 2000	N/A
#15	-17.70% Dec 4, 2000 - Feb 16, 2001	N/A