EAT vs CHDN
Comparison between Brinker International Inc (EAT, Company) and Churchill Downs Inc (CHDN, Company).
Both EAT and CHDN are from the Consumer Cyclical sector.
5-Year PerformanceEAT has outperformed CHDN, delivering a return of +19.9% compared to -2.0%
EAT vs CHDN - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
EAT vs CHDN - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
EAT vs CHDN - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | EAT | CHDN |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -6.36% | -19.81% |
| 2025 | +4.25% | -13.20% |
| 2024 | +214.45% | +0.03% |
| 2023 | +33.19% | +28.78% |
| 2022 | -15.29% | -10.37% |
| 2021 | -31.71% | +28.24% |
| 2020 | +35.41% | +43.94% |
| 2019 | -2.94% | +70.53% |
| 2018 | +15.34% | +3.10% |
| 2017 | -17.84% | +57.50% |
| 2016 | +7.61% | +11.55% |
| 2015 | -16.52% | +52.52% |
| 2014 | +31.31% | +7.39% |
| 2013 | +48.16% | +31.02% |
| 2012 | +20.09% | +32.17% |
| 2011 | +28.59% | +18.78% |
| 2010 | +46.71% | +13.80% |
| 2009 | +37.16% | -8.06% |
| 2008 | -42.24% | -22.35% |
| 2007 | -32.98% | +29.83% |
| 2006 | +19.92% | +12.93% |
| 2005 | +11.06% | -14.62% |
| 2004 | +6.11% | +24.52% |
| 2003 | +1.72% | -3.72% |
| 2002 | +9.73% | +10.56% |
| 2001 | +24.21% | +32.77% |
| 2000 | +79.79% | +33.29% |
| 1999 | +4.05% | +10.39% |
EAT vs CHDN Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for EAT was -88.40%, occurring on Nov 21, 2008. Recovery took 1304 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for CHDN was -62.86%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 121 trading sessions.
The current EAT drawdown is -24.99%. The current CHDN drawdown is -39.17%.
| Rank | EAT | CHDN |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -88.40% Feb 20, 2007 - Apr 23, 2012 | -62.86% Feb 19, 2020 - Aug 11, 2020 |
| #2 | -85.67% Feb 19, 2015 - Dec 9, 2020 | -60.50% Dec 24, 2007 - Jan 24, 2012 |
| #3 | -71.67% Mar 15, 2021 - Sep 23, 2024 | -43.72% May 1, 2023 - May 26, 2026 |
| #4 | -45.92% Feb 3, 2025 - Nov 6, 2025 | -32.98% Aug 2, 2005 - Apr 17, 2007 |
| #5 | -30.45% Mar 9, 2001 - Jan 7, 2002 | -32.22% Oct 18, 2021 - Mar 31, 2023 |
| #6 | -29.14% Mar 6, 2002 - Jun 3, 2003 | -30.29% Mar 12, 2021 - Oct 14, 2021 |
| #7 | -25.79% Mar 17, 2006 - Oct 24, 2006 | -27.54% Feb 28, 2002 - Nov 4, 2004 |
| #8 | -25.42% Mar 5, 2004 - Jun 9, 2005 | -27.42% Dec 12, 2000 - Dec 28, 2001 |
| #9 | -25.13% May 16, 2000 - Oct 9, 2000 | -27.25% May 21, 2018 - Jun 5, 2019 |
| #10 | -23.80% Jan 20, 2000 - Mar 16, 2000 | -20.78% Nov 6, 2015 - Sep 8, 2016 |
| #11 | -20.21% Sep 10, 2012 - Mar 8, 2013 | -20.61% Dec 1, 2004 - Jul 29, 2005 |
| #12 | -19.91% Jul 8, 2003 - Feb 12, 2004 | -19.77% Feb 3, 2000 - Mar 31, 2000 |
| #13 | -18.97% Feb 28, 2014 - Oct 30, 2014 | -18.81% Nov 19, 1999 - Dec 22, 1999 |
| #14 | -18.62% Nov 15, 1999 - Jan 10, 2000 | -17.78% Mar 31, 2000 - Oct 13, 2000 |
| #15 | -17.70% Dec 4, 2000 - Feb 16, 2001 | -17.68% Sep 2, 2020 - Nov 9, 2020 |
Correlation
Correlation between EAT and CHDN is 0.65 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2025)
EAT vs CHDN dividend yield comparison.
| Year | EAT | CHDN |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.00% | 0.38% |
| 2024 | 0.00% | 0.31% |
| 2023 | 0.00% | 0.28% |
| 2022 | 0.00% | 0.34% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 0.28% |
| 2020 | 0.67% | 0.32% |
| 2019 | 3.62% | 0.42% |
| 2018 | 3.46% | 0.67% |
| 2017 | 3.71% | 0.65% |
| 2016 | 2.67% | 0.88% |
| 2015 | 2.50% | 0.81% |
| 2014 | 1.77% | 1.05% |
| 2013 | 1.90% | 0.97% |
| 2012 | 2.32% | 1.08% |
| 2011 | 2.24% | 1.15% |
| 2010 | 2.54% | 1.15% |
| 2009 | 2.95% | 1.34% |
| 2008 | 4.17% | 1.24% |
| 2007 | 1.94% | 0.93% |
| 2006 | 0.86% | 1.17% |
| 2005 | 0.26% | 1.36% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 1.12% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 1.37% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 1.31% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 1.35% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 1.68% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 19.95% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks