DXCM vs TPR

Comparison between Dexcom Inc (DXCM, Company) and Tapestry Inc (TPR, Company).

DXCM is from the Healthcare sector, while TPR is from the Consumer Cyclical sector.

5-Year PerformanceTPR has outperformed DXCM, delivering a return of +28.7% compared to -3.7%

DXCM vs TPR - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	DXCM(COMPANY)	TPR(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$28B	$27B
Max Drawdown	94.61%	86.61%
Sharpe Ratio	-0.38	1.38
5Y Beta	0.84	1.25
Industry	Medical Devices	Luxury Goods
P/E Ratio	29.79	40.91
Forward P/E	23.70	17.76
PEG Ratio	0.39	N/A
Dividend Yield	N/A	1.18%
5Y EPS CAGR	9.47%	22.17%
Debt to Equity	0.00%	351.20%
Free Cash Flow Yield	5.18%	6.39%

Market Cap

Winner

DXCM

$28B

TPR

$27B

Max Drawdown

DXCM

94.61%

Winner

TPR

86.61%

Sharpe Ratio

DXCM

-0.38

Winner

TPR

1.38

5Y Beta

Winner

DXCM

0.84

TPR

1.25

Industry

DXCM

Medical Devices

TPR

Luxury Goods

P/E Ratio

Winner

DXCM

29.79

TPR

40.91

Forward P/E

DXCM

23.70

Winner

TPR

17.76

PEG Ratio

DXCM

0.39

TPR

N/A

Dividend Yield

DXCM

N/A

TPR

1.18%

5Y EPS CAGR

DXCM

9.47%

Winner

TPR

22.17%

Debt to Equity

Winner

DXCM

0.00%

TPR

351.20%

Free Cash Flow Yield

DXCM

5.18%

Winner

TPR

6.39%

DXCM vs TPR - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	DXCM	TPR
1 month	+10.55%	-11.60%
3 months	-2.24%	-13.32%
6 months	+22.29%	+33.72%
1 year	-18.20%	+66.95%
5 years(CAGR)	-3.66%	+28.73%
10 years(CAGR)	+16.18%	+16.35%
Max(CAGR)	+16.33%	+18.93%

Winner

DXCM

+10.55%

TPR

-11.60%

Winner

DXCM

-2.24%

TPR

-13.32%

DXCM

+22.29%

Winner

TPR

+33.72%

DXCM

-18.20%

Winner

TPR

+66.95%

5Y(CAGR)

DXCM

-3.66%

Winner

TPR

+28.73%

10Y(CAGR)

DXCM

+16.18%

Winner

TPR

+16.35%

Max(CAGR)

DXCM

+16.33%

Winner

TPR

+18.93%

DXCM vs TPR - Annual Returns (2000 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	DXCM	TPR
2026	+7.36%	+5.50%
2025	-15.45%	+97.86%
2024	-36.82%	+76.32%
2023	+8.16%	-1.76%
2022	-13.02%	-3.84%
2021	+50.10%	+25.65%
2020	+68.53%	+17.16%
2019	+89.91%	-17.69%
2018	+106.59%	-23.88%
2017	-1.48%	+28.64%
2016	-23.94%	+7.81%
2015	+50.25%	-8.74%
2014	+58.42%	-30.49%
2013	+155.67%	+4.30%
2012	+43.96%	-5.89%
2011	-32.09%	+13.45%
2010	+59.46%	+54.22%
2009	+192.39%	+67.14%
2008	-69.16%	-32.01%
2007	-10.63%	-30.21%
2006	-32.00%	+29.01%
2005	+27.09%	+21.02%
2004	N/A	+52.68%
2003	N/A	+123.84%
2002	N/A	+73.49%
2001	N/A	+49.17%
2000	N/A	+46.54%

DXCM vs TPR Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for DXCM was -94.61%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 1828 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for TPR was -82.56%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 3181 trading sessions.

The current DXCM drawdown is -56.12%. The current TPR drawdown is -15.16%.

Rank	DXCM	TPR
#1	-94.61% May 4, 2006 - Aug 8, 2013	-82.56% Mar 26, 2012 - Nov 14, 2024
#2	-66.32% Nov 17, 2021 - Nov 10, 2025	-78.19% Apr 20, 2007 - Nov 5, 2010
#3	-56.37% Sep 17, 2015 - Jul 11, 2018	-48.10% Jul 17, 2001 - Jan 18, 2002
#4	-39.59% Mar 5, 2014 - Nov 7, 2014	-39.45% May 17, 2002 - Oct 23, 2002
#5	-36.81% Feb 20, 2020 - Apr 16, 2020	-34.47% Feb 2, 2001 - May 16, 2001
#6	-35.06% Jun 13, 2005 - Dec 16, 2005	-32.03% Jul 6, 2011 - Jan 24, 2012
#7	-30.94% Aug 5, 2020 - Jul 23, 2021	-31.76% Feb 19, 2025 - Jul 3, 2025
#8	-27.76% Nov 9, 2018 - Jan 17, 2019	-30.81% Mar 14, 2006 - Oct 24, 2006
#9	-27.07% Feb 12, 2019 - Jun 19, 2019	-21.95% Dec 29, 2000 - Jan 17, 2001
#10	-19.60% Sep 11, 2018 - Nov 8, 2018	-21.80% Jul 1, 2004 - Oct 29, 2004
#11	-18.16% May 11, 2020 - Jul 6, 2020	-21.54% Dec 11, 2000 - Dec 28, 2000
#12	-17.10% Aug 28, 2019 - Nov 7, 2019	-20.10% Jul 19, 2005 - Nov 25, 2005
#13	-16.61% Apr 14, 2005 - May 16, 2005	-19.20% Feb 26, 2026 - May 15, 2026
#14	-12.93% Aug 14, 2015 - Sep 17, 2015	-15.71% Aug 13, 2025 - Sep 18, 2025
#15	-11.86% Dec 4, 2019 - Jan 7, 2020	-15.67% Jan 7, 2003 - Feb 28, 2003