DUK-P-A vs SQM
Comparison between Duke Energy Corp (DUK-P-A, Company) and Sociedad Quimica Y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM, Company).
5-Year PerformanceSQM has outperformed DUK-P-A, delivering a return of +11.8% compared to +2.6%
DUK-P-A vs SQM - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
DUK-P-A vs SQM - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
DUK-P-A vs SQM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | DUK-P-A | SQM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +1.07% | -0.54% |
| 2025 | +6.33% | +91.19% |
| 2024 | +5.05% | -38.56% |
| 2023 | +8.60% | -15.40% |
| 2022 | -9.48% | +70.49% |
| 2021 | +1.88% | +2.60% |
| 2020 | +7.86% | +87.42% |
| 2019 | +13.32% | -27.79% |
| 2018 | N/A | -35.04% |
| 2017 | N/A | +113.53% |
| 2016 | N/A | +61.04% |
| 2015 | N/A | -20.43% |
| 2014 | N/A | -1.99% |
| 2013 | N/A | -54.46% |
| 2012 | N/A | +7.62% |
| 2011 | N/A | -7.72% |
| 2010 | N/A | +53.00% |
| 2009 | N/A | +51.16% |
| 2008 | N/A | +46.55% |
| 2007 | N/A | +33.91% |
| 2006 | N/A | +23.39% |
| 2005 | N/A | +82.30% |
| 2004 | N/A | +52.01% |
| 2003 | N/A | +94.94% |
| 2002 | N/A | -8.87% |
| 2001 | N/A | +19.25% |
| 2000 | N/A | -10.37% |
| 1999 | N/A | +9.77% |
DUK-P-A vs SQM Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for DUK-P-A was -20.14%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 110 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for SQM was -78.36%, occurring on Jul 27, 2015. Recovery took 1547 trading sessions.
The current DUK-P-A drawdown is -1.08%. The current SQM drawdown is -30.15%.
| Rank | DUK-P-A | SQM |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -20.14% Feb 10, 2020 - Jul 17, 2020 | -78.36% Jul 22, 2011 - Sep 14, 2017 |
| #2 | -14.94% Aug 6, 2021 - Jan 19, 2024 | -73.00% Jan 11, 2018 - Jan 6, 2021 |
| #3 | -5.62% Dec 30, 2020 - Apr 26, 2021 | -72.14% Jun 18, 2008 - Nov 4, 2010 |
| #4 | -4.24% Oct 16, 2024 - Feb 13, 2025 | -69.81% Sep 14, 2022 - Jun 2, 2025 |
| #5 | -3.65% Mar 7, 2024 - Jun 6, 2024 | -35.54% Feb 4, 2000 - May 17, 2002 |
| #6 | -3.54% Sep 4, 2019 - Oct 14, 2019 | -31.32% Oct 3, 2005 - Nov 21, 2006 |
| #7 | -3.41% Aug 20, 2020 - Oct 23, 2020 | -30.96% Jan 12, 2021 - Nov 2, 2021 |
| #8 | -3.38% Mar 3, 2026 - May 8, 2026 | -29.41% Nov 22, 2021 - Feb 15, 2022 |
| #9 | -3.28% Mar 17, 2025 - Jun 4, 2025 | -27.46% Oct 21, 2003 - Aug 26, 2004 |
| #10 | -3.16% Oct 14, 2019 - Dec 23, 2019 | -26.31% May 27, 2022 - Aug 15, 2022 |
| #11 | -2.99% Jul 6, 2021 - Aug 6, 2021 | -26.31% Oct 11, 2007 - Feb 27, 2008 |
| #12 | -2.52% Jul 30, 2019 - Aug 15, 2019 | -24.67% May 17, 2002 - Apr 2, 2003 |
| #13 | -2.23% Jul 30, 2020 - Aug 18, 2020 | -19.95% Jul 2, 2007 - Oct 1, 2007 |
| #14 | -2.22% May 4, 2021 - May 28, 2021 | -19.89% Apr 4, 2022 - May 17, 2022 |
| #15 | -2.13% Jun 4, 2025 - Jul 10, 2025 | -19.15% Aug 15, 2022 - Sep 14, 2022 |
Correlation
Correlation between DUK-P-A and SQM is 0.38 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
DUK-P-A vs SQM dividend yield comparison.
| Year | DUK-P-A | SQM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.92% | 1.50% |
| 2025 | 5.76% | 0.18% |
| 2024 | 5.90% | 0.59% |
| 2023 | 5.89% | 8.34% |
| 2022 | 6.15% | 9.66% |
| 2021 | 5.25% | 3.92% |
| 2020 | 5.04% | 1.64% |
| 2019 | 3.70% | 4.55% |
| 2018 | 0.00% | 5.37% |
| 2017 | 0.00% | 2.73% |
| 2016 | 0.00% | 4.77% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 2.00% |
| 2014 | 0.00% | 4.71% |
| 2013 | 0.00% | 3.21% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 1.69% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 1.40% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 0.87% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 2.70% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 3.71% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 2.01% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 1.76% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 1.49% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 1.21% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 1.20% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 1.88% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 2.16% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 42.10% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks