DSU vs FTMH
Comparison between BlackRock Debt Strategies Fund Inc (DSU, ETF) and Franklin Municipal High Yield ETF (FTMH, ETF).
DSU vs FTMH - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
Net Assets
DSU
$598M
Winner
FTMH
$599M
Expense Ratio
DSU
N/A
FTMH
0.35%
Max Drawdown
DSU
78.64%
Winner
FTMH
3.46%
Sharpe Ratio
DSU
-0.25
Winner
FTMH
0.29
5Y Beta
DSU
0.30
Winner
FTMH
0.13
5Y Dividends CAGR
DSU
10.80%
FTMH
N/A
DSU vs FTMH - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
1M
DSU
-0.85%
Winner
FTMH
-0.48%
3M
DSU
-0.27%
Winner
FTMH
+0.77%
6M
DSU
-0.57%
Winner
FTMH
+2.98%
1Y
DSU
+1.57%
FTMH
N/A
5Y(CAGR)
DSU
+7.16%
FTMH
N/A
10Y(CAGR)
DSU
+7.73%
FTMH
N/A
Max(CAGR)
Winner
DSU
+6.56%
FTMH
+4.87%
DSU vs FTMH - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | DSU | FTMH |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +0.10% | +3.15% |
| 2025 | +5.03% | +0.11% |
| 2024 | +11.83% | N/A |
| 2023 | +29.30% | N/A |
| 2022 | -15.84% | N/A |
| 2021 | +20.28% | N/A |
| 2020 | +2.25% | N/A |
| 2019 | +21.10% | N/A |
| 2018 | -10.89% | N/A |
| 2017 | +10.10% | N/A |
| 2016 | +21.39% | N/A |
| 2015 | -1.18% | N/A |
| 2014 | +0.25% | N/A |
| 2013 | -0.31% | N/A |
| 2012 | +18.15% | N/A |
| 2011 | +10.38% | N/A |
| 2010 | +15.57% | N/A |
| 2009 | +49.57% | N/A |
| 2008 | -48.60% | N/A |
| 2007 | -15.32% | N/A |
| 2006 | +28.62% | N/A |
| 2005 | -0.81% | N/A |
| 2004 | +10.41% | N/A |
| 2003 | +36.60% | N/A |
| 2002 | -2.25% | N/A |
| 2001 | +14.21% | N/A |
| 2000 | -1.28% | N/A |
| 1999 | -5.08% | N/A |
DSU vs FTMH Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for DSU was -71.89%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 1366 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for FTMH was -3.11%, occurring on Mar 27, 2026. Recovery took 62 trading sessions.
The current DSU drawdown is -2.16%. The current FTMH drawdown is -1.27%.
| Rank | DSU | FTMH |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -71.89% Feb 1, 2007 - Jul 3, 2012 | -3.11% Feb 27, 2026 - May 28, 2026 |
| #2 | -45.38% Feb 19, 2020 - Jan 15, 2021 | -1.27% Jul 2, 2026 - Jul 21, 2026 |
| #3 | -30.49% May 16, 2002 - Mar 31, 2003 | -0.89% Nov 28, 2025 - Jan 5, 2026 |
| #4 | -24.22% Dec 28, 2021 - Nov 24, 2023 | -0.56% Jan 9, 2026 - Feb 4, 2026 |
| #5 | -20.52% Aug 16, 2000 - Jan 18, 2001 | -0.56% Nov 11, 2025 - Nov 28, 2025 |
| #6 | -19.43% Jan 31, 2001 - Jan 7, 2002 | -0.39% Oct 27, 2025 - Nov 11, 2025 |
| #7 | -18.01% Jan 21, 2004 - Oct 5, 2004 | -0.34% Jun 4, 2026 - Jun 18, 2026 |
| #8 | -16.34% May 8, 2013 - Jul 22, 2016 | -0.13% Jan 7, 2026 - Jan 9, 2026 |
| #9 | -14.59% Feb 14, 2025 - May 29, 2025 | -0.09% Feb 13, 2026 - Feb 19, 2026 |
| #10 | -14.04% Dec 28, 2004 - Jul 14, 2005 | -0.08% Jun 18, 2026 - Jun 24, 2026 |
| #11 | -13.43% Aug 24, 2018 - Apr 12, 2019 | -0.05% Jun 29, 2026 - Jul 2, 2026 |
| #12 | -12.41% Jul 11, 2003 - Oct 8, 2003 | -0.00% Feb 10, 2026 - Feb 13, 2026 |
| #13 | -10.74% Oct 4, 2012 - Jan 11, 2013 | N/A |
| #14 | -10.58% Sep 12, 2005 - Jan 12, 2006 | N/A |
| #15 | -10.00% Nov 5, 1999 - Jul 27, 2000 | N/A |
Correlation
Correlation between DSU and FTMH is 0.40 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.
0.40
-101
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
DSU vs FTMH dividend yield comparison.
| Year | DSU | FTMH |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 7.26% | 2.25% |
| 2025 | 11.63% | 0.86% |
| 2024 | 11.01% | 0.00% |
| 2023 | 9.70% | 0.00% |
| 2022 | 7.56% | 0.00% |
| 2021 | 6.21% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 7.96% | 0.00% |
| 2019 | 7.43% | 0.00% |
| 2018 | 8.41% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 6.98% | 0.00% |
| 2016 | 6.60% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 8.07% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 7.96% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 8.47% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 7.77% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 8.35% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 9.08% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 11.56% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 24.45% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 11.73% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 8.86% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 10.30% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 9.46% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 11.24% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 14.34% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 14.43% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 7.55% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
Popular: DSU vs SPYFTMH vs SPY
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks