DMB vs RCS

Comparison between BNY Mellon Municipal Bond Infrastructure Fund Inc (DMB, ETF) and PIMCO Strategic Income Fund Inc (RCS, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceRCS has outperformed DMB, delivering a return of +2.4% compared to -1.6%

DMB vs RCS - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	DMB(ETF)	RCS(ETF)
Net Assets	$216M	$216M
Max Drawdown	45.68%	65.91%
Sharpe Ratio	1.09	-0.75
5Y Beta	0.16	0.33
5Y Dividends CAGR	-6.51%	-3.21%

Net Assets

DMB

$216M

Winner

RCS

$216M

Max Drawdown

Winner

DMB

45.68%

RCS

65.91%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

DMB

1.09

RCS

-0.75

5Y Beta

Winner

DMB

0.16

RCS

0.33

5Y Dividends CAGR

DMB

-6.51%

Winner

RCS

-3.21%

DMB vs RCS - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	DMB	RCS
1 month	-0.35%	-1.79%
3 months	+1.89%	+1.49%
6 months	+5.68%	-15.08%
1 year	+14.31%	-14.22%
5 years(CAGR)	-1.61%	+2.39%
10 years(CAGR)	+2.11%	+3.78%
Max(CAGR)	+2.55%	+7.83%

Winner

DMB

-0.35%

RCS

-1.79%

Winner

DMB

+1.89%

RCS

+1.49%

Winner

DMB

+5.68%

RCS

-15.08%

Winner

DMB

+14.31%

RCS

-14.22%

5Y(CAGR)

DMB

-1.61%

Winner

RCS

+2.39%

10Y(CAGR)

DMB

+2.11%

Winner

RCS

+3.78%

Max(CAGR)

DMB

+2.55%

Winner

RCS

+7.83%

DMB vs RCS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	DMB	RCS
2026	+2.57%	-2.26%
2025	+9.74%	-20.94%
2024	+3.98%	+40.23%
2023	+1.28%	+33.89%
2022	-23.14%	-18.91%
2021	+7.81%	+6.67%
2020	+1.72%	-16.70%
2019	+26.28%	+1.41%
2018	-3.89%	+13.07%
2017	+11.17%	+13.48%
2016	+3.68%	+7.92%
2015	+8.20%	+4.36%
2014	+23.98%	+6.25%
2013	-28.51%	-5.47%
2012	N/A	+10.11%
2011	N/A	+21.54%
2010	N/A	+13.66%
2009	N/A	+27.11%
2008	N/A	-1.60%
2007	N/A	-0.27%
2006	N/A	+7.91%
2005	N/A	-6.23%
2004	N/A	+6.65%
2003	N/A	+12.71%
2002	N/A	+23.57%
2001	N/A	+17.00%
2000	N/A	+16.38%
1999	N/A	-0.34%

DMB vs RCS Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for DMB was -40.11%, occurring on Oct 31, 2023. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for RCS was -46.65%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 1325 trading sessions.

The current DMB drawdown is -19.02%. The current RCS drawdown is -27.01%.

Rank	DMB	RCS
#1	-40.11% Sep 17, 2021 - Oct 31, 2023	-46.65% Mar 29, 2019 - Jul 5, 2024
#2	-33.61% Feb 13, 2020 - Jan 21, 2021	-35.00% May 5, 2008 - Sep 9, 2009
#3	-32.69% May 29, 2013 - Feb 1, 2016	-32.92% Oct 2, 2025 - Mar 30, 2026
#4	-16.28% Jul 8, 2016 - Mar 22, 2019	-32.45% Dec 5, 2024 - Sep 23, 2025
#5	-7.56% Feb 12, 2021 - Apr 23, 2021	-24.63% Mar 31, 2004 - Oct 18, 2004
#6	-4.61% Aug 12, 2019 - Dec 31, 2019	-24.31% Nov 8, 2005 - Mar 26, 2008
#7	-4.10% Jul 15, 2021 - Aug 31, 2021	-20.44% Sep 8, 2016 - Apr 25, 2017
#8	-2.83% May 6, 2016 - May 26, 2016	-18.69% Dec 9, 2014 - Dec 2, 2015
#9	-2.69% Jun 14, 2019 - Jul 17, 2019	-17.57% Sep 20, 2012 - Feb 11, 2013
#10	-2.66% Jan 15, 2020 - Feb 10, 2020	-16.05% Jul 14, 2017 - Jul 3, 2018
#11	-2.02% May 27, 2021 - Jul 2, 2021	-15.13% Feb 20, 2013 - May 20, 2014
#12	-1.96% Apr 23, 2021 - May 7, 2021	-14.85% Feb 11, 2005 - Oct 27, 2005
#13	-1.91% Feb 10, 2016 - Mar 1, 2016	-14.63% Mar 9, 2010 - Jul 23, 2010
#14	-1.53% Apr 2, 2019 - Apr 11, 2019	-14.11% Aug 11, 2010 - Feb 28, 2011
#15	-1.22% Mar 7, 2016 - Mar 17, 2016	-13.44% May 20, 2011 - Nov 4, 2011

Correlation

Correlation between DMB and RCS is 0.57 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.

0.57

-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

DMB vs RCS dividend yield comparison.

Year	DMB	RCS
2026	1.99%	4.40%
2025	3.93%	8.62%
2024	3.48%	8.03%
2023	4.46%	10.07%
2022	5.80%	12.39%
2021	4.42%	9.01%
2020	4.54%	9.57%
2019	4.36%	8.44%
2018	5.36%	8.93%
2017	4.89%	9.50%
2016	5.97%	10.92%
2015	6.06%	11.17%
2014	6.16%	10.79%
2013	3.62%	11.35%
2012	0.00%	10.97%
2011	0.00%	12.42%
2010	0.00%	13.84%
2009	0.00%	13.00%
2008	0.00%	14.29%
2007	0.00%	8.43%
2006	0.00%	8.07%
2005	0.00%	8.40%
2004	0.00%	8.19%
2003	0.00%	7.31%
2002	0.00%	8.48%
2001	0.00%	8.72%
2000	0.00%	4.41%