DHF vs FTMN
Comparison between BNY Mellon High Yield Strategies Fund (DHF, ETF) and Franklin Minnesota Municipal Income ETF (FTMN, ETF).
DHF vs FTMN - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
Net Assets
DHF
$198M
FTMN
$198M
Expense Ratio
DHF
N/A
FTMN
0.35%
Max Drawdown
DHF
84.99%
Winner
FTMN
3.34%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
DHF
0.14
FTMN
-0.07
5Y Beta
DHF
0.40
Winner
FTMN
0.10
5Y Dividends CAGR
DHF
-2.48%
FTMN
N/A
DHF vs FTMN - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
1M
DHF
+1.15%
Winner
FTMN
+1.64%
3M
Winner
DHF
+3.93%
FTMN
+1.03%
6M
DHF
+1.05%
Winner
FTMN
+2.14%
1Y
DHF
+3.99%
FTMN
N/A
5Y(CAGR)
DHF
+2.73%
FTMN
N/A
10Y(CAGR)
DHF
+5.85%
FTMN
N/A
Max(CAGR)
Winner
DHF
+4.38%
FTMN
+3.81%
DHF vs FTMN - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | DHF | FTMN |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +0.34% | +1.69% |
| 2025 | +4.42% | +0.61% |
| 2024 | +20.54% | N/A |
| 2023 | +12.87% | N/A |
| 2022 | -24.19% | N/A |
| 2021 | +11.81% | N/A |
| 2020 | +6.03% | N/A |
| 2019 | +23.77% | N/A |
| 2018 | -10.01% | N/A |
| 2017 | +8.75% | N/A |
| 2016 | +20.76% | N/A |
| 2015 | -5.85% | N/A |
| 2014 | -3.44% | N/A |
| 2013 | +6.16% | N/A |
| 2012 | +2.76% | N/A |
| 2011 | +10.98% | N/A |
| 2010 | +32.33% | N/A |
| 2009 | +77.84% | N/A |
| 2008 | -32.39% | N/A |
| 2007 | -4.39% | N/A |
| 2006 | +17.49% | N/A |
| 2005 | -9.02% | N/A |
| 2004 | -2.32% | N/A |
| 2003 | +56.23% | N/A |
| 2002 | -17.18% | N/A |
| 2001 | -10.03% | N/A |
| 2000 | -30.51% | N/A |
| 1999 | -9.65% | N/A |
DHF vs FTMN Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for DHF was -60.22%, occurring on Nov 21, 2008. Recovery took 2542 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for FTMN was -3.10%, occurring on Mar 26, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current DHF drawdown is -3.46%. The current FTMN drawdown is -0.30%.
| Rank | DHF | FTMN |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -60.22% Nov 3, 1999 - Dec 11, 2009 | -3.10% Feb 26, 2026 - Mar 26, 2026 |
| #2 | -42.95% Feb 20, 2020 - Nov 23, 2020 | -0.56% Nov 11, 2025 - Nov 21, 2025 |
| #3 | -37.83% Jun 30, 2021 - Jul 17, 2025 | -0.51% Nov 28, 2025 - Dec 29, 2025 |
| #4 | -26.16% Jun 23, 2014 - Aug 23, 2016 | -0.34% Jan 14, 2026 - Feb 2, 2026 |
| #5 | -19.30% Oct 2, 2018 - Apr 1, 2019 | -0.33% Feb 12, 2026 - Feb 25, 2026 |
| #6 | -17.75% Jun 2, 2011 - Apr 2, 2012 | -0.28% Feb 10, 2026 - Feb 12, 2026 |
| #7 | -14.63% May 8, 2013 - Apr 3, 2014 | -0.17% Dec 30, 2025 - Jan 5, 2026 |
| #8 | -14.00% May 2, 2012 - Jan 29, 2013 | -0.13% Jan 7, 2026 - Jan 14, 2026 |
| #9 | -11.38% Nov 10, 2010 - Feb 14, 2011 | -0.11% Nov 21, 2025 - Nov 28, 2025 |
| #10 | -11.34% Sep 2, 2016 - Jan 27, 2017 | -0.06% Feb 5, 2026 - Feb 9, 2026 |
| #11 | -11.34% Apr 5, 2010 - Jul 7, 2010 | N/A |
| #12 | -8.67% Feb 10, 2026 - Mar 20, 2026 | N/A |
| #13 | -7.54% Oct 10, 2017 - Oct 2, 2018 | N/A |
| #14 | -6.34% Jan 12, 2010 - Feb 23, 2010 | N/A |
| #15 | -5.19% Mar 2, 2017 - Apr 10, 2017 | N/A |
Correlation
Correlation between DHF and FTMN is 0.41 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.
0.41
-101
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
DHF vs FTMN dividend yield comparison.
| Year | DHF | FTMN |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 3.63% | 1.34% |
| 2025 | 8.47% | 0.50% |
| 2024 | 8.14% | 0.00% |
| 2023 | 7.86% | 0.00% |
| 2022 | 10.12% | 0.00% |
| 2021 | 8.24% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 8.60% | 0.00% |
| 2019 | 8.52% | 0.00% |
| 2018 | 10.41% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 8.98% | 0.00% |
| 2016 | 9.76% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 11.30% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 10.14% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 9.88% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 10.92% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 11.51% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 11.29% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 9.97% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 15.74% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 9.14% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 9.15% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 10.66% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 10.62% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 11.56% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 20.33% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 16.29% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 7.76% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
Popular: DHF vs SPYFTMN vs SPY
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks