DDLS vs LEO

Comparison between WISDOMTREE DYNAMIC INTERNATIONAL SMALLCAP EQUITY FUND (DDLS, ETF) and BNY Mellon Strategic Municipals Inc (LEO, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceDDLS has outperformed LEO, delivering a return of +10.0% compared to -4.1%

DDLS vs LEO - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	DDLS(ETF)	LEO(ETF)
Net Assets	$421M	$420M
Expense Ratio	0.48%	N/A
Max Drawdown	39.42%	54.53%
Sharpe Ratio	0.85	0.57
5Y Beta	0.62	0.18
5Y Dividends CAGR	16.34%	-6.11%

Net Assets

Winner

DDLS

$421M

LEO

$420M

Expense Ratio

DDLS

0.48%

LEO

N/A

Max Drawdown

Winner

DDLS

39.42%

LEO

54.53%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

DDLS

0.85

LEO

0.57

5Y Beta

DDLS

0.62

Winner

LEO

0.18

5Y Dividends CAGR

Winner

DDLS

16.34%

LEO

-6.11%

DDLS vs LEO - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	DDLS	LEO
1 month	+2.86%	-0.65%
3 months	+2.09%	-2.22%
6 months	+0.94%	-2.68%
1 year	+15.29%	+10.17%
5 years(CAGR)	+9.95%	-4.07%
10 years(CAGR)	+9.87%	+0.87%
Max(CAGR)	+10.05%	+4.69%

Winner

DDLS

+2.86%

LEO

-0.65%

Winner

DDLS

+2.09%

LEO

-2.22%

Winner

DDLS

+0.94%

LEO

-2.68%

Winner

DDLS

+15.29%

LEO

+10.17%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

DDLS

+9.95%

LEO

-4.07%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

DDLS

+9.87%

LEO

+0.87%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

DDLS

+10.05%

LEO

+4.69%

DDLS vs LEO - Annual Returns (2001 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	DDLS	LEO
2026	+9.59%	+0.05%
2025	+28.36%	+8.40%
2024	+11.28%	+6.40%
2023	+14.21%	-1.05%
2022	-10.87%	-23.74%
2021	+17.66%	+5.05%
2020	-4.05%	+4.86%
2019	+24.61%	+22.72%
2018	-17.35%	-12.42%
2017	+25.36%	+8.83%
2016	+14.45%	+3.50%
2015	N/A	+11.03%
2014	N/A	+15.50%
2013	N/A	-16.60%
2012	N/A	+14.70%
2011	N/A	+23.10%
2010	N/A	+3.15%
2009	N/A	+46.92%
2008	N/A	-27.48%
2007	N/A	-7.07%
2006	N/A	+13.96%
2005	N/A	+7.55%
2004	N/A	-7.35%
2003	N/A	+10.84%
2002	N/A	+6.78%
2001	N/A	+22.11%

DDLS vs LEO Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for DDLS was -36.80%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 277 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for LEO was -47.31%, occurring on Oct 10, 2008. Recovery took 671 trading sessions.

The current LEO drawdown is -18.76%.

Rank	DDLS	LEO
#1	-36.80% Jan 2, 2020 - Feb 8, 2021	-47.31% May 7, 2007 - Jan 5, 2010
#2	-23.10% Jan 26, 2018 - Dec 16, 2019	-41.48% Aug 27, 2021 - Oct 25, 2023
#3	-19.88% Sep 3, 2021 - Dec 21, 2023	-30.28% Feb 25, 2020 - Feb 5, 2021
#4	-11.66% Mar 19, 2025 - Apr 28, 2025	-23.62% Jan 8, 2013 - Nov 3, 2015
#5	-10.69% Feb 26, 2026 - Aug 13, 2026	-21.68% Jan 21, 2004 - Sep 7, 2005
#6	-7.98% Apr 19, 2016 - Aug 16, 2016	-19.81% Sep 10, 2010 - Oct 12, 2011
#7	-7.49% Jul 16, 2024 - Aug 21, 2024	-17.32% Aug 1, 2017 - Jul 2, 2019
#8	-6.01% Sep 26, 2024 - Mar 17, 2025	-12.16% Jul 8, 2016 - Jul 11, 2017
#9	-4.18% Oct 27, 2025 - Nov 28, 2025	-11.77% Oct 1, 2002 - Apr 29, 2003
#10	-3.64% Aug 23, 2024 - Sep 19, 2024	-11.61% Jun 12, 2003 - Jan 7, 2004
#11	-3.52% Jun 14, 2021 - Jul 26, 2021	-9.85% Aug 28, 2001 - Dec 31, 2001
#12	-3.51% Sep 7, 2016 - Nov 22, 2016	-8.30% Sep 7, 2005 - Mar 29, 2006
#13	-3.33% Dec 28, 2023 - Feb 22, 2024	-6.69% Mar 12, 2012 - May 9, 2012
#14	-3.31% May 31, 2024 - Jul 5, 2024	-6.02% Nov 29, 2012 - Jan 8, 2013
#15	-3.22% Nov 8, 2017 - Dec 13, 2017	-5.98% Dec 31, 2001 - Apr 5, 2002

Correlation

Correlation between DDLS and LEO is 0.24 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.

0.24

-101

Dividend Comparison (2001 - 2026)

DDLS vs LEO dividend yield comparison.

Year	DDLS	LEO
2026	1.86%	3.52%
2025	3.80%	4.03%
2024	4.11%	3.77%
2023	4.05%	4.37%
2022	5.44%	5.66%
2021	3.18%	4.84%
2020	3.16%	4.95%
2019	3.68%	4.94%
2018	1.75%	5.96%
2017	1.60%	5.97%
2016	3.47%	6.14%
2015	0.00%	6.04%
2014	0.00%	7.11%
2013	0.00%	7.74%
2012	0.00%	6.16%
2011	0.00%	6.61%
2010	0.00%	7.54%
2009	0.00%	6.32%
2008	0.00%	8.94%
2007	0.00%	6.13%
2006	0.00%	5.03%
2005	0.00%	6.51%
2004	0.00%	7.38%
2003	0.00%	7.32%
2002	0.00%	7.14%
2001	0.00%	5.74%