CZA vs TMB
Comparison between INVESCO ZACKS MID-CAP ETF (CZA, ETF) and THORNBURG MULTI SECTOR BOND ETF (TMB, ETF).
CZA vs TMB - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
Net Assets
CZA
$184M
Winner
TMB
$185M
Expense Ratio
CZA
0.69%
Winner
TMB
0.55%
Max Drawdown
CZA
53.86%
Winner
TMB
0.53%
Sharpe Ratio
CZA
0.94
Winner
TMB
1.07
5Y Beta
CZA
0.75
Winner
TMB
0.15
P/E Ratio
CZA
17.60
TMB
N/A
Forward P/E
CZA
15.45
TMB
N/A
PEG Ratio
CZA
0.23
TMB
N/A
5Y Dividends CAGR
CZA
7.13%
TMB
N/A
5Y EPS CAGR
CZA
16.17%
TMB
N/A
P/S Ratio
CZA
1.31
TMB
N/A
P/B Ratio
CZA
2.13
TMB
N/A
CZA vs TMB - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
1M
CZA
+3.21%
TMB
N/A
3M
CZA
+8.89%
TMB
N/A
6M
CZA
+8.04%
TMB
N/A
1Y
CZA
+15.85%
TMB
N/A
5Y(CAGR)
CZA
+7.21%
TMB
N/A
10Y(CAGR)
CZA
+10.51%
TMB
N/A
Max(CAGR)
Winner
CZA
+9.61%
TMB
+8.08%
CZA vs TMB - Annual Returns (2007 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CZA | TMB |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +8.02% | +0.36% |
| 2025 | +8.91% | N/A |
| 2024 | +12.40% | N/A |
| 2023 | +7.13% | N/A |
| 2022 | -5.38% | N/A |
| 2021 | +29.39% | N/A |
| 2020 | -0.00% | N/A |
| 2019 | +33.06% | N/A |
| 2018 | -9.19% | N/A |
| 2017 | +21.26% | N/A |
| 2016 | +16.93% | N/A |
| 2015 | -1.42% | N/A |
| 2014 | +10.81% | N/A |
| 2013 | +32.43% | N/A |
| 2012 | +14.15% | N/A |
| 2011 | +2.97% | N/A |
| 2010 | +21.93% | N/A |
| 2009 | +40.05% | N/A |
| 2008 | -35.54% | N/A |
| 2007 | +1.98% | N/A |
CZA vs TMB Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CZA was -53.20%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 832 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for TMB was -0.42%, occurring on Jun 5, 2026. Recovery took 9 trading sessions.
The current TMB drawdown is -0.10%.
| Rank | CZA | TMB |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -53.20% Jul 17, 2007 - Nov 2, 2010 | -0.42% May 29, 2026 - Jun 11, 2026 |
| #2 | -46.18% Feb 18, 2020 - Jan 12, 2021 | -0.10% Jun 11, 2026 - Jun 12, 2026 |
| #3 | -23.45% Jul 7, 2011 - Mar 15, 2012 | N/A |
| #4 | -18.92% Nov 29, 2024 - Dec 10, 2025 | N/A |
| #5 | -18.83% Jun 19, 2015 - Jun 1, 2016 | N/A |
| #6 | -18.05% Sep 21, 2018 - Apr 1, 2019 | N/A |
| #7 | -17.45% Jan 4, 2022 - Feb 2, 2023 | N/A |
| #8 | -16.01% Feb 2, 2023 - Dec 27, 2023 | N/A |
| #9 | -10.21% Sep 2, 2014 - Nov 21, 2014 | N/A |
| #10 | -9.65% May 1, 2012 - Sep 6, 2012 | N/A |
| #11 | -9.21% Mar 2, 2026 - Jun 4, 2026 | N/A |
| #12 | -9.04% Jan 26, 2018 - Aug 27, 2018 | N/A |
| #13 | -7.42% Jun 8, 2016 - Jul 14, 2016 | N/A |
| #14 | -6.84% Jul 24, 2019 - Sep 16, 2019 | N/A |
| #15 | -6.56% Nov 16, 2021 - Dec 27, 2021 | N/A |
Correlation
Correlation between CZA and TMB is -1.00 which considered as a very strong negative correlation - the stocks move almost identically in opposite directions.
-1.00
-101
Dividend Comparison (2007 - 2026)
CZA vs TMB dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CZA | TMB |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.00% | 0.36% |
| 2025 | 1.56% | 0.00% |
| 2024 | 1.27% | 0.00% |
| 2023 | 1.36% | 0.00% |
| 2022 | 1.71% | 0.00% |
| 2021 | 0.89% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 1.42% | 0.00% |
| 2019 | 1.40% | 0.00% |
| 2018 | 1.27% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 1.10% | 0.00% |
| 2016 | 1.87% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 1.37% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 0.74% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 1.01% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 1.23% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 0.24% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 0.68% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 0.08% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 1.01% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 0.37% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
Popular: CZA vs SPYTMB vs SPY
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks