CXW vs AEHR

Comparison between CoreCivic Inc (CXW, Company) and Aehr Test Systems (AEHR, Company).

CXW is from the Industrials sector, while AEHR is from the Technology sector.

5-Year PerformanceAEHR has outperformed CXW, delivering a return of +104.4% compared to +20.7%

CXW vs AEHR - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	CXW(COMPANY)	AEHR(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$2.95B	$2.95B
Max Drawdown	97.37%	95.45%
Sharpe Ratio	1.08	2.34
5Y Beta	0.79	2.94
Industry	Security & Protection Services	Semiconductor Equipment & Materials
P/E Ratio	23.70	-317.02
Forward P/E	18.59	9.86
PEG Ratio	0.37	N/A
5Y Dividends CAGR	-7.36%	N/A
5Y EPS CAGR	N/A	-10.20%
Debt to Equity	100.14%	0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield	5.56%	-0.41%

Market Cap

Winner

CXW

$2.95B

AEHR

$2.95B

Max Drawdown

CXW

97.37%

Winner

AEHR

95.45%

Sharpe Ratio

CXW

1.08

Winner

AEHR

2.34

5Y Beta

Winner

CXW

0.79

AEHR

2.94

Industry

CXW

Security & Protection Services

AEHR

Semiconductor Equipment & Materials

P/E Ratio

CXW

23.70

Winner

AEHR

-317.02

Forward P/E

CXW

18.59

Winner

AEHR

9.86

PEG Ratio

CXW

0.37

AEHR

N/A

5Y Dividends CAGR

CXW

-7.36%

AEHR

N/A

5Y EPS CAGR

CXW

N/A

AEHR

-10.20%

Debt to Equity

CXW

100.14%

Winner

AEHR

0.00%

Free Cash Flow Yield

Winner

CXW

5.56%

AEHR

-0.41%

CXW vs AEHR - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	CXW	AEHR
1 month	+38.60%	+0.19%
3 months	+49.45%	+142.92%
6 months	+56.02%	+331.35%
1 year	+46.29%	+695.32%
5 years(CAGR)	+20.67%	+104.39%
10 years(CAGR)	+2.07%	+49.39%
Max(CAGR)	+4.56%	+12.08%

Winner

CXW

+38.60%

AEHR

+0.19%

CXW

+49.45%

Winner

AEHR

+142.92%

CXW

+56.02%

Winner

AEHR

+331.35%

CXW

+46.29%

Winner

AEHR

+695.32%

5Y(CAGR)

CXW

+20.67%

Winner

AEHR

+104.39%

10Y(CAGR)

CXW

+2.07%

Winner

AEHR

+49.39%

Max(CAGR)

CXW

+4.56%

Winner

AEHR

+12.08%

CXW vs AEHR - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	CXW	AEHR
2026	+56.68%	+329.60%
2025	-12.06%	+21.99%
2024	+50.45%	-33.35%
2023	+26.57%	+44.26%
2022	+14.12%	-14.07%
2021	+48.81%	+899.17%
2020	-59.50%	+22.22%
2019	+7.09%	+29.87%
2018	-14.26%	-49.64%
2017	-3.81%	+13.87%
2016	-1.74%	+28.19%
2015	-22.91%	-31.64%
2014	+19.62%	-19.05%
2013	+10.92%	+267.86%
2012	+72.04%	+44.07%
2011	-18.75%	-55.93%
2010	+0.32%	-14.29%
2009	+46.39%	-45.00%
2008	-43.51%	-66.34%
2007	+29.37%	+17.31%
2006	+47.91%	+20.77%
2005	+11.01%	+3.48%
2004	+37.68%	+32.72%
2003	+68.40%	+13.14%
2002	-4.72%	-35.79%
2001	+388.41%	-15.00%
2000	-87.84%	+5.00%
1999	-52.40%	+9.58%

CXW vs AEHR Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CXW was -95.29%, occurring on Dec 15, 2000. Recovery took 1698 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for AEHR was -95.45%, occurring on Nov 22, 2011. Recovery took 3824 trading sessions.

The current AEHR drawdown is -18.34%.

Rank	CXW	AEHR
#1	-95.29% Nov 1, 1999 - Aug 3, 2006	-95.45% Jul 5, 2006 - Sep 13, 2021
#2	-78.32% Mar 20, 2015 - Jun 15, 2026	-87.37% Aug 1, 2023 - Apr 8, 2026
#3	-70.25% Jul 5, 2007 - Aug 15, 2012	-81.47% Mar 15, 2000 - Jun 29, 2006
#4	-18.78% May 17, 2013 - Oct 28, 2014	-73.02% Nov 5, 2021 - Nov 23, 2022
#5	-9.07% Nov 7, 2006 - Jan 19, 2007	-39.77% Mar 23, 2023 - Jun 2, 2023
#6	-8.96% Nov 6, 2012 - Dec 7, 2012	-36.27% Dec 1, 2022 - Jan 10, 2023
#7	-7.17% Feb 20, 2007 - Apr 13, 2007	-23.70% May 14, 2026 - May 26, 2026
#8	-6.43% Feb 7, 2013 - Mar 28, 2013	-22.22% Feb 14, 2000 - Mar 13, 2000
#9	-6.04% Sep 13, 2012 - Nov 1, 2012	-20.35% Sep 24, 2021 - Oct 7, 2021
#10	-5.88% Feb 18, 2015 - Mar 19, 2015	-20.29% Feb 2, 2023 - Mar 21, 2023
#11	-5.57% Sep 12, 2006 - Oct 5, 2006	-19.95% Jun 4, 2026 - Jun 10, 2026
#12	-4.89% Nov 4, 2014 - Dec 18, 2014	-16.00% May 26, 2026 - Jun 2, 2026
#13	-4.40% Oct 5, 2006 - Nov 6, 2006	-15.97% Apr 22, 2026 - May 11, 2026
#14	-4.39% Jun 19, 2007 - Jul 5, 2007	-13.68% Jul 3, 2023 - Jul 14, 2023
#15	-3.97% Jan 29, 2015 - Feb 13, 2015	-11.96% Jun 14, 2023 - Jul 3, 2023