StockComparison Logo
vs

CXW vs ABM

Comparison between CoreCivic Inc (CXW, Company) and ABM Industries Inc (ABM, Company).

Both CXW and ABM are from the Industrials sector.

5-Year PerformanceCXW has outperformed ABM, delivering a return of +18.7% compared to +1.1%

CXW vs ABM - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
CXW
$2.62B
Winner
ABM
$2.63B
Max Drawdown
CXW
97.37%
Winner
ABM
61.26%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
CXW
0.64
ABM
-0.03
5Y Beta
CXW
0.79
Winner
ABM
0.68
Industry
CXW
Security & Protection Services
ABM
Specialty Business Services
P/E Ratio
CXW
21.03
Winner
ABM
16.91
Forward P/E
CXW
15.75
Winner
ABM
9.13
PEG Ratio
CXW
0.33
Winner
ABM
0.15
Dividend Yield
CXW
N/A
ABM
2.47%
5Y Dividends CAGR
CXW
-7.36%
Winner
ABM
12.89%
5Y EPS CAGR
CXW
N/A
ABM
-3.74%
Debt to Equity
Winner
CXW
100.14%
ABM
106.58%
Free Cash Flow Yield
CXW
6.27%
Winner
ABM
12.71%
P/S Ratio
CXW
1.06
Winner
ABM
0.29
P/B Ratio
CXW
1.78
Winner
ABM
1.48

CXW vs ABM - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
CXW
+35.06%
ABM
+17.14%
3M
Winner
CXW
+53.52%
ABM
+13.74%
6M
Winner
CXW
+41.69%
ABM
-0.61%
1Y
Winner
CXW
+25.23%
ABM
+2.00%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
CXW
+18.67%
ABM
+1.07%
10Y(CAGR)
CXW
+1.03%
Winner
ABM
+4.21%
Max(CAGR)
CXW
+4.16%
Winner
ABM
+7.62%

CXW vs ABM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearCXWABM
2026+41.17%+9.63%
2025-12.06%-15.84%
2024+50.45%+17.10%
2023+26.57%+1.92%
2022+14.12%+10.64%
2021+48.81%+12.51%
2020-59.50%+0.28%
2019+7.09%+22.93%
2018-14.26%-13.12%
2017-3.81%-6.43%
2016-1.74%+50.55%
2015-22.91%+1.75%
2014+19.62%+3.77%
2013+10.92%+43.61%
2012+72.04%-1.70%
2011-18.75%-21.21%
2010+0.32%+26.88%
2009+46.39%+12.63%
2008-43.51%-3.32%
2007+29.37%-10.09%
2006+47.91%+18.20%
2005+11.01%+5.62%
2004+37.68%+13.79%
2003+68.40%+12.17%
2002-4.72%+3.14%
2001+388.41%+6.08%
2000-87.84%+54.84%
1999-52.40%-13.97%

CXW vs ABM Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CXW was -95.29%, occurring on Dec 15, 2000. Recovery took 1698 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for ABM was -59.62%, occurring on Mar 2, 2009. Recovery took 1541 trading sessions.

The current CXW drawdown is -1.68%. The current ABM drawdown is -18.38%.

RankCXWABM
#1-95.29%
Nov 1, 1999 - Aug 3, 2006
-59.62%
Jun 5, 2007 - Jul 18, 2013
#2-78.32%
Mar 20, 2015 - Oct 28, 2020
-51.98%
Jul 27, 2017 - Jan 13, 2021
#3-70.25%
Jul 5, 2007 - Aug 15, 2012
-34.35%
Nov 11, 2024 - Mar 20, 2026
#4-18.78%
May 17, 2013 - Oct 28, 2014
-34.25%
Jun 21, 2001 - Mar 26, 2002
#5-9.07%
Nov 7, 2006 - Jan 19, 2007
-33.33%
May 3, 2002 - Jan 15, 2004
#6-8.96%
Nov 6, 2012 - Dec 7, 2012
-28.98%
Apr 22, 2022 - Dec 13, 2023
#7-7.17%
Feb 20, 2007 - Apr 13, 2007
-26.63%
Apr 23, 2021 - Apr 20, 2022
#8-6.43%
Feb 7, 2013 - Mar 28, 2013
-24.59%
Dec 1, 2004 - Dec 13, 2006
#9-6.04%
Sep 13, 2012 - Nov 1, 2012
-23.45%
Dec 13, 2023 - Jun 21, 2024
#10-5.88%
Feb 18, 2015 - Mar 19, 2015
-20.43%
Aug 17, 2015 - May 10, 2016
#11-5.57%
Sep 12, 2006 - Oct 5, 2006
-19.53%
Mar 23, 2000 - Aug 30, 2000
#12-4.89%
Nov 4, 2014 - Dec 18, 2014
-17.56%
Nov 1, 1999 - Feb 16, 2000
#13-4.40%
Oct 5, 2006 - Nov 6, 2006
-15.59%
Mar 4, 2014 - Dec 23, 2014
#14-4.39%
Jun 19, 2007 - Jul 5, 2007
-14.17%
Aug 30, 2024 - Nov 6, 2024
#15-3.97%
Jan 29, 2015 - Feb 13, 2015
-12.99%
Jun 8, 2004 - Sep 10, 2004

Correlation

Correlation between CXW and ABM is 0.54 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.

0.54
-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

CXW vs ABM dividend yield comparison.

YearCXWABM
20260.00%1.26%
20250.00%2.51%
20240.00%1.76%
20230.00%1.96%
20220.00%1.76%
20210.00%1.86%
202013.44%1.47%
20197.59%2.40%
20189.65%2.18%
20177.47%1.80%
20168.34%1.62%
20158.15%1.69%
20145.61%2.18%
201326.82%2.12%
20121.69%3.66%
20110.00%2.72%
20100.00%2.05%
20090.00%2.52%
20080.00%2.62%
20070.00%2.35%
20060.00%1.94%
20050.00%2.15%
20040.00%2.03%
20030.00%2.18%
20020.00%2.32%
20010.00%2.11%
2000275.74%2.02%

Select Stocks to Compare