CXM vs TMP

Comparison between Sprinklr Inc Class A (CXM, Company) and Tompkins Financial Corp (TMP, Company).

CXM is from the Technology sector, while TMP is from the Financial Services sector.

5-Year PerformanceTMP has outperformed CXM, delivering a return of +5.9% compared to -21.3%

CXM vs TMP - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	CXM(COMPANY)	TMP(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$1.29B	$1.29B
Max Drawdown	79.84%	54.68%
Sharpe Ratio	-1.18	1.42
5Y Beta	0.96	0.95
Industry	Software - Application	Banks - Regional
P/E Ratio	73.57	14.14
Forward P/E	20.70	12.85
PEG Ratio	0.82	0.03
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.91%
5Y Dividends CAGR	N/A	8.79%
5Y EPS CAGR	N/A	2.95%
Debt to Equity	0.00%	0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield	11.22%	11.21%
P/S Ratio	1.44	2.92
P/B Ratio	2.57	1.36

Market Cap

Winner

CXM

$1.29B

TMP

$1.29B

Max Drawdown

CXM

79.84%

Winner

TMP

54.68%

Sharpe Ratio

CXM

-1.18

Winner

TMP

1.42

5Y Beta

CXM

0.96

Winner

TMP

0.95

Industry

CXM

Software - Application

TMP

Banks - Regional

P/E Ratio

CXM

73.57

Winner

TMP

14.14

Forward P/E

CXM

20.70

Winner

TMP

12.85

PEG Ratio

CXM

0.82

Winner

TMP

0.03

Dividend Yield

CXM

N/A

TMP

2.91%

5Y Dividends CAGR

CXM

N/A

TMP

8.79%

5Y EPS CAGR

CXM

N/A

TMP

2.95%

Debt to Equity

CXM

0.00%

TMP

0.00%

Free Cash Flow Yield

Winner

CXM

11.22%

TMP

11.21%

P/S Ratio

Winner

CXM

1.44

TMP

2.92

P/B Ratio

CXM

2.57

Winner

TMP

1.36

CXM vs TMP - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	CXM	TMP
1 month	+5.53%	+10.01%
3 months	-9.18%	+24.65%
6 months	-33.50%	+26.12%
1 year	-34.16%	+50.93%
5 years(CAGR)	-21.34%	+5.94%
10 years(CAGR)	N/A	+6.53%
Max(CAGR)	-21.34%	+9.35%

CXM

+5.53%

Winner

TMP

+10.01%

CXM

-9.18%

Winner

TMP

+24.65%

CXM

-33.50%

Winner

TMP

+26.12%

CXM

-34.16%

Winner

TMP

+50.93%

5Y(CAGR)

CXM

-21.34%

Winner

TMP

+5.94%

10Y(CAGR)

CXM

N/A

TMP

+6.53%

Max(CAGR)

CXM

-21.34%

Winner

TMP

+9.35%

CXM vs TMP - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	CXM	TMP
2026	-27.05%	+28.93%
2025	-8.90%	+12.90%
2024	-28.39%	+19.63%
2023	+49.19%	-18.67%
2022	-48.71%	-4.99%
2021	-9.83%	+24.22%
2020	N/A	-20.29%
2019	N/A	+23.83%
2018	N/A	-5.29%
2017	N/A	-12.73%
2016	N/A	+77.26%
2015	N/A	+6.21%
2014	N/A	+14.31%
2013	N/A	+30.36%
2012	N/A	+3.97%
2011	N/A	-1.51%
2010	N/A	+8.35%
2009	N/A	-24.50%
2008	N/A	+59.21%
2007	N/A	-11.66%
2006	N/A	+13.41%
2005	N/A	-2.27%
2004	N/A	+19.23%
2003	N/A	+18.73%
2002	N/A	+14.92%
2001	N/A	+49.85%
2000	N/A	+1.57%
1999	N/A	-1.23%

CXM vs TMP Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CXM was -79.84%, occurring on Apr 23, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for TMP was -47.80%, occurring on Apr 17, 2024. Recovery took 1220 trading sessions.

The current CXM drawdown is -77.76%.

Rank	CXM	TMP
#1	-79.84% Jun 28, 2021 - Apr 23, 2026	-47.80% Mar 12, 2021 - Jan 21, 2026
#2	N/A	-44.80% Dec 30, 2008 - Jul 5, 2013
#3	N/A	-39.72% Jan 16, 2020 - Mar 8, 2021
#4	N/A	-37.67% Oct 30, 2006 - Mar 18, 2008
#5	N/A	-31.65% Sep 19, 2008 - Nov 26, 2008
#6	N/A	-28.21% Apr 16, 2008 - Sep 18, 2008
#7	N/A	-25.45% Nov 22, 1999 - Mar 29, 2001
#8	N/A	-24.02% Jan 4, 2017 - Dec 12, 2019
#9	N/A	-21.51% May 16, 2001 - Aug 16, 2001
#10	N/A	-21.28% May 3, 2002 - Jun 28, 2002
#11	N/A	-21.17% Dec 15, 2004 - Dec 9, 2005
#12	N/A	-18.02% Dec 1, 2015 - Mar 11, 2016
#13	N/A	-17.62% Jun 28, 2002 - Mar 25, 2003
#14	N/A	-15.29% Sep 23, 2003 - Nov 24, 2004
#15	N/A	-13.51% Nov 26, 2008 - Dec 19, 2008

Correlation

Correlation between CXM and TMP is -0.41 which considered as a weak negative correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move in opposite directions.

-0.41

-101