CX vs KIM
Comparison between Cemex S.A.B. De C.V. (CX, Company) and Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM, Company).
CX is from the Basic Materials sector, while KIM is from the Real Estate sector.
5-Year PerformanceCX has outperformed KIM, delivering a return of +9.2% compared to +9.0%
CX vs KIM - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CX vs KIM - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CX vs KIM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CX | KIM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +6.23% | +31.14% |
| 2025 | +104.18% | -7.49% |
| 2024 | -25.13% | +15.19% |
| 2023 | +88.11% | +5.65% |
| 2022 | -39.37% | -10.54% |
| 2021 | +31.40% | +77.51% |
| 2020 | +34.64% | -19.32% |
| 2019 | -22.00% | +50.49% |
| 2018 | -37.73% | -13.05% |
| 2017 | -1.27% | -24.40% |
| 2016 | +59.68% | +1.38% |
| 2015 | -41.25% | +8.04% |
| 2014 | -4.16% | +32.30% |
| 2013 | +23.75% | +5.34% |
| 2012 | +90.63% | +21.03% |
| 2011 | -46.86% | -7.63% |
| 2010 | -5.97% | +37.72% |
| 2009 | +27.97% | -19.52% |
| 2008 | -63.68% | -46.82% |
| 2007 | -22.35% | -16.33% |
| 2006 | +11.45% | +42.03% |
| 2005 | +69.01% | +16.39% |
| 2004 | +42.92% | +35.26% |
| 2003 | +23.50% | +51.95% |
| 2002 | -12.01% | -1.45% |
| 2001 | +42.94% | +18.99% |
| 2000 | -34.04% | +39.39% |
| 1999 | +21.85% | +1.58% |
CX vs KIM Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CX was -92.41%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for KIM was -85.66%, occurring on Mar 30, 2009. Recovery took 3817 trading sessions.
The current CX drawdown is -41.56%. The current KIM drawdown is -1.53%.
| Rank | CX | KIM |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -92.41% Jun 15, 2007 - Mar 23, 2020 | -85.66% Feb 21, 2007 - Apr 19, 2022 |
| #2 | -48.40% May 17, 2002 - Apr 2, 2004 | -33.66% Apr 28, 2022 - Sep 11, 2024 |
| #3 | -36.55% Dec 30, 1999 - May 23, 2001 | -25.89% Nov 27, 2024 - Apr 17, 2026 |
| #4 | -33.50% May 8, 2006 - Jan 24, 2007 | -20.79% Apr 1, 2004 - Sep 3, 2004 |
| #5 | -28.80% Jul 27, 2001 - Mar 8, 2002 | -15.35% Apr 12, 2002 - Feb 14, 2003 |
| #6 | -18.76% Mar 7, 2005 - Jun 14, 2005 | -15.12% Mar 29, 2006 - Aug 22, 2006 |
| #7 | -14.77% Feb 21, 2007 - May 30, 2007 | -14.00% Aug 2, 2005 - Dec 23, 2005 |
| #8 | -14.60% Feb 1, 2006 - Apr 4, 2006 | -11.20% Nov 3, 1999 - Jan 6, 2000 |
| #9 | -12.32% Apr 23, 2004 - Jun 7, 2004 | -10.77% Aug 21, 2001 - Oct 9, 2001 |
| #10 | -12.12% Sep 21, 2004 - Nov 17, 2004 | -10.28% Dec 30, 2004 - May 18, 2005 |
| #11 | -10.56% Sep 6, 2005 - Nov 2, 2005 | -9.97% Dec 6, 2001 - Apr 10, 2002 |
| #12 | -9.47% May 23, 2001 - Jul 2, 2001 | -7.86% Jan 10, 2000 - Mar 16, 2000 |
| #13 | -9.39% Jun 21, 2004 - Sep 14, 2004 | -7.84% Jan 3, 2001 - Apr 26, 2001 |
| #14 | -9.29% Nov 11, 1999 - Dec 3, 1999 | -7.03% Jul 25, 2000 - Dec 5, 2000 |
| #15 | -7.94% Aug 11, 2005 - Sep 1, 2005 | -6.74% Sep 4, 2003 - Nov 6, 2003 |
Correlation
Correlation between CX and KIM is 0.43 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
CX vs KIM dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CX | KIM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.44% | 2.02% |
| 2025 | 0.77% | 4.98% |
| 2024 | 1.10% | 4.14% |
| 2023 | 0.00% | 4.79% |
| 2022 | 0.00% | 3.97% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 2.76% |
| 2020 | 0.00% | 3.60% |
| 2019 | 2.63% | 5.41% |
| 2018 | 0.00% | 7.65% |
| 2017 | 0.00% | 6.01% |
| 2016 | 0.00% | 4.11% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 3.68% |
| 2014 | 4.87% | 3.64% |
| 2013 | 3.77% | 4.33% |
| 2012 | 3.17% | 4.04% |
| 2011 | 6.54% | 4.50% |
| 2010 | 4.06% | 3.66% |
| 2009 | 3.30% | 5.32% |
| 2008 | 9.14% | 9.19% |
| 2007 | 2.88% | 4.18% |
| 2006 | 1.96% | 3.07% |
| 2005 | 2.02% | 3.96% |
| 2004 | 2.80% | 4.00% |
| 2003 | 3.98% | 4.89% |
| 2002 | 4.76% | 6.85% |
| 2001 | 3.64% | 6.00% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 6.16% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 1.95% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks