CWT vs PK
Comparison between California Water Service Group (CWT, Company) and Park Hotels & Resorts Inc (PK, Company).
CWT is from the Utilities sector, while PK is from the Real Estate sector.
5-Year PerformancePK has outperformed CWT, delivering a return of +3.8% compared to -2.1%
CWT vs PK - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CWT vs PK - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CWT vs PK - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CWT | PK |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +19.42% | +45.66% |
| 2025 | -0.56% | -16.68% |
| 2024 | -10.67% | -0.15% |
| 2023 | -14.49% | +53.09% |
| 2022 | -14.14% | -37.27% |
| 2021 | +36.49% | +14.22% |
| 2020 | +8.60% | -28.35% |
| 2019 | +13.02% | +8.51% |
| 2018 | +8.62% | +1.19% |
| 2017 | +36.99% | +13.66% |
| 2016 | +50.02% | N/A |
| 2015 | -2.76% | N/A |
| 2014 | +13.13% | N/A |
| 2013 | +27.66% | N/A |
| 2012 | +4.24% | N/A |
| 2011 | +0.31% | N/A |
| 2010 | +4.11% | N/A |
| 2009 | -17.22% | N/A |
| 2008 | +30.29% | N/A |
| 2007 | -3.71% | N/A |
| 2006 | +8.87% | N/A |
| 2005 | +7.39% | N/A |
| 2004 | +41.17% | N/A |
| 2003 | +18.55% | N/A |
| 2002 | -1.59% | N/A |
| 2001 | +4.86% | N/A |
| 2000 | +0.59% | N/A |
| 1999 | +1.03% | N/A |
CWT vs PK Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CWT was -38.22%, occurring on Jan 10, 2025. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for PK was -84.23%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current CWT drawdown is -22.26%. The current PK drawdown is -24.66%.
| Rank | CWT | PK |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -38.22% Jan 3, 2022 - Jan 10, 2025 | -84.23% May 3, 2019 - Mar 18, 2020 |
| #2 | -31.27% Dec 27, 1999 - Apr 22, 2003 | -23.70% Sep 7, 2018 - Apr 2, 2019 |
| #3 | -30.88% Oct 31, 2007 - Dec 17, 2008 | -16.35% Jan 23, 2018 - Apr 25, 2018 |
| #4 | -26.71% Dec 31, 2008 - Feb 19, 2013 | -8.76% Jan 27, 2017 - Jun 12, 2017 |
| #5 | -25.99% Feb 18, 2020 - Jan 6, 2021 | -7.03% Jun 1, 2018 - Jul 23, 2018 |
| #6 | -25.15% Apr 21, 2006 - Jan 10, 2007 | -6.21% Jul 3, 2017 - Sep 25, 2017 |
| #7 | -22.54% Jan 29, 2015 - Feb 12, 2016 | -5.32% Apr 2, 2019 - May 1, 2019 |
| #8 | -21.98% Nov 30, 2017 - Nov 16, 2018 | -5.02% Jan 4, 2017 - Jan 25, 2017 |
| #9 | -21.54% Aug 3, 2005 - Jan 27, 2006 | -3.99% Nov 8, 2017 - Dec 18, 2017 |
| #10 | -21.46% Jan 10, 2007 - Aug 8, 2007 | -3.50% Aug 2, 2018 - Aug 17, 2018 |
| #11 | -18.56% Aug 9, 2007 - Oct 29, 2007 | -3.24% Oct 19, 2017 - Nov 2, 2017 |
| #12 | -17.83% Jun 18, 2003 - Apr 27, 2004 | -2.78% Jul 23, 2018 - Aug 1, 2018 |
| #13 | -14.80% Dec 30, 2004 - Jun 1, 2005 | -2.01% Jun 14, 2017 - Jul 3, 2017 |
| #14 | -14.76% Jul 5, 2016 - Nov 22, 2016 | -1.98% Aug 22, 2018 - Aug 28, 2018 |
| #15 | -14.67% Mar 25, 2014 - Jun 27, 2014 | -1.84% Aug 30, 2018 - Sep 6, 2018 |
Correlation
Correlation between CWT and PK is -0.29 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
CWT vs PK dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CWT | PK |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.33% | 3.32% |
| 2025 | 2.86% | 9.56% |
| 2024 | 2.47% | 9.95% |
| 2023 | 2.01% | 14.05% |
| 2022 | 1.65% | 2.37% |
| 2021 | 1.28% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 1.57% | 2.62% |
| 2019 | 1.53% | 7.34% |
| 2018 | 1.57% | 12.86% |
| 2017 | 1.59% | 16.10% |
| 2016 | 2.04% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 2.88% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 2.64% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 2.77% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 3.43% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 3.37% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 3.19% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 3.20% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 2.52% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 3.13% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 3.57% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 2.98% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 3.00% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 4.11% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 4.74% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 5.42% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 4.13% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks