CVI vs BTU

Comparison between CVR Energy Inc (CVI, Company) and Peabody Energy Corp New (BTU, Company).

Both CVI and BTU are from the Energy sector.

5-Year PerformanceBTU has outperformed CVI, delivering a return of +33.6% compared to +27.2%

CVI vs BTU - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	CVI(COMPANY)	BTU(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$3.22B	$3.22B
Max Drawdown	92.39%	98.25%
Sharpe Ratio	0.82	1.35
5Y Beta	0.64	0.72
Industry	Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing	Thermal Coal
P/E Ratio	-58.51	-33.55
Forward P/E	32.47	24.69
Dividend Yield	1.45%	1.22%
5Y Dividends CAGR	46.83%	N/A
Debt to Equity	315.99%	0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield	12.52%	-5.21%

Market Cap

Winner

CVI

$3.22B

BTU

$3.22B

Max Drawdown

Winner

CVI

92.39%

BTU

98.25%

Sharpe Ratio

CVI

0.82

Winner

BTU

1.35

5Y Beta

Winner

CVI

0.64

BTU

0.72

Industry

CVI

Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing

BTU

Thermal Coal

P/E Ratio

Winner

CVI

-58.51

BTU

-33.55

Forward P/E

CVI

32.47

Winner

BTU

24.69

Dividend Yield

Winner

CVI

1.45%

BTU

1.22%

5Y Dividends CAGR

CVI

46.83%

BTU

N/A

Debt to Equity

CVI

315.99%

Winner

BTU

0.00%

Free Cash Flow Yield

Winner

CVI

12.52%

BTU

-5.21%

CVI vs BTU - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	CVI	BTU
1 month	-0.86%	-2.32%
3 months	+34.89%	-16.16%
6 months	-5.29%	-1.77%
1 year	+36.58%	+84.78%
5 years(CAGR)	+27.15%	+33.59%
10 years(CAGR)	+17.92%	-0.16%
Max(CAGR)	+11.79%	-0.16%

Winner

CVI

-0.86%

BTU

-2.32%

Winner

CVI

+34.89%

BTU

-16.16%

CVI

-5.29%

Winner

BTU

-1.77%

CVI

+36.58%

Winner

BTU

+84.78%

5Y(CAGR)

CVI

+27.15%

Winner

BTU

+33.59%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

CVI

+17.92%

BTU

-0.16%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

CVI

+11.79%

BTU

-0.16%

CVI vs BTU - Annual Returns (2007 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	CVI	BTU
2026	+29.37%	-13.61%
2025	+49.35%	+44.81%
2024	-36.66%	-13.07%
2023	+18.93%	-2.16%
2022	+161.28%	+132.98%
2021	+27.80%	+242.52%
2020	-61.47%	-75.88%
2019	+22.98%	-67.95%
2018	-1.46%	-21.75%
2017	+63.56%	+27.00%
2016	-24.56%	N/A
2015	+3.47%	N/A
2014	-1.42%	N/A
2013	+12.16%	N/A
2012	+147.41%	N/A
2011	+20.76%	N/A
2010	+104.31%	N/A
2009	+62.17%	N/A
2008	-84.00%	N/A
2007	+23.16%	N/A

CVI vs BTU Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CVI was -92.39%, occurring on Oct 29, 2008. Recovery took 1006 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for BTU was -98.07%, occurring on Nov 10, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current CVI drawdown is -18.55%. The current BTU drawdown is -36.01%.

Rank	CVI	BTU
#1	-92.39% Feb 27, 2008 - Feb 23, 2012	-98.07% Jun 14, 2018 - Nov 10, 2020
#2	-80.24% Jul 26, 2019 - May 27, 2022	-25.77% Apr 3, 2017 - Nov 1, 2017
#3	-73.15% May 28, 2013 - May 14, 2018	-13.95% Feb 15, 2018 - May 17, 2018
#4	-56.17% Apr 3, 2024 - Sep 9, 2025	-8.07% Jan 26, 2018 - Feb 14, 2018
#5	-48.21% Oct 27, 2025 - Feb 20, 2026	-3.03% May 21, 2018 - May 30, 2018
#6	-42.25% Nov 15, 2022 - Feb 15, 2024	-2.54% Nov 6, 2017 - Nov 20, 2017
#7	-35.04% Jun 7, 2022 - Oct 21, 2022	-2.54% Jan 12, 2018 - Jan 26, 2018
#8	-31.38% May 21, 2018 - Apr 12, 2019	-2.20% Jun 7, 2018 - Jun 14, 2018
#9	-25.81% Mar 5, 2013 - May 17, 2013	-2.12% Dec 1, 2017 - Dec 7, 2017
#10	-23.60% May 21, 2012 - Sep 6, 2012	-0.99% Dec 28, 2017 - Jan 5, 2018
#11	-13.74% Feb 23, 2012 - Apr 19, 2012	-0.97% Dec 26, 2017 - Dec 28, 2017
#12	-12.39% Oct 1, 2012 - Nov 19, 2012	-0.89% Dec 13, 2017 - Dec 18, 2017
#13	-10.51% Oct 2, 2025 - Oct 23, 2025	-0.89% Nov 24, 2017 - Nov 28, 2017
#14	-10.35% Oct 26, 2007 - Dec 17, 2007	-0.84% May 17, 2018 - May 21, 2018
#15	-10.12% May 21, 2019 - Jun 20, 2019	-0.57% Nov 1, 2017 - Nov 6, 2017

Correlation

Correlation between CVI and BTU is 0.45 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.

0.45

-101

Dividend Comparison (2013 - 2026)

CVI vs BTU dividend yield comparison.

Year	CVI	BTU
2026	1.47%	0.57%
2025	8.88%	1.01%
2024	8.00%	1.43%
2023	14.85%	0.93%
2022	32.04%	0.00%
2021	14.28%	0.00%
2020	8.05%	0.00%
2019	7.54%	26.43%
2018	7.25%	1.59%
2017	5.37%	0.00%
2016	7.88%	0.00%
2015	5.08%	0.00%
2014	12.92%	0.00%
2013	32.81%	0.00%