CTW vs EML
Comparison between CTW Cayman - Class A (CTW, Company) and Eastern Company (EML, Company).
CTW is from the Communication Services sector, while EML is from the Industrials sector.
CTW vs EML - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
Market Cap
Winner
CTW
$155M
EML
$154M
Max Drawdown
Winner
CTW
72.75%
EML
75.58%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
CTW
0.59
EML
0.30
5Y Beta
CTW
0.74
Winner
EML
0.65
Industry
CTW
Electronic Gaming & Multimedia
EML
Tools & Accessories
P/E Ratio
CTW
40.43
Winner
EML
19.23
Forward P/E
CTW
N/A
EML
9.61
PEG Ratio
CTW
N/A
EML
1.15
Dividend Yield
CTW
N/A
EML
1.78%
5Y Dividends CAGR
CTW
N/A
EML
4.56%
5Y EPS CAGR
CTW
N/A
EML
7.60%
Debt to Equity
Winner
CTW
0.00%
EML
32.07%
Free Cash Flow Yield
CTW
-0.31%
Winner
EML
9.81%
P/S Ratio
CTW
1.92
Winner
EML
0.62
P/B Ratio
CTW
4.24
Winner
EML
1.20
CTW vs EML - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
1M
Winner
CTW
+4.53%
EML
+0.63%
3M
CTW
-7.97%
Winner
EML
+26.59%
6M
Winner
CTW
+73.13%
EML
+37.89%
1Y
Winner
CTW
+30.66%
EML
+11.93%
5Y(CAGR)
CTW
N/A
EML
+0.58%
10Y(CAGR)
CTW
N/A
EML
+4.98%
Max(CAGR)
CTW
-37.00%
Winner
EML
+5.91%
CTW vs EML - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CTW | EML |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +53.04% | +31.49% |
| 2025 | -61.04% | -24.60% |
| 2024 | N/A | +23.96% |
| 2023 | N/A | +13.68% |
| 2022 | N/A | -23.08% |
| 2021 | N/A | +11.14% |
| 2020 | N/A | -17.61% |
| 2019 | N/A | +21.13% |
| 2018 | N/A | -6.94% |
| 2017 | N/A | +32.09% |
| 2016 | N/A | +12.90% |
| 2015 | N/A | +4.20% |
| 2014 | N/A | +8.47% |
| 2013 | N/A | -0.24% |
| 2012 | N/A | -16.95% |
| 2011 | N/A | +14.23% |
| 2010 | N/A | +36.69% |
| 2009 | N/A | +54.80% |
| 2008 | N/A | -50.78% |
| 2007 | N/A | -4.95% |
| 2006 | N/A | +53.51% |
| 2005 | N/A | -0.52% |
| 2004 | N/A | +32.17% |
| 2003 | N/A | +46.15% |
| 2002 | N/A | -3.38% |
| 2001 | N/A | -6.55% |
| 2000 | N/A | -13.40% |
| 1999 | N/A | +2.34% |
CTW vs EML Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CTW was -72.75%, occurring on Feb 5, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for EML was -74.76%, occurring on Dec 29, 2008. Recovery took 2488 trading sessions.
The current CTW drawdown is -37.61%. The current EML drawdown is -23.11%.
| Rank | CTW | EML |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -72.75% Aug 6, 2025 - Feb 5, 2026 | -74.76% Jun 5, 2007 - Apr 21, 2017 |
| #2 | N/A | -51.23% Jun 3, 2021 - Mar 25, 2024 |
| #3 | N/A | -48.80% Jan 16, 2020 - May 10, 2021 |
| #4 | N/A | -47.01% Oct 17, 2024 - Jan 28, 2026 |
| #5 | N/A | -30.64% Mar 27, 2024 - Oct 17, 2024 |
| #6 | N/A | -30.18% Feb 7, 2001 - Jul 16, 2003 |
| #7 | N/A | -29.44% May 21, 2018 - Dec 16, 2019 |
| #8 | N/A | -28.14% Jan 20, 2000 - Jan 22, 2001 |
| #9 | N/A | -25.58% Aug 17, 2005 - Sep 29, 2006 |
| #10 | N/A | -21.53% Jun 5, 2017 - May 21, 2018 |
| #11 | N/A | -17.95% Apr 24, 2007 - May 29, 2007 |
| #12 | N/A | -16.20% Feb 8, 2007 - Mar 12, 2007 |
| #13 | N/A | -15.03% Mar 1, 2005 - Jul 1, 2005 |
| #14 | N/A | -12.82% Oct 2, 2006 - Dec 26, 2006 |
| #15 | N/A | -12.13% Mar 12, 2007 - Apr 16, 2007 |
Correlation
Correlation between CTW and EML is 0.74 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
0.74
-101
Select Stocks to Compare
Popular: CTW vs SPYEML vs SPY
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks