CTSH vs NMR
Comparison between Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp - Class A (CTSH, Company) and Nomura Holdings Inc (NMR, Company).
CTSH is from the Technology sector, while NMR is from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceNMR has outperformed CTSH, delivering a return of +11.8% compared to -5.6%
CTSH vs NMR - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CTSH vs NMR - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CTSH vs NMR - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CTSH | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -36.10% | -5.92% |
| 2025 | +10.38% | +53.57% |
| 2024 | +5.04% | +35.63% |
| 2023 | +33.43% | +21.20% |
| 2022 | -35.16% | -12.30% |
| 2021 | +13.13% | -17.05% |
| 2020 | +34.18% | +3.34% |
| 2019 | -0.47% | +35.43% |
| 2018 | -9.57% | -36.95% |
| 2017 | +26.47% | -0.51% |
| 2016 | -3.61% | +10.26% |
| 2015 | +13.95% | +0.64% |
| 2014 | +6.56% | -23.82% |
| 2013 | +32.62% | +29.46% |
| 2012 | +12.42% | +92.81% |
| 2011 | -14.66% | -52.04% |
| 2010 | +56.60% | -14.33% |
| 2009 | +137.08% | -11.17% |
| 2008 | -43.97% | -49.10% |
| 2007 | -12.71% | -11.80% |
| 2006 | +52.28% | -1.99% |
| 2005 | +20.18% | +34.20% |
| 2004 | +79.90% | -14.69% |
| 2003 | +89.51% | +52.55% |
| 2002 | +88.30% | -13.30% |
| 2001 | +23.70% | -29.05% |
| 2000 | -24.36% | +2.57% |
| 1999 | +114.82% | +11.76% |
CTSH vs NMR Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CTSH was -71.38%, occurring on Oct 8, 2001. Recovery took 653 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for NMR was -89.30%, occurring on Nov 23, 2011. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current CTSH drawdown is -41.82%. The current NMR drawdown is -61.02%.
| Rank | CTSH | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -71.38% Mar 28, 2000 - Nov 4, 2002 | -89.30% Mar 31, 2000 - Nov 23, 2011 |
| #2 | -69.06% Feb 7, 2007 - Jan 13, 2010 | -20.52% Feb 11, 2000 - Mar 29, 2000 |
| #3 | -49.77% Mar 15, 2018 - May 3, 2021 | -11.59% Nov 26, 1999 - Jan 4, 2000 |
| #4 | -43.77% Mar 22, 2022 - Feb 13, 2025 | -11.04% Jan 4, 2000 - Jan 18, 2000 |
| #5 | -42.21% Feb 14, 2025 - May 6, 2026 | -4.76% Nov 12, 1999 - Nov 22, 1999 |
| #6 | -35.68% Dec 22, 1999 - Feb 8, 2000 | -4.45% Jan 24, 2000 - Jan 27, 2000 |
| #7 | -34.31% Apr 29, 2011 - Sep 18, 2013 | -4.04% Jan 18, 2000 - Jan 21, 2000 |
| #8 | -31.60% Oct 28, 2015 - Jul 20, 2017 | -3.28% Jan 31, 2000 - Feb 3, 2000 |
| #9 | -30.65% Dec 23, 2002 - Jul 2, 2003 | -2.21% Nov 1, 1999 - Nov 10, 1999 |
| #10 | -28.10% Jan 23, 2004 - Sep 9, 2004 | -0.87% Jan 27, 2000 - Jan 31, 2000 |
| #11 | -25.36% Mar 9, 2000 - Mar 24, 2000 | N/A |
| #12 | -19.21% Mar 7, 2014 - Nov 7, 2014 | N/A |
| #13 | -18.87% May 3, 2021 - Nov 12, 2021 | N/A |
| #14 | -17.85% Mar 4, 2005 - Jun 15, 2005 | N/A |
| #15 | -17.00% Feb 11, 2000 - Mar 9, 2000 | N/A |
Correlation
Correlation between CTSH and NMR is -0.64 which considered as a moderate negative correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move in opposite directions.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
CTSH vs NMR dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CTSH | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.64% | 0.00% |
| 2025 | 1.49% | 4.91% |
| 2024 | 1.56% | 4.29% |
| 2023 | 1.54% | 1.20% |
| 2022 | 1.89% | 3.86% |
| 2021 | 1.08% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 1.07% | 0.86% |
| 2019 | 1.29% | 0.00% |
| 2018 | 1.26% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 0.63% | 1.70% |
| 2016 | 0.00% | 1.79% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 3.34% |
| 2014 | 0.00% | 2.44% |
| 2013 | 0.00% | 1.77% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 1.28% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 5.11% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 1.37% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 0.57% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 2.85% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 2.36% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 1.07% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 1.08% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 1.05% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 5.57% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 6.49% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks