StockComparison Logo
vs

CTSH vs LNT

Comparison between Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp - Class A (CTSH, Company) and Alliant Energy Corp (LNT, Company).

CTSH is from the Technology sector, while LNT is from the Utilities sector.

5-Year PerformanceLNT has outperformed CTSH, delivering a return of +9.4% compared to -9.6%

CTSH vs LNT - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
CTSH
$20B
LNT
$20B
Max Drawdown
CTSH
71.38%
Winner
LNT
58.43%
Sharpe Ratio
CTSH
-1.68
Winner
LNT
1.37
5Y Beta
CTSH
0.75
Winner
LNT
0.14
Industry
CTSH
Information Technology Services
LNT
Utilities - Regulated Electric
P/E Ratio
Winner
CTSH
8.94
LNT
23.70
Forward P/E
Winner
CTSH
7.26
LNT
21.93
PEG Ratio
CTSH
N/A
LNT
2.39
Dividend Yield
Winner
CTSH
3.13%
LNT
2.81%
5Y Dividends CAGR
Winner
CTSH
12.05%
LNT
10.62%
5Y EPS CAGR
Winner
CTSH
10.11%
LNT
4.98%
Debt to Equity
Winner
CTSH
3.77%
LNT
148.30%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
CTSH
12.57%
LNT
-7.55%

CTSH vs LNT - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
CTSH
-24.44%
Winner
LNT
+3.41%
3M
CTSH
-34.10%
Winner
LNT
+10.00%
6M
CTSH
-53.65%
Winner
LNT
+18.21%
1Y
CTSH
-48.11%
Winner
LNT
+30.74%
5Y(CAGR)
CTSH
-9.62%
Winner
LNT
+9.39%
10Y(CAGR)
CTSH
-2.58%
Winner
LNT
+10.24%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
CTSH
+15.07%
LNT
+10.99%

CTSH vs LNT - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearCTSHLNT
2026-51.28%+17.96%
2025+10.38%+14.75%
2024+5.04%+18.16%
2023+33.43%-4.12%
2022-35.16%-6.56%
2021+13.13%+25.37%
2020+34.18%-1.20%
2019-0.47%+36.97%
2018-9.57%+3.57%
2017+26.47%+15.92%
2016-3.61%+25.78%
2015+13.95%-2.74%
2014+6.56%+35.56%
2013+32.62%+18.62%
2012+12.42%+3.98%
2011-14.66%+23.95%
2010+56.60%+26.88%
2009+137.08%+7.94%
2008-43.97%-24.47%
2007-12.71%+10.97%
2006+52.28%+37.17%
2005+20.18%+3.68%
2004+79.90%+19.82%
2003+89.51%+54.50%
2002+88.30%-40.82%
2001+23.70%+4.65%
2000-24.36%+27.20%
1999+114.82%-1.11%

CTSH vs LNT Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CTSH was -71.38%, occurring on Oct 8, 2001. Recovery took 653 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for LNT was -51.65%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 958 trading sessions.

The current CTSH drawdown is -55.64%.

RankCTSHLNT
#1-71.38%
Mar 28, 2000 - Nov 4, 2002
-51.65%
Apr 25, 2007 - Feb 10, 2011
#2-69.06%
Feb 7, 2007 - Jan 13, 2010
-50.02%
Oct 3, 2001 - Jul 19, 2004
#3-55.64%
Feb 14, 2025 - Jun 25, 2026
-33.54%
Feb 18, 2020 - May 21, 2021
#4-49.77%
Mar 15, 2018 - May 3, 2021
-25.62%
Aug 17, 2022 - Sep 16, 2024
#5-43.77%
Mar 22, 2022 - Feb 13, 2025
-22.38%
Jan 24, 2000 - Feb 9, 2001
#6-35.68%
Dec 22, 1999 - Feb 8, 2000
-21.03%
Jan 29, 2015 - Feb 8, 2016
#7-34.31%
Apr 29, 2011 - Sep 18, 2013
-17.13%
Jul 7, 2011 - Oct 21, 2011
#8-31.60%
Oct 28, 2015 - Jul 20, 2017
-17.09%
Nov 14, 2017 - Oct 8, 2018
#9-30.65%
Dec 23, 2002 - Jul 2, 2003
-15.39%
Apr 6, 2022 - Aug 17, 2022
#10-28.10%
Jan 23, 2004 - Sep 9, 2004
-13.98%
Sep 6, 2005 - Feb 2, 2006
#11-25.36%
Mar 9, 2000 - Mar 24, 2000
-13.89%
Feb 26, 2001 - Oct 3, 2001
#12-19.21%
Mar 7, 2014 - Nov 7, 2014
-12.15%
Jul 5, 2016 - Mar 24, 2017
#13-18.87%
May 3, 2021 - Nov 12, 2021
-12.09%
Aug 20, 2021 - Mar 25, 2022
#14-17.85%
Mar 4, 2005 - Jun 15, 2005
-11.59%
Apr 30, 2013 - Jul 18, 2013
#15-17.00%
Feb 11, 2000 - Mar 9, 2000
-11.08%
Dec 11, 2018 - Mar 4, 2019

Correlation

Correlation between CTSH and LNT is 0.90 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.90
-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

CTSH vs LNT dividend yield comparison.

YearCTSHLNT
20261.69%1.40%
20251.49%3.12%
20241.56%3.25%
20231.54%3.53%
20221.89%3.10%
20211.08%2.62%
20201.07%2.95%
20191.29%2.60%
20181.26%3.17%
20170.63%2.96%
20160.00%3.10%
20150.00%3.52%
20140.00%3.07%
20130.00%3.64%
20120.00%3.07%
20110.00%3.85%
20100.00%4.30%
20090.00%4.96%
20080.00%4.80%
20070.00%3.12%
20060.00%3.05%
20050.00%3.75%
20040.00%3.54%
20030.00%4.02%
20020.00%12.08%
20010.00%6.59%
20000.00%6.27%

Select Stocks to Compare