StockComparison Logo
vs

CTS vs ALG

Comparison between CTS Corp (CTS, Company) and Alamo Group Inc (ALG, Company).

CTS is from the Technology sector, while ALG is from the Industrials sector.

5-Year PerformanceCTS has outperformed ALG, delivering a return of +10.7% compared to +0.2%

CTS vs ALG - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
CTS
$1.87B
ALG
$1.86B
Max Drawdown
CTS
97.46%
Winner
ALG
66.95%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
CTS
1.30
ALG
-0.94
5Y Beta
CTS
1.27
Winner
ALG
0.80
Industry
CTS
Electronic Components
ALG
Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery
P/E Ratio
CTS
27.35
Winner
ALG
18.38
Forward P/E
CTS
25.84
Winner
ALG
14.60
PEG Ratio
CTS
1.11
Winner
ALG
0.92
Dividend Yield
CTS
0.24%
Winner
ALG
0.82%
5Y Dividends CAGR
CTS
4.56%
Winner
ALG
23.95%
5Y EPS CAGR
Winner
CTS
12.42%
ALG
10.62%
Debt to Equity
CTS
0.00%
ALG
0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield
CTS
5.57%
Winner
ALG
5.94%
P/S Ratio
CTS
3.36
Winner
ALG
1.15
P/B Ratio
CTS
3.34
Winner
ALG
1.58

CTS vs ALG - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
CTS
+8.24%
ALG
-10.65%
3M
Winner
CTS
+22.89%
ALG
-13.65%
6M
Winner
CTS
+41.62%
ALG
-9.16%
1Y
Winner
CTS
+52.34%
ALG
-26.84%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
CTS
+10.66%
ALG
+0.24%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
CTS
+13.50%
ALG
+9.75%
Max(CAGR)
CTS
+1.16%
Winner
ALG
+12.32%

CTS vs ALG - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearCTSALG
2026+43.46%-12.13%
2025-17.07%-6.22%
2024+21.19%-9.25%
2023+9.42%+50.61%
2022+5.43%-4.56%
2021+9.54%+7.25%
2020+13.64%+10.26%
2019+16.75%+64.56%
2018-1.78%-30.85%
2017+15.23%+46.26%
2016+31.83%+50.25%
2015+2.50%+6.84%
2014-8.65%-14.56%
2013+78.80%+79.23%
2012+13.01%+19.76%
2011-18.84%-3.16%
2010+8.05%+57.07%
2009+66.48%+11.17%
2008-43.87%-15.72%
2007-36.06%-21.67%
2006+33.73%+13.81%
2005-16.19%-26.51%
2004+12.87%+77.52%
2003+37.89%+24.93%
2002-50.02%-12.51%
2001-55.60%+7.85%
2000-51.12%+31.70%
1999+29.73%+17.14%

CTS vs ALG Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CTS was -97.23%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for ALG was -65.37%, occurring on Mar 11, 2009. Recovery took 1476 trading sessions.

The current CTS drawdown is -7.64%. The current ALG drawdown is -35.46%.

RankCTSALG
#1-97.23%
Dec 7, 1999 - Mar 9, 2009
-65.37%
Jan 24, 2005 - Dec 2, 2010
#2-4.49%
Nov 18, 1999 - Nov 29, 1999
-42.47%
Jan 17, 2020 - Nov 5, 2020
#3-1.84%
Nov 1, 1999 - Nov 3, 1999
-38.25%
Jan 26, 2018 - Sep 11, 2019
#4-1.81%
Nov 15, 1999 - Nov 17, 1999
-36.60%
Dec 31, 2013 - Mar 20, 2015
#5-1.26%
Nov 11, 1999 - Nov 15, 1999
-36.29%
Aug 13, 2025 - May 15, 2026
#6-0.24%
Nov 30, 1999 - Dec 2, 1999
-33.07%
May 7, 2021 - Feb 24, 2023
#7N/A-32.60%
Apr 10, 2002 - Feb 9, 2004
#8N/A-30.92%
Apr 28, 2015 - Jun 17, 2016
#9N/A-30.65%
Feb 28, 2011 - Jan 18, 2012
#10N/A-30.20%
Mar 28, 2024 - Jul 10, 2025
#11N/A-21.92%
Feb 25, 2004 - Sep 27, 2004
#12N/A-19.80%
Jul 24, 2023 - Dec 14, 2023
#13N/A-19.31%
May 2, 2012 - Oct 4, 2012
#14N/A-17.60%
Mar 2, 2001 - Mar 20, 2002
#15N/A-17.48%
Oct 30, 2019 - Jan 17, 2020

Correlation

Correlation between CTS and ALG is 0.79 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.79
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

CTS vs ALG dividend yield comparison.

YearCTSALG
20260.06%0.46%
20250.37%0.71%
20240.30%0.56%
20230.37%0.42%
20220.41%0.51%
20210.44%0.38%
20200.47%0.38%
20190.53%0.38%
20180.62%0.57%
20170.62%0.35%
20160.71%0.47%
20150.91%0.61%
20140.90%0.58%
20130.73%0.46%
20121.32%0.74%
20111.36%0.89%
20101.08%0.86%
20091.25%1.40%
20082.18%1.61%
20071.21%1.32%
20060.76%1.02%
20051.08%1.17%
20040.90%0.88%
20031.04%1.57%
20021.55%1.96%
20010.75%1.68%
20000.33%1.84%
19990.04%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare