CTM vs BDL

Comparison between Castellum Inc (CTM, Company) and Flanigan`s Enterprises Inc (BDL, Company).

CTM is from the Technology sector, while BDL is from the Consumer Cyclical sector.

5-Year PerformanceBDL has outperformed CTM, delivering a return of +2.2% compared to -32.3%

CTM vs BDL - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	CTM(COMPANY)	BDL(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$66M	$65M
Max Drawdown	98.04%	78.19%
Sharpe Ratio	-0.60	0.42
5Y Beta	1.48	0.12
Industry	Information Technology Services	Restaurants
P/E Ratio	-41.33	10.97
PEG Ratio	N/A	0.23
Dividend Yield	N/A	1.58%
Debt to Equity	0.00%	28.95%
Free Cash Flow Yield	2.56%	9.78%
P/S Ratio	1.19	0.32
P/B Ratio	1.82	0.89

Market Cap

Winner

CTM

$66M

BDL

$65M

Max Drawdown

CTM

98.04%

Winner

BDL

78.19%

Sharpe Ratio

CTM

-0.60

Winner

BDL

0.42

5Y Beta

CTM

1.48

Winner

BDL

0.12

Industry

CTM

Information Technology Services

BDL

Restaurants

P/E Ratio

Winner

CTM

-41.33

BDL

10.97

PEG Ratio

CTM

N/A

BDL

0.23

Dividend Yield

CTM

N/A

BDL

1.58%

Debt to Equity

Winner

CTM

0.00%

BDL

28.95%

Free Cash Flow Yield

CTM

2.56%

Winner

BDL

9.78%

P/S Ratio

CTM

1.19

Winner

BDL

0.32

P/B Ratio

CTM

1.82

Winner

BDL

0.89

CTM vs BDL - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	CTM	BDL
1 month	+5.89%	+20.28%
3 months	-13.25%	+10.20%
6 months	-31.84%	+23.00%
1 year	-39.35%	+24.44%
5 years(CAGR)	-32.35%	+2.21%
10 years(CAGR)	-8.81%	+6.89%
Max(CAGR)	-8.81%	+9.52%

CTM

+5.89%

Winner

BDL

+20.28%

CTM

-13.25%

Winner

BDL

+10.20%

CTM

-31.84%

Winner

BDL

+23.00%

CTM

-39.35%

Winner

BDL

+24.44%

5Y(CAGR)

CTM

-32.35%

Winner

BDL

+2.21%

10Y(CAGR)

CTM

-8.81%

Winner

BDL

+6.89%

Max(CAGR)

CTM

-8.81%

Winner

BDL

+9.52%

CTM vs BDL - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	CTM	BDL
2026	-26.75%	+28.60%
2025	-48.97%	+22.46%
2024	+587.29%	+0.57%
2023	-74.95%	-0.30%
2022	-62.39%	-13.29%
2021	+87.50%	+56.23%
2020	-30.73%	-8.24%
2019	+653.52%	-11.86%
2018	-83.78%	+9.85%
2017	-18.87%	-3.64%
2016	N/A	+11.79%
2015	N/A	-27.31%
2014	N/A	+129.01%
2013	N/A	+70.97%
2012	N/A	+15.74%
2011	N/A	-21.73%
2010	N/A	+68.47%
2009	N/A	+61.08%
2008	N/A	-55.16%
2007	N/A	-21.92%
2006	N/A	+3.86%
2005	N/A	+49.26%
2004	N/A	+9.85%
2003	N/A	+18.60%
2002	N/A	+10.11%
2001	N/A	+48.99%
2000	N/A	-22.02%
1999	N/A	-15.11%

CTM vs BDL Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CTM was -98.04%, occurring on Aug 7, 2024. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for BDL was -76.66%, occurring on Mar 20, 2020. Recovery took 1612 trading sessions.

The current CTM drawdown is -89.78%.

Rank	CTM	BDL
#1	-98.04% Jun 1, 2021 - Aug 7, 2024	-76.66% Feb 3, 2015 - Jun 29, 2021
#2	-96.64% Nov 20, 2017 - Nov 6, 2019	-76.44% Feb 26, 2007 - May 21, 2013
#3	-55.20% Nov 27, 2019 - Apr 27, 2021	-42.52% Jul 6, 2021 - Jun 15, 2026
#4	-38.47% Nov 6, 2019 - Nov 18, 2019	-37.39% Nov 3, 1999 - Jul 23, 2001
#5	-33.05% Sep 28, 2017 - Nov 20, 2017	-34.99% Jul 11, 2006 - Feb 21, 2007
#6	-17.21% Nov 18, 2019 - Nov 27, 2019	-32.54% Jul 25, 2001 - Jan 7, 2002
#7	-14.00% Apr 27, 2021 - May 10, 2021	-30.59% May 17, 2002 - Dec 22, 2003
#8	-7.37% May 13, 2021 - May 19, 2021	-29.77% May 22, 2013 - Dec 18, 2013
#9	-2.38% May 10, 2021 - May 12, 2021	-25.70% Dec 2, 2014 - Jan 30, 2015
#10	-1.27% May 26, 2021 - May 28, 2021	-22.68% Mar 3, 2005 - Jul 1, 2005
#11	N/A	-15.57% Oct 9, 2014 - Oct 30, 2014
#12	N/A	-15.54% Mar 5, 2014 - Aug 28, 2014
#13	N/A	-11.39% Jan 12, 2005 - Feb 9, 2005
#14	N/A	-10.46% Dec 26, 2013 - Jan 17, 2014
#15	N/A	-10.38% Jan 14, 2004 - Nov 9, 2004