CTAS vs NGG
Comparison between Cintas Corporation (CTAS, Company) and National Grid Plc (NGG, Company).
CTAS is from the Industrials sector, while NGG is from the Utilities sector.
5-Year PerformanceCTAS has outperformed NGG, delivering a return of +16.9% compared to +10.0%
CTAS vs NGG - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CTAS vs NGG - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CTAS vs NGG - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CTAS | NGG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +11.07% | +4.05% |
| 2025 | +4.13% | +35.55% |
| 2024 | +24.46% | -1.37% |
| 2023 | +35.60% | +18.47% |
| 2022 | +7.60% | -12.68% |
| 2021 | +30.13% | +27.55% |
| 2020 | +31.88% | -0.29% |
| 2019 | +62.22% | +36.32% |
| 2018 | +8.31% | -13.76% |
| 2017 | +35.46% | +5.34% |
| 2016 | +32.58% | -11.59% |
| 2015 | +17.39% | +4.24% |
| 2014 | +36.02% | +18.64% |
| 2013 | +43.96% | +19.36% |
| 2012 | +17.86% | +24.11% |
| 2011 | +26.66% | +16.29% |
| 2010 | +9.94% | -3.73% |
| 2009 | +11.53% | +13.70% |
| 2008 | -27.16% | -35.36% |
| 2007 | -16.06% | +19.98% |
| 2006 | -3.44% | +51.47% |
| 2005 | -4.02% | +7.26% |
| 2004 | -11.61% | +36.00% |
| 2003 | +7.44% | +5.99% |
| 2002 | -5.38% | +21.76% |
| 2001 | -4.28% | -28.67% |
| 2000 | +53.86% | N/A |
| 1999 | -12.73% | N/A |
CTAS vs NGG Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CTAS was -65.30%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 2829 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for NGG was -54.85%, occurring on Mar 30, 2009. Recovery took 1335 trading sessions.
The current CTAS drawdown is -9.40%. The current NGG drawdown is -12.82%.
| Rank | CTAS | NGG |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -65.30% May 14, 2002 - Aug 8, 2013 | -54.85% Dec 10, 2007 - Apr 2, 2013 |
| #2 | -48.38% Feb 19, 2020 - Jul 29, 2020 | -39.19% Apr 6, 2022 - May 15, 2024 |
| #3 | -39.89% Nov 1, 1999 - Apr 4, 2000 | -34.04% Feb 21, 2020 - May 10, 2021 |
| #4 | -36.22% Dec 26, 2000 - May 7, 2002 | -31.57% Feb 1, 2001 - Mar 1, 2004 |
| #5 | -27.67% Jun 6, 2025 - May 13, 2026 | -31.39% May 19, 2017 - Jan 21, 2020 |
| #6 | -27.09% Sep 6, 2018 - Apr 24, 2019 | -22.71% Jul 5, 2016 - May 17, 2017 |
| #7 | -23.85% Dec 10, 2021 - Nov 22, 2022 | -20.76% May 16, 2024 - Aug 23, 2024 |
| #8 | -23.77% Jun 2, 2000 - Nov 7, 2000 | -19.07% Sep 23, 2024 - Apr 3, 2025 |
| #9 | -19.60% Nov 26, 2024 - May 27, 2025 | -15.15% Nov 26, 2014 - Oct 20, 2015 |
| #10 | -16.42% Apr 4, 2000 - Apr 25, 2000 | -14.15% Feb 25, 2026 - May 15, 2026 |
| #11 | -13.75% Dec 1, 2015 - May 24, 2016 | -13.87% Sep 6, 2005 - Jan 30, 2006 |
| #12 | -13.73% Nov 27, 2000 - Dec 26, 2000 | -12.20% Feb 16, 2005 - Sep 6, 2005 |
| #13 | -13.71% Nov 16, 2020 - Jun 22, 2021 | -11.43% Apr 3, 2007 - Sep 25, 2007 |
| #14 | -12.80% Sep 6, 2016 - Dec 5, 2016 | -11.07% May 14, 2013 - Oct 22, 2013 |
| #15 | -12.41% May 16, 2000 - May 30, 2000 | -11.01% Aug 18, 2021 - Dec 3, 2021 |
Correlation
Correlation between CTAS and NGG is 0.88 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
CTAS vs NGG dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CTAS | NGG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.70% | 2.73% |
| 2025 | 0.89% | 4.03% |
| 2024 | 0.80% | 11.81% |
| 2023 | 0.83% | 5.20% |
| 2022 | 0.93% | 5.18% |
| 2021 | 0.77% | 4.75% |
| 2020 | 0.99% | 5.32% |
| 2019 | 0.95% | 4.94% |
| 2018 | 1.22% | 6.51% |
| 2017 | 1.04% | 14.95% |
| 2016 | 1.15% | 5.07% |
| 2015 | 1.15% | 4.73% |
| 2014 | 2.17% | 8.13% |
| 2013 | 1.29% | 4.82% |
| 2012 | 1.56% | 5.51% |
| 2011 | 1.55% | 6.18% |
| 2010 | 3.47% | 15.84% |
| 2009 | 1.80% | 5.32% |
| 2008 | 1.98% | 5.94% |
| 2007 | 1.16% | 3.57% |
| 2006 | 0.88% | 3.50% |
| 2005 | 0.78% | 4.66% |
| 2004 | 0.66% | 3.83% |
| 2003 | 0.54% | 4.16% |
| 2002 | 0.55% | 3.99% |
| 2001 | 0.46% | 7.22% |
| 2000 | 0.35% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks