CTAS vs MMC
Comparison between Cintas Corporation (CTAS, Company) and Marsh & McLennan Cos. Inc (MMC, Company).
CTAS is from the Industrials sector, while MMC is from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceCTAS has outperformed MMC, delivering a return of +16.8% compared to +11.6%
CTAS vs MMC - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CTAS vs MMC - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CTAS vs MMC - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CTAS | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +11.24% | +0.13% |
| 2025 | +4.13% | -10.82% |
| 2024 | +24.46% | +13.32% |
| 2023 | +35.60% | +15.80% |
| 2022 | +7.60% | +0.36% |
| 2021 | +30.13% | +55.45% |
| 2020 | +31.88% | +6.23% |
| 2019 | +62.22% | +43.61% |
| 2018 | +8.31% | +1.10% |
| 2017 | +35.46% | +22.21% |
| 2016 | +32.58% | +27.11% |
| 2015 | +17.39% | -0.59% |
| 2014 | +36.02% | +22.56% |
| 2013 | +43.96% | +39.55% |
| 2012 | +17.86% | +11.34% |
| 2011 | +26.66% | +18.61% |
| 2010 | +9.94% | +29.45% |
| 2009 | +11.53% | -7.96% |
| 2008 | -27.16% | -7.32% |
| 2007 | -16.06% | -13.10% |
| 2006 | -3.44% | -1.53% |
| 2005 | -4.02% | -1.20% |
| 2004 | -11.61% | -29.98% |
| 2003 | +7.44% | +3.15% |
| 2002 | -5.38% | -11.41% |
| 2001 | -4.28% | -3.28% |
| 2000 | +53.86% | +26.01% |
| 1999 | -12.73% | +24.06% |
CTAS vs MMC Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CTAS was -65.30%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 2829 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for MMC was -67.50%, occurring on Mar 2, 2009. Recovery took 3298 trading sessions.
The current CTAS drawdown is -9.26%. The current MMC drawdown is -24.54%.
| Rank | CTAS | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -65.30% May 14, 2002 - Aug 8, 2013 | -67.50% Oct 5, 2000 - Nov 15, 2013 |
| #2 | -48.38% Feb 19, 2020 - Jul 29, 2020 | -35.80% Feb 18, 2020 - Aug 5, 2020 |
| #3 | -39.89% Nov 1, 1999 - Apr 4, 2000 | -29.74% Jan 14, 2000 - Mar 31, 2000 |
| #4 | -36.22% Dec 26, 2000 - May 7, 2002 | -27.07% Apr 3, 2025 - Nov 6, 2025 |
| #5 | -27.67% Jun 6, 2025 - May 13, 2026 | -19.23% Apr 21, 2022 - Apr 20, 2023 |
| #6 | -27.09% Sep 6, 2018 - Apr 24, 2019 | -16.41% Mar 31, 2000 - May 30, 2000 |
| #7 | -23.85% Dec 10, 2021 - Nov 22, 2022 | -15.24% Dec 3, 2018 - Feb 1, 2019 |
| #8 | -23.77% Jun 2, 2000 - Nov 7, 2000 | -14.99% Dec 27, 2021 - Apr 7, 2022 |
| #9 | -19.60% Nov 26, 2024 - May 27, 2025 | -13.40% Jun 18, 2015 - Mar 14, 2016 |
| #10 | -16.42% Apr 4, 2000 - Apr 25, 2000 | -13.07% Sep 2, 2020 - Dec 17, 2020 |
| #11 | -13.75% Dec 1, 2015 - May 24, 2016 | -11.58% Jul 18, 2018 - Nov 8, 2018 |
| #12 | -13.73% Nov 27, 2000 - Dec 26, 2000 | -10.62% Nov 27, 2024 - Feb 24, 2025 |
| #13 | -13.71% Nov 16, 2020 - Jun 22, 2021 | -9.87% May 31, 2000 - Jul 20, 2000 |
| #14 | -12.80% Sep 6, 2016 - Dec 5, 2016 | -9.34% Dec 17, 2020 - Feb 22, 2021 |
| #15 | -12.41% May 16, 2000 - May 30, 2000 | -8.95% Dec 23, 1999 - Jan 11, 2000 |
Correlation
Correlation between CTAS and MMC is 0.98 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
CTAS vs MMC dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CTAS | MMC |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.44% | 0.00% |
| 2025 | 0.89% | 1.85% |
| 2024 | 0.80% | 1.44% |
| 2023 | 0.83% | 1.37% |
| 2022 | 0.93% | 1.36% |
| 2021 | 0.77% | 1.15% |
| 2020 | 0.99% | 1.57% |
| 2019 | 0.95% | 1.56% |
| 2018 | 1.22% | 1.98% |
| 2017 | 1.04% | 1.76% |
| 2016 | 1.15% | 1.92% |
| 2015 | 1.15% | 2.13% |
| 2014 | 2.17% | 1.85% |
| 2013 | 1.29% | 1.99% |
| 2012 | 1.56% | 2.61% |
| 2011 | 1.55% | 2.72% |
| 2010 | 3.47% | 2.96% |
| 2009 | 1.80% | 3.62% |
| 2008 | 1.98% | 3.30% |
| 2007 | 1.16% | 2.87% |
| 2006 | 0.88% | 2.22% |
| 2005 | 0.78% | 2.14% |
| 2004 | 0.66% | 3.01% |
| 2003 | 0.54% | 3.11% |
| 2002 | 0.55% | 2.36% |
| 2001 | 0.46% | 1.92% |
| 2000 | 0.35% | 1.62% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks