CTAS vs MDLZ
Comparison between Cintas Corporation (CTAS, Company) and Mondelez International Inc - Class A (MDLZ, Company).
CTAS is from the Industrials sector, while MDLZ is from the Consumer Defensive sector.
5-Year PerformanceCTAS has outperformed MDLZ, delivering a return of +16.7% compared to +3.0%
CTAS vs MDLZ - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CTAS vs MDLZ - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CTAS vs MDLZ - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CTAS | MDLZ |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +9.89% | +19.00% |
| 2025 | +4.13% | -6.67% |
| 2024 | +24.46% | -16.92% |
| 2023 | +35.60% | +11.85% |
| 2022 | +7.60% | +3.45% |
| 2021 | +30.13% | +16.99% |
| 2020 | +31.88% | +10.03% |
| 2019 | +62.22% | +40.92% |
| 2018 | +8.31% | -3.39% |
| 2017 | +35.46% | -2.73% |
| 2016 | +32.58% | +2.96% |
| 2015 | +17.39% | +23.80% |
| 2014 | +36.02% | +6.05% |
| 2013 | +43.96% | +34.64% |
| 2012 | +17.86% | +7.06% |
| 2011 | +26.66% | +22.02% |
| 2010 | +9.94% | +19.29% |
| 2009 | +11.53% | +4.02% |
| 2008 | -27.16% | -13.02% |
| 2007 | -16.06% | -5.45% |
| 2006 | -3.44% | +31.08% |
| 2005 | -4.02% | -16.93% |
| 2004 | -11.61% | +13.65% |
| 2003 | +7.44% | -16.00% |
| 2002 | -5.38% | +13.65% |
| 2001 | -4.28% | +9.74% |
| 2000 | +53.86% | N/A |
| 1999 | -12.73% | N/A |
CTAS vs MDLZ Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CTAS was -65.30%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 2829 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for MDLZ was -42.49%, occurring on Mar 5, 2009. Recovery took 2224 trading sessions.
The current CTAS drawdown is -10.36%. The current MDLZ drawdown is -12.18%.
| Rank | CTAS | MDLZ |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -65.30% May 14, 2002 - Aug 8, 2013 | -42.49% Jun 18, 2002 - Apr 15, 2011 |
| #2 | -48.38% Feb 19, 2020 - Jul 29, 2020 | -29.74% Feb 14, 2020 - Oct 13, 2020 |
| #3 | -39.89% Nov 1, 1999 - Apr 4, 2000 | -29.14% May 11, 2023 - Jan 7, 2026 |
| #4 | -36.22% Dec 26, 2000 - May 7, 2002 | -22.29% Oct 22, 2015 - May 15, 2017 |
| #5 | -27.67% Jun 6, 2025 - May 13, 2026 | -18.76% Jun 2, 2017 - Jan 31, 2019 |
| #6 | -27.09% Sep 6, 2018 - Apr 24, 2019 | -18.34% Jan 21, 2022 - Nov 30, 2022 |
| #7 | -23.85% Dec 10, 2021 - Nov 22, 2022 | -16.39% Jul 14, 2014 - Nov 18, 2014 |
| #8 | -23.77% Jun 2, 2000 - Nov 7, 2000 | -12.46% Aug 6, 2015 - Oct 22, 2015 |
| #9 | -19.60% Nov 26, 2024 - May 27, 2025 | -12.05% Nov 28, 2014 - May 7, 2015 |
| #10 | -16.42% Apr 4, 2000 - Apr 25, 2000 | -11.05% Apr 23, 2013 - Aug 2, 2013 |
| #11 | -13.75% Dec 1, 2015 - May 24, 2016 | -10.59% Jan 10, 2014 - Apr 28, 2014 |
| #12 | -13.73% Nov 27, 2000 - Dec 26, 2000 | -10.51% Oct 4, 2012 - Jan 17, 2013 |
| #13 | -13.71% Nov 16, 2020 - Jun 22, 2021 | -10.45% Jul 27, 2021 - Dec 16, 2021 |
| #14 | -12.80% Sep 6, 2016 - Dec 5, 2016 | -9.83% Dec 4, 2020 - Mar 22, 2021 |
| #15 | -12.41% May 16, 2000 - May 30, 2000 | -9.81% Oct 13, 2020 - Dec 4, 2020 |
Correlation
Correlation between CTAS and MDLZ is 0.89 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
CTAS vs MDLZ dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CTAS | MDLZ |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.45% | 1.59% |
| 2025 | 0.89% | 3.60% |
| 2024 | 0.80% | 3.00% |
| 2023 | 0.83% | 2.24% |
| 2022 | 0.93% | 2.21% |
| 2021 | 0.77% | 2.01% |
| 2020 | 0.99% | 2.05% |
| 2019 | 0.95% | 1.98% |
| 2018 | 1.22% | 2.40% |
| 2017 | 1.04% | 1.92% |
| 2016 | 1.15% | 1.62% |
| 2015 | 1.15% | 1.43% |
| 2014 | 2.17% | 1.60% |
| 2013 | 1.29% | 1.53% |
| 2012 | 1.56% | 61.68% |
| 2011 | 1.55% | 3.10% |
| 2010 | 3.47% | 3.68% |
| 2009 | 1.80% | 4.27% |
| 2008 | 1.98% | 4.17% |
| 2007 | 1.16% | 3.19% |
| 2006 | 0.88% | 2.69% |
| 2005 | 0.78% | 3.09% |
| 2004 | 0.66% | 2.16% |
| 2003 | 0.54% | 2.05% |
| 2002 | 0.55% | 1.44% |
| 2001 | 0.46% | 0.76% |
| 2000 | 0.35% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks