CSL vs GFL
Comparison between Carlisle Companies Inc (CSL, Company) and GFL Environmental Inc (Sub Voting) (GFL, Company).
Both CSL and GFL are from the Industrials sector.
5-Year PerformanceCSL has outperformed GFL, delivering a return of +13.1% compared to +4.2%
CSL vs GFL - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CSL vs GFL - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CSL vs GFL - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CSL | GFL |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +5.39% | -9.17% |
| 2025 | -11.66% | -3.62% |
| 2024 | +20.08% | +31.86% |
| 2023 | +35.04% | +17.72% |
| 2022 | -3.01% | -22.46% |
| 2021 | +62.98% | +36.33% |
| 2020 | -3.31% | +73.97% |
| 2019 | +62.36% | N/A |
| 2018 | -12.87% | N/A |
| 2017 | +5.48% | N/A |
| 2016 | +29.32% | N/A |
| 2015 | -0.33% | N/A |
| 2014 | +16.22% | N/A |
| 2013 | +32.88% | N/A |
| 2012 | +30.90% | N/A |
| 2011 | +11.21% | N/A |
| 2010 | +15.36% | N/A |
| 2009 | +64.68% | N/A |
| 2008 | -43.52% | N/A |
| 2007 | -5.44% | N/A |
| 2006 | +13.24% | N/A |
| 2005 | +10.86% | N/A |
| 2004 | +8.11% | N/A |
| 2003 | +44.81% | N/A |
| 2002 | +17.03% | N/A |
| 2001 | -9.48% | N/A |
| 2000 | +26.79% | N/A |
| 1999 | +10.53% | N/A |
CSL vs GFL Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CSL was -64.55%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 918 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for GFL was -42.75%, occurring on Oct 14, 2022. Recovery took 690 trading sessions.
The current CSL drawdown is -27.01%. The current GFL drawdown is -24.44%.
| Rank | CSL | GFL |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -64.55% Sep 4, 2007 - Apr 26, 2011 | -42.75% Nov 18, 2021 - Aug 20, 2024 |
| #2 | -45.55% Jun 29, 2000 - Oct 8, 2003 | -34.88% May 5, 2025 - May 29, 2026 |
| #3 | -39.12% May 10, 2011 - Feb 21, 2012 | -29.41% Mar 4, 2020 - May 13, 2020 |
| #4 | -38.68% Jan 2, 2020 - Mar 25, 2021 | -21.85% Aug 5, 2020 - Oct 13, 2020 |
| #5 | -37.71% Oct 14, 2024 - Nov 20, 2025 | -15.53% Oct 13, 2020 - Nov 11, 2020 |
| #6 | -34.51% Aug 18, 2022 - Dec 15, 2023 | -15.52% Apr 9, 2021 - Sep 8, 2021 |
| #7 | -27.39% Aug 29, 2018 - Apr 18, 2019 | -12.03% Mar 27, 2025 - Apr 14, 2025 |
| #8 | -25.34% Aug 17, 2015 - Apr 27, 2016 | -11.76% Jun 1, 2020 - Jul 23, 2020 |
| #9 | -19.70% May 18, 2005 - Feb 9, 2006 | -11.39% Nov 29, 2024 - Mar 5, 2025 |
| #10 | -19.47% Nov 25, 2016 - Nov 29, 2017 | -10.79% Jan 19, 2021 - Mar 1, 2021 |
| #11 | -17.69% Jan 8, 2018 - Jul 25, 2018 | -9.96% Aug 23, 2024 - Nov 6, 2024 |
| #12 | -15.01% May 4, 2022 - Jul 28, 2022 | -7.07% Nov 2, 2021 - Nov 18, 2021 |
| #13 | -14.86% Jun 10, 2014 - Oct 30, 2014 | -6.13% Dec 9, 2020 - Dec 30, 2020 |
| #14 | -14.45% Jul 16, 2024 - Sep 23, 2024 | -5.76% Mar 3, 2021 - Mar 10, 2021 |
| #15 | -13.99% Jul 16, 2004 - Feb 3, 2005 | -4.73% Dec 31, 2020 - Jan 7, 2021 |
Correlation
Correlation between CSL and GFL is 0.75 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
CSL vs GFL dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CSL | GFL |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.64% | 0.13% |
| 2025 | 1.31% | 0.14% |
| 2024 | 1.00% | 0.12% |
| 2023 | 1.02% | 0.15% |
| 2022 | 1.09% | 0.16% |
| 2021 | 0.86% | 0.11% |
| 2020 | 1.31% | 0.10% |
| 2019 | 1.11% | 0.00% |
| 2018 | 1.53% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 1.27% | 0.00% |
| 2016 | 1.18% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 1.24% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 1.04% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 1.29% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 1.58% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 1.66% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 1.84% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 2.90% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 1.51% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 1.32% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 1.39% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 1.39% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 1.43% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 2.05% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 2.22% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 1.77% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 0.50% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks