StockComparison Logo
vs

CSL vs ARMK

Comparison between Carlisle Companies Inc (CSL, Company) and Aramark (ARMK, Company).

Both CSL and ARMK are from the Industrials sector.

5-Year PerformanceARMK has outperformed CSL, delivering a return of +16.9% compared to +14.0%

CSL vs ARMK - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
CSL
$14B
Winner
ARMK
$14B
Max Drawdown
Winner
CSL
65.48%
ARMK
72.34%
Sharpe Ratio
CSL
-0.17
Winner
ARMK
1.12
5Y Beta
CSL
0.98
Winner
ARMK
0.84
Industry
CSL
Building Products & Equipment
ARMK
Specialty Business Services
P/E Ratio
Winner
CSL
19.60
ARMK
39.28
Forward P/E
Winner
CSL
16.53
ARMK
21.10
PEG Ratio
Winner
CSL
1.10
ARMK
12.57
Dividend Yield
Winner
CSL
1.26%
ARMK
0.87%
5Y Dividends CAGR
Winner
CSL
20.79%
ARMK
14.31%
5Y EPS CAGR
CSL
24.16%
ARMK
N/A
Debt to Equity
CSL
174.73%
Winner
ARMK
0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
CSL
6.63%
ARMK
-0.35%
P/S Ratio
CSL
2.80
Winner
ARMK
0.72
P/B Ratio
CSL
8.44
Winner
ARMK
4.19

CSL vs ARMK - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
CSL
-2.30%
Winner
ARMK
+18.33%
3M
CSL
-7.35%
Winner
ARMK
+30.49%
6M
CSL
+7.56%
Winner
ARMK
+41.54%
1Y
CSL
-7.47%
Winner
ARMK
+35.95%
5Y(CAGR)
CSL
+14.05%
Winner
ARMK
+16.87%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
CSL
+14.55%
ARMK
+9.57%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
CSL
+13.86%
ARMK
+11.23%

CSL vs ARMK - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearCSLARMK
2026+5.99%+46.84%
2025-11.66%+0.81%
2024+20.08%+35.04%
2023+35.04%-4.85%
2022-3.01%+12.60%
2021+62.98%-1.09%
2020-3.31%-10.29%
2019+62.36%+49.41%
2018-12.87%-32.33%
2017+5.48%+24.66%
2016+29.32%+11.66%
2015-0.33%+5.87%
2014+16.22%+24.17%
2013+32.88%+15.51%
2012+30.90%N/A
2011+11.21%N/A
2010+15.36%N/A
2009+64.68%N/A
2008-43.52%N/A
2007-5.44%N/A
2006+13.24%N/A
2005+10.86%N/A
2004+8.11%N/A
2003+44.81%N/A
2002+17.03%N/A
2001-9.48%N/A
2000+26.79%N/A
1999+10.53%N/A

CSL vs ARMK Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CSL was -64.55%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 918 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for ARMK was -72.27%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 751 trading sessions.

The current CSL drawdown is -26.59%. The current ARMK drawdown is -1.77%.

RankCSLARMK
#1-64.55%
Sep 4, 2007 - Apr 26, 2011
-72.27%
Jan 22, 2020 - Jan 13, 2023
#2-45.55%
Jun 29, 2000 - Oct 8, 2003
-39.55%
Jan 26, 2018 - Nov 19, 2019
#3-39.12%
May 10, 2011 - Feb 21, 2012
-27.63%
Nov 26, 2024 - Jun 26, 2025
#4-38.68%
Jan 2, 2020 - Mar 25, 2021
-26.25%
Jan 17, 2023 - Mar 12, 2024
#5-37.71%
Oct 14, 2024 - Nov 20, 2025
-18.15%
Jul 23, 2025 - Apr 14, 2026
#6-34.51%
Aug 18, 2022 - Dec 15, 2023
-14.85%
Mar 21, 2014 - Nov 28, 2014
#7-27.39%
Aug 29, 2018 - Apr 18, 2019
-13.97%
Aug 19, 2015 - Dec 2, 2015
#8-25.34%
Aug 17, 2015 - Apr 27, 2016
-13.24%
Sep 7, 2016 - Jun 1, 2017
#9-19.70%
May 18, 2005 - Feb 9, 2006
-12.37%
Dec 4, 2015 - Apr 18, 2016
#10-19.47%
Nov 25, 2016 - Nov 29, 2017
-9.84%
Dec 31, 2013 - Feb 10, 2014
#11-17.69%
Jan 8, 2018 - Jul 25, 2018
-8.96%
Nov 3, 2017 - Jan 10, 2018
#12-15.01%
May 4, 2022 - Jul 28, 2022
-7.60%
May 10, 2016 - Jul 8, 2016
#13-14.86%
Jun 10, 2014 - Oct 30, 2014
-7.51%
May 14, 2024 - Jun 10, 2024
#14-14.45%
Jul 16, 2024 - Sep 23, 2024
-7.37%
Mar 10, 2014 - Mar 21, 2014
#15-13.99%
Jul 16, 2004 - Feb 3, 2005
-6.94%
Nov 28, 2014 - Dec 23, 2014

Correlation

Correlation between CSL and ARMK is 0.79 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.79
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

CSL vs ARMK dividend yield comparison.

YearCSLARMK
20260.64%0.45%
20251.31%1.18%
20241.00%1.05%
20231.02%1.19%
20221.09%1.06%
20210.86%1.19%
20201.31%1.14%
20191.11%1.01%
20181.53%1.47%
20171.27%0.97%
20161.18%1.09%
20151.24%1.10%
20141.04%1.00%
20131.06%0.00%
20121.29%0.00%
20111.58%0.00%
20101.66%0.00%
20091.84%0.00%
20082.90%0.00%
20071.51%0.00%
20061.32%0.00%
20051.39%0.00%
20041.39%0.00%
20031.43%0.00%
20022.05%0.00%
20012.22%0.00%
20001.77%0.00%
19990.50%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare