CSL vs ARMK
Comparison between Carlisle Companies Inc (CSL, Company) and Aramark (ARMK, Company).
Both CSL and ARMK are from the Industrials sector.
5-Year PerformanceARMK has outperformed CSL, delivering a return of +16.9% compared to +14.0%
CSL vs ARMK - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CSL vs ARMK - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CSL vs ARMK - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CSL | ARMK |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +5.99% | +46.84% |
| 2025 | -11.66% | +0.81% |
| 2024 | +20.08% | +35.04% |
| 2023 | +35.04% | -4.85% |
| 2022 | -3.01% | +12.60% |
| 2021 | +62.98% | -1.09% |
| 2020 | -3.31% | -10.29% |
| 2019 | +62.36% | +49.41% |
| 2018 | -12.87% | -32.33% |
| 2017 | +5.48% | +24.66% |
| 2016 | +29.32% | +11.66% |
| 2015 | -0.33% | +5.87% |
| 2014 | +16.22% | +24.17% |
| 2013 | +32.88% | +15.51% |
| 2012 | +30.90% | N/A |
| 2011 | +11.21% | N/A |
| 2010 | +15.36% | N/A |
| 2009 | +64.68% | N/A |
| 2008 | -43.52% | N/A |
| 2007 | -5.44% | N/A |
| 2006 | +13.24% | N/A |
| 2005 | +10.86% | N/A |
| 2004 | +8.11% | N/A |
| 2003 | +44.81% | N/A |
| 2002 | +17.03% | N/A |
| 2001 | -9.48% | N/A |
| 2000 | +26.79% | N/A |
| 1999 | +10.53% | N/A |
CSL vs ARMK Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CSL was -64.55%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 918 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for ARMK was -72.27%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 751 trading sessions.
The current CSL drawdown is -26.59%. The current ARMK drawdown is -1.77%.
| Rank | CSL | ARMK |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -64.55% Sep 4, 2007 - Apr 26, 2011 | -72.27% Jan 22, 2020 - Jan 13, 2023 |
| #2 | -45.55% Jun 29, 2000 - Oct 8, 2003 | -39.55% Jan 26, 2018 - Nov 19, 2019 |
| #3 | -39.12% May 10, 2011 - Feb 21, 2012 | -27.63% Nov 26, 2024 - Jun 26, 2025 |
| #4 | -38.68% Jan 2, 2020 - Mar 25, 2021 | -26.25% Jan 17, 2023 - Mar 12, 2024 |
| #5 | -37.71% Oct 14, 2024 - Nov 20, 2025 | -18.15% Jul 23, 2025 - Apr 14, 2026 |
| #6 | -34.51% Aug 18, 2022 - Dec 15, 2023 | -14.85% Mar 21, 2014 - Nov 28, 2014 |
| #7 | -27.39% Aug 29, 2018 - Apr 18, 2019 | -13.97% Aug 19, 2015 - Dec 2, 2015 |
| #8 | -25.34% Aug 17, 2015 - Apr 27, 2016 | -13.24% Sep 7, 2016 - Jun 1, 2017 |
| #9 | -19.70% May 18, 2005 - Feb 9, 2006 | -12.37% Dec 4, 2015 - Apr 18, 2016 |
| #10 | -19.47% Nov 25, 2016 - Nov 29, 2017 | -9.84% Dec 31, 2013 - Feb 10, 2014 |
| #11 | -17.69% Jan 8, 2018 - Jul 25, 2018 | -8.96% Nov 3, 2017 - Jan 10, 2018 |
| #12 | -15.01% May 4, 2022 - Jul 28, 2022 | -7.60% May 10, 2016 - Jul 8, 2016 |
| #13 | -14.86% Jun 10, 2014 - Oct 30, 2014 | -7.51% May 14, 2024 - Jun 10, 2024 |
| #14 | -14.45% Jul 16, 2024 - Sep 23, 2024 | -7.37% Mar 10, 2014 - Mar 21, 2014 |
| #15 | -13.99% Jul 16, 2004 - Feb 3, 2005 | -6.94% Nov 28, 2014 - Dec 23, 2014 |
Correlation
Correlation between CSL and ARMK is 0.79 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
CSL vs ARMK dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CSL | ARMK |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.64% | 0.45% |
| 2025 | 1.31% | 1.18% |
| 2024 | 1.00% | 1.05% |
| 2023 | 1.02% | 1.19% |
| 2022 | 1.09% | 1.06% |
| 2021 | 0.86% | 1.19% |
| 2020 | 1.31% | 1.14% |
| 2019 | 1.11% | 1.01% |
| 2018 | 1.53% | 1.47% |
| 2017 | 1.27% | 0.97% |
| 2016 | 1.18% | 1.09% |
| 2015 | 1.24% | 1.10% |
| 2014 | 1.04% | 1.00% |
| 2013 | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 1.29% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 1.58% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 1.66% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 1.84% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 2.90% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 1.51% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 1.32% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 1.39% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 1.39% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 1.43% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 2.05% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 2.22% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 1.77% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 0.50% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks