CRS vs ALB
Comparison between Carpenter Technology Corp (CRS, Company) and Albemarle Corp (ALB, Company).
CRS is from the Industrials sector, while ALB is from the Basic Materials sector.
5-Year PerformanceCRS has outperformed ALB, delivering a return of +61.6% compared to +5.8%
CRS vs ALB - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CRS vs ALB - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CRS vs ALB - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CRS | ALB |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +26.63% | +41.81% |
| 2025 | +80.07% | +69.37% |
| 2024 | +146.71% | -40.46% |
| 2023 | +100.26% | -32.07% |
| 2022 | +24.98% | -7.76% |
| 2021 | +6.41% | +54.41% |
| 2020 | -39.06% | +106.78% |
| 2019 | +35.16% | -4.60% |
| 2018 | -31.93% | -40.58% |
| 2017 | +41.89% | +46.84% |
| 2016 | +25.93% | +57.51% |
| 2015 | -35.61% | -4.95% |
| 2014 | -19.41% | -3.13% |
| 2013 | +18.16% | +0.06% |
| 2012 | -1.33% | +19.42% |
| 2011 | +25.15% | -6.62% |
| 2010 | +46.05% | +48.29% |
| 2009 | +27.41% | +60.40% |
| 2008 | -71.91% | -44.46% |
| 2007 | +51.27% | +15.81% |
| 2006 | +43.41% | +77.63% |
| 2005 | +27.69% | +2.50% |
| 2004 | +93.51% | +30.33% |
| 2003 | +139.02% | +7.05% |
| 2002 | -49.63% | +21.26% |
| 2001 | -14.70% | +5.14% |
| 2000 | +36.39% | +40.63% |
| 1999 | +14.08% | +0.87% |
CRS vs ALB Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CRS was -84.68%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 3923 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for ALB was -83.90%, occurring on Apr 8, 2025. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current CRS drawdown is -6.59%. The current ALB drawdown is -34.29%.
| Rank | CRS | ALB |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -84.68% Dec 10, 2007 - Jul 13, 2023 | -83.90% Nov 11, 2022 - Apr 8, 2025 |
| #2 | -72.07% Dec 8, 2000 - Feb 11, 2004 | -66.29% Oct 31, 2007 - Apr 29, 2010 |
| #3 | -35.12% May 10, 2006 - Jul 12, 2007 | -63.27% Nov 8, 2017 - Nov 27, 2020 |
| #4 | -31.09% Jan 6, 2000 - Jul 27, 2000 | -44.82% May 10, 2011 - Nov 27, 2013 |
| #5 | -30.24% Jul 19, 2007 - Nov 29, 2007 | -41.04% Jul 14, 2014 - May 11, 2016 |
| #6 | -28.74% Jan 23, 2025 - May 2, 2025 | -39.26% Nov 22, 2021 - Aug 15, 2022 |
| #7 | -26.94% Mar 4, 2005 - Dec 12, 2005 | -30.91% Jun 10, 2002 - Jun 29, 2004 |
| #8 | -25.89% Oct 6, 2004 - Nov 9, 2004 | -30.70% Dec 28, 2000 - Mar 4, 2002 |
| #9 | -25.65% Feb 12, 2004 - Jul 26, 2004 | -26.73% Aug 16, 2000 - Dec 28, 2000 |
| #10 | -19.89% Dec 4, 2023 - Apr 4, 2024 | -24.92% Nov 15, 1999 - Mar 20, 2000 |
| #11 | -19.45% Aug 29, 2000 - Nov 7, 2000 | -24.05% Jan 19, 2021 - Jul 12, 2021 |
| #12 | -19.08% Jul 18, 2025 - Oct 23, 2025 | -22.55% Sep 14, 2022 - Nov 10, 2022 |
| #13 | -16.92% Dec 21, 2004 - Feb 3, 2005 | -20.14% Apr 23, 2007 - Sep 26, 2007 |
| #14 | -15.74% Nov 26, 2024 - Jan 15, 2025 | -18.86% Dec 1, 2004 - Jan 3, 2006 |
| #15 | -14.08% Jan 31, 2006 - Mar 15, 2006 | -15.62% Apr 29, 2010 - Sep 30, 2010 |
Correlation
Correlation between CRS and ALB is 0.35 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
CRS vs ALB dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CRS | ALB |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.09% | 0.20% |
| 2025 | 0.25% | 1.15% |
| 2024 | 0.47% | 1.87% |
| 2023 | 1.13% | 1.11% |
| 2022 | 2.17% | 0.73% |
| 2021 | 2.74% | 0.67% |
| 2020 | 2.75% | 1.04% |
| 2019 | 1.61% | 2.01% |
| 2018 | 2.13% | 1.74% |
| 2017 | 1.41% | 1.00% |
| 2016 | 1.99% | 1.42% |
| 2015 | 2.38% | 2.07% |
| 2014 | 1.46% | 1.83% |
| 2013 | 1.16% | 1.51% |
| 2012 | 1.39% | 1.29% |
| 2011 | 1.40% | 1.30% |
| 2010 | 1.79% | 1.00% |
| 2009 | 2.67% | 1.37% |
| 2008 | 3.36% | 2.15% |
| 2007 | 0.75% | 1.02% |
| 2006 | 0.73% | 0.96% |
| 2005 | 0.74% | 1.62% |
| 2004 | 0.59% | 1.51% |
| 2003 | 1.12% | 1.89% |
| 2002 | 8.62% | 1.90% |
| 2001 | 4.96% | 2.17% |
| 2000 | 3.77% | 1.86% |
| 1999 | 1.20% | 0.52% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks