CRDF vs LGO

Comparison between Cardiff Oncology Inc (CRDF, Company) and Largo Inc (LGO, Company).

CRDF is from the Healthcare sector, while LGO is from the Basic Materials sector.

5-Year PerformanceCRDF has outperformed LGO, delivering a return of -30.9% compared to -47.2%

CRDF vs LGO - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	CRDF(COMPANY)	LGO(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$59M	$59M
Max Drawdown	99.96%	99.29%
Sharpe Ratio	-1.24	-0.59
5Y Beta	1.52	1.71
Industry	Biotechnology	Other Industrial Metals & Mining
P/E Ratio	-1.30	-0.70
Forward P/E	N/A	7.83
PEG Ratio	N/A	-0.02
5Y EPS CAGR	-0.54%	N/A
Debt to Equity	0.00%	73.31%
Free Cash Flow Yield	-63.71%	-74.60%
P/S Ratio	124.47	0.60
P/B Ratio	1.88	0.44

Market Cap

Winner

CRDF

$59M

LGO

$59M

Max Drawdown

CRDF

99.96%

Winner

LGO

99.29%

Sharpe Ratio

CRDF

-1.24

Winner

LGO

-0.59

5Y Beta

Winner

CRDF

1.52

LGO

1.71

Industry

CRDF

Biotechnology

LGO

Other Industrial Metals & Mining

P/E Ratio

Winner

CRDF

-1.30

LGO

-0.70

Forward P/E

CRDF

N/A

LGO

7.83

PEG Ratio

CRDF

N/A

LGO

-0.02

5Y EPS CAGR

CRDF

-0.54%

LGO

N/A

Debt to Equity

Winner

CRDF

0.00%

LGO

73.31%

Free Cash Flow Yield

Winner

CRDF

-63.71%

LGO

-74.60%

P/S Ratio

CRDF

124.47

Winner

LGO

0.60

P/B Ratio

CRDF

1.88

Winner

LGO

0.44

CRDF vs LGO - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	CRDF	LGO
1 month	-32.95%	-10.17%
3 months	-49.81%	-49.34%
6 months	-71.10%	-55.41%
1 year	-80.46%	-60.43%
5 years(CAGR)	-30.88%	-47.18%
10 years(CAGR)	-45.50%	-17.71%
Max(CAGR)	-29.12%	-22.56%

CRDF

-32.95%

Winner

LGO

-10.17%

CRDF

-49.81%

Winner

LGO

-49.34%

CRDF

-71.10%

Winner

LGO

-55.41%

CRDF

-80.46%

Winner

LGO

-60.43%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

CRDF

-30.88%

LGO

-47.18%

10Y(CAGR)

CRDF

-45.50%

Winner

LGO

-17.71%

Max(CAGR)

CRDF

-29.12%

Winner

LGO

-22.56%

CRDF vs LGO - Annual Returns (2004 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	CRDF	LGO
2026	-68.49%	-39.70%
2025	-34.04%	-47.35%
2024	+183.66%	-23.89%
2023	+0.00%	-57.46%
2022	-78.23%	-40.62%
2021	-65.91%	-19.26%
2020	+1339.20%	+41.64%
2019	-64.37%	-63.97%
2018	-85.64%	+83.14%
2017	-85.00%	+205.71%
2016	-59.46%	+59.63%
2015	+10.20%	-83.45%
2014	-26.37%	-27.50%
2013	-17.17%	+8.11%
2012	+110.00%	-35.80%
2011	+14.58%	-32.35%
2010	-31.59%	+123.55%
2009	+130.77%	+254.77%
2008	-51.49%	-91.02%
2007	-33.00%	-38.74%
2006	-41.40%	N/A
2005	-54.00%	N/A
2004	+6.67%	N/A

CRDF vs LGO Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CRDF was -99.96%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for LGO was -99.29%, occurring on Jul 20, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current CRDF drawdown is -99.96%. The current LGO drawdown is -99.25%.

Rank	CRDF	LGO
#1	-99.96% Jun 8, 2005 - Mar 18, 2020	-99.29% Jul 17, 2007 - Jul 20, 2026
#2	-42.53% Nov 23, 2004 - Jun 8, 2005	-1.74% Jul 13, 2007 - Jul 17, 2007
#3	-5.88% Nov 12, 2004 - Nov 23, 2004	N/A
#4	-1.32% Aug 11, 2004 - Nov 2, 2004	N/A