CRD-A vs THM
Comparison between Crawford & Co. - Class A (CRD-A, Company) and International Tower Hill Mines Ltd (THM, Company).
CRD-A is from the Financial Services sector, while THM is from the Basic Materials sector.
5-Year PerformanceTHM has outperformed CRD-A, delivering a return of +16.7% compared to +7.0%
CRD-A vs THM - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CRD-A vs THM - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CRD-A vs THM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CRD-A | THM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +1.34% | +16.93% |
| 2025 | +1.73% | +294.90% |
| 2024 | -7.92% | -26.55% |
| 2023 | +147.47% | +32.77% |
| 2022 | -25.48% | -43.67% |
| 2021 | +8.09% | -50.02% |
| 2020 | -32.56% | +155.56% |
| 2019 | +34.22% | +3.85% |
| 2018 | +7.57% | +12.93% |
| 2017 | -6.49% | -26.87% |
| 2016 | +97.00% | +188.05% |
| 2015 | -38.28% | -52.53% |
| 2014 | +15.94% | -0.88% |
| 2013 | +36.90% | -82.55% |
| 2012 | +49.04% | -52.31% |
| 2011 | +70.23% | -56.36% |
| 2010 | -24.53% | +45.29% |
| 2009 | -56.34% | +433.12% |
| 2008 | +86.70% | -30.81% |
| 2007 | -42.62% | -25.06% |
| 2006 | +4.59% | N/A |
| 2005 | -10.39% | N/A |
| 2004 | +3.60% | N/A |
| 2003 | +76.03% | N/A |
| 2002 | -49.92% | N/A |
| 2001 | -9.05% | N/A |
| 2000 | -3.54% | N/A |
| 1999 | +0.09% | N/A |
CRD-A vs THM Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CRD-A was -82.82%, occurring on Sep 27, 2010. Recovery took 1997 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for THM was -98.18%, occurring on Jan 4, 2016. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current CRD-A drawdown is -13.34%. The current THM drawdown is -78.71%.
| Rank | CRD-A | THM |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -82.82% Aug 11, 2008 - Jul 18, 2016 | -98.18% Apr 5, 2011 - Jan 4, 2016 |
| #2 | -70.16% Mar 18, 2002 - Aug 11, 2008 | -70.40% Jul 20, 2007 - May 6, 2009 |
| #3 | -52.67% Dec 16, 2019 - Jun 16, 2023 | -29.56% Jun 11, 2009 - Sep 3, 2009 |
| #4 | -40.76% Feb 26, 2024 - Mar 11, 2024 | -28.17% Jan 8, 2010 - Nov 2, 2010 |
| #5 | -32.87% Nov 21, 2016 - Feb 1, 2019 | -19.48% Oct 14, 2009 - Nov 6, 2009 |
| #6 | -30.76% Jun 29, 2001 - Mar 18, 2002 | -18.59% Dec 21, 2010 - Apr 5, 2011 |
| #7 | -20.81% Mar 5, 2019 - Jun 27, 2019 | -15.16% May 8, 2009 - May 29, 2009 |
| #8 | -19.53% Jun 30, 2023 - Nov 20, 2023 | -13.00% Sep 16, 2009 - Oct 6, 2009 |
| #9 | -17.94% Jan 11, 2000 - Jun 20, 2001 | -11.56% Dec 2, 2009 - Jan 6, 2010 |
| #10 | -12.24% Jul 18, 2016 - Nov 11, 2016 | -9.19% Nov 4, 2010 - Nov 29, 2010 |
| #11 | -11.15% Dec 29, 2023 - Feb 15, 2024 | -8.71% May 29, 2009 - Jun 11, 2009 |
| #12 | -9.95% Jul 15, 2019 - Sep 12, 2019 | -7.59% Jun 8, 2007 - Jul 20, 2007 |
| #13 | -8.21% Feb 19, 2019 - Mar 1, 2019 | -7.36% Dec 1, 2010 - Dec 13, 2010 |
| #14 | -5.83% Nov 2, 1999 - Dec 22, 1999 | -6.57% May 22, 2007 - Jun 7, 2007 |
| #15 | -5.70% Sep 30, 2019 - Nov 13, 2019 | -5.48% Nov 11, 2009 - Nov 13, 2009 |
Correlation
Correlation between CRD-A and THM is -0.57 which considered as a moderate negative correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move in opposite directions.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
CRD-A vs THM dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CRD-A | THM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.38% | 0.00% |
| 2025 | 2.58% | 0.00% |
| 2024 | 2.42% | 0.00% |
| 2023 | 1.97% | 0.00% |
| 2022 | 4.32% | 0.00% |
| 2021 | 3.20% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 2.57% | 0.00% |
| 2019 | 2.44% | 0.00% |
| 2018 | 3.15% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 3.29% | 0.00% |
| 2016 | 2.96% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 5.52% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 2.80% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 2.34% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 2.84% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 2.46% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 3.03% |
| 2006 | 3.01% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 4.14% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 3.43% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 3.39% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 9.76% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 6.41% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 5.42% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 1.14% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks