CRD-A vs GSM
Comparison between Crawford & Co. - Class A (CRD-A, Company) and Ferroglobe Plc (GSM, Company).
CRD-A is from the Financial Services sector, while GSM is from the Basic Materials sector.
5-Year PerformanceCRD-A has outperformed GSM, delivering a return of +3.6% compared to -11.3%
CRD-A vs GSM - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CRD-A vs GSM - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CRD-A vs GSM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CRD-A | GSM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +1.86% | -29.51% |
| 2025 | +1.73% | +19.65% |
| 2024 | -7.92% | -40.94% |
| 2023 | +147.47% | +77.87% |
| 2022 | -25.48% | -40.03% |
| 2021 | +8.09% | +293.04% |
| 2020 | -32.56% | +72.63% |
| 2019 | +34.22% | -43.37% |
| 2018 | +7.57% | -90.18% |
| 2017 | -6.49% | +75.14% |
| 2016 | +97.00% | -0.34% |
| 2015 | -38.28% | -36.58% |
| 2014 | +15.94% | -2.66% |
| 2013 | +36.90% | +26.97% |
| 2012 | +49.04% | -1.77% |
| 2011 | +70.23% | -21.54% |
| 2010 | -24.53% | +78.81% |
| 2009 | -56.34% | +32.58% |
| 2008 | +86.70% | N/A |
| 2007 | -42.62% | N/A |
| 2006 | +4.59% | N/A |
| 2005 | -10.39% | N/A |
| 2004 | +3.60% | N/A |
| 2003 | +76.03% | N/A |
| 2002 | -49.92% | N/A |
| 2001 | -9.05% | N/A |
| 2000 | -3.54% | N/A |
| 1999 | +0.09% | N/A |
CRD-A vs GSM Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CRD-A was -82.82%, occurring on Sep 27, 2010. Recovery took 1997 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for GSM was -98.30%, occurring on Mar 16, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current CRD-A drawdown is -12.90%. The current GSM drawdown is -84.74%.
| Rank | CRD-A | GSM |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -82.82% Aug 11, 2008 - Jul 18, 2016 | -98.30% Jul 13, 2011 - Mar 16, 2020 |
| #2 | -70.16% Mar 18, 2002 - Aug 11, 2008 | -23.08% Apr 29, 2010 - Sep 17, 2010 |
| #3 | -52.67% Dec 16, 2019 - Jun 16, 2023 | -16.94% Apr 5, 2011 - Jul 7, 2011 |
| #4 | -40.76% Feb 26, 2024 - Mar 11, 2024 | -15.74% Sep 30, 2009 - Nov 12, 2009 |
| #5 | -32.87% Nov 21, 2016 - Feb 1, 2019 | -13.43% Jan 20, 2010 - Mar 8, 2010 |
| #6 | -30.76% Jun 29, 2001 - Mar 18, 2002 | -12.73% Mar 4, 2011 - Apr 5, 2011 |
| #7 | -20.81% Mar 5, 2019 - Jun 27, 2019 | -12.42% Aug 5, 2009 - Sep 30, 2009 |
| #8 | -19.53% Jun 30, 2023 - Nov 20, 2023 | -10.07% Nov 12, 2009 - Dec 8, 2009 |
| #9 | -17.94% Jan 11, 2000 - Jun 20, 2001 | -8.70% Feb 17, 2011 - Feb 28, 2011 |
| #10 | -12.24% Jul 18, 2016 - Nov 11, 2016 | -8.58% Jan 18, 2011 - Feb 8, 2011 |
| #11 | -11.15% Dec 29, 2023 - Feb 15, 2024 | -6.84% Nov 8, 2010 - Dec 3, 2010 |
| #12 | -9.95% Jul 15, 2019 - Sep 12, 2019 | -5.97% Dec 10, 2010 - Jan 7, 2011 |
| #13 | -8.21% Feb 19, 2019 - Mar 1, 2019 | -5.74% Oct 18, 2010 - Nov 2, 2010 |
| #14 | -5.83% Nov 2, 1999 - Dec 22, 1999 | -4.24% Apr 26, 2010 - Apr 29, 2010 |
| #15 | -5.70% Sep 30, 2019 - Nov 13, 2019 | -4.21% Dec 9, 2009 - Dec 23, 2009 |
Correlation
Correlation between CRD-A and GSM is -0.55 which considered as a moderate negative correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move in opposite directions.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
CRD-A vs GSM dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CRD-A | GSM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.37% | 0.93% |
| 2025 | 2.58% | 1.21% |
| 2024 | 2.42% | 1.37% |
| 2023 | 1.97% | 0.00% |
| 2022 | 4.32% | 0.00% |
| 2021 | 3.20% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 2.57% | 0.00% |
| 2019 | 2.44% | 0.00% |
| 2018 | 3.15% | 7.55% |
| 2017 | 3.29% | 0.00% |
| 2016 | 2.96% | 2.95% |
| 2015 | 5.52% | 2.98% |
| 2014 | 2.80% | 1.74% |
| 2013 | 2.34% | 1.46% |
| 2012 | 2.84% | 1.82% |
| 2011 | 2.46% | 1.49% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 0.88% |
| 2006 | 3.01% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 4.14% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 3.43% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 3.39% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 9.76% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 6.41% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 5.42% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 1.14% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks