CQP vs ATO
Comparison between Cheniere Energy Partners LP (CQP, Company) and Atmos Energy Corp (ATO, Company).
CQP is from the Energy sector, while ATO is from the Utilities sector.
5-Year PerformanceCQP has outperformed ATO, delivering a return of +15.4% compared to +14.7%
CQP vs ATO - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CQP vs ATO - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CQP vs ATO - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CQP | ATO |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +16.48% | +7.41% |
| 2025 | +1.85% | +23.95% |
| 2024 | +9.37% | +22.26% |
| 2023 | -1.11% | +6.99% |
| 2022 | +44.85% | +9.35% |
| 2021 | +29.47% | +14.42% |
| 2020 | -4.20% | -11.55% |
| 2019 | +17.88% | +27.08% |
| 2018 | +29.23% | +11.48% |
| 2017 | +7.48% | +17.77% |
| 2016 | +19.44% | +21.72% |
| 2015 | -15.36% | +16.00% |
| 2014 | +19.27% | +28.60% |
| 2013 | +41.07% | +31.33% |
| 2012 | +26.60% | +10.40% |
| 2011 | -8.85% | +10.26% |
| 2010 | +74.14% | +10.83% |
| 2009 | +242.49% | +28.15% |
| 2008 | -73.00% | -10.92% |
| 2007 | -22.58% | -9.17% |
| 2006 | N/A | +24.81% |
| 2005 | N/A | +2.83% |
| 2004 | N/A | +16.09% |
| 2003 | N/A | +8.60% |
| 2002 | N/A | +14.61% |
| 2001 | N/A | -11.18% |
| 2000 | N/A | +28.93% |
| 1999 | N/A | -10.02% |
CQP vs ATO Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CQP was -78.51%, occurring on Dec 31, 2008. Recovery took 686 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for ATO was -34.51%, occurring on Apr 24, 2000. Recovery took 195 trading sessions.
The current CQP drawdown is -11.62%. The current ATO drawdown is -5.91%.
| Rank | CQP | ATO |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -78.51% Apr 17, 2007 - Jan 5, 2010 | -34.51% Nov 4, 1999 - Aug 14, 2000 |
| #2 | -60.29% Sep 16, 2019 - Mar 11, 2021 | -32.91% Feb 18, 2020 - Mar 4, 2022 |
| #3 | -46.98% Jan 13, 2011 - Feb 27, 2012 | -32.75% May 22, 2007 - Oct 19, 2009 |
| #4 | -37.91% Jun 23, 2015 - Jan 26, 2017 | -24.38% Dec 27, 2000 - Jan 6, 2003 |
| #5 | -31.58% Apr 27, 2012 - Mar 22, 2013 | -19.08% Apr 20, 2022 - Jul 12, 2023 |
| #6 | -29.08% Nov 30, 2022 - Nov 2, 2023 | -16.88% Jul 26, 2023 - Jul 16, 2024 |
| #7 | -27.92% May 4, 2022 - Aug 25, 2022 | -16.62% Mar 8, 2011 - Sep 8, 2011 |
| #8 | -24.86% Nov 30, 2023 - Dec 2, 2024 | -15.86% Aug 17, 2000 - Oct 31, 2000 |
| #9 | -24.25% Apr 23, 2010 - Jul 20, 2010 | -15.45% Nov 30, 2017 - Jul 3, 2018 |
| #10 | -23.60% Apr 1, 2025 - Mar 5, 2026 | -14.73% Jun 30, 2016 - Mar 15, 2017 |
| #11 | -19.63% May 30, 2014 - Apr 30, 2015 | -14.07% Nov 29, 2000 - Dec 27, 2000 |
| #12 | -19.24% Mar 4, 2022 - May 4, 2022 | -14.00% May 20, 2013 - Aug 1, 2013 |
| #13 | -19.17% May 31, 2013 - Jul 23, 2013 | -12.84% Aug 31, 2005 - Jul 11, 2006 |
| #14 | -17.85% May 25, 2017 - May 4, 2018 | -12.44% Jan 6, 2003 - May 23, 2003 |
| #15 | -17.49% Sep 27, 2018 - Jan 17, 2019 | -12.07% Aug 1, 2013 - Nov 8, 2013 |
Correlation
Correlation between CQP and ATO is 0.96 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
CQP vs ATO dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CQP | ATO |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.34% | 0.55% |
| 2025 | 6.15% | 2.15% |
| 2024 | 5.06% | 2.36% |
| 2023 | 8.36% | 2.61% |
| 2022 | 6.82% | 2.48% |
| 2021 | 6.30% | 2.44% |
| 2020 | 7.28% | 2.46% |
| 2019 | 6.08% | 1.92% |
| 2018 | 6.07% | 2.14% |
| 2017 | 5.79% | 2.14% |
| 2016 | 5.90% | 2.31% |
| 2015 | 6.52% | 2.52% |
| 2014 | 5.31% | 2.69% |
| 2013 | 5.93% | 3.13% |
| 2012 | 8.00% | 3.94% |
| 2011 | 9.43% | 4.09% |
| 2010 | 7.98% | 4.31% |
| 2009 | 13.17% | 4.51% |
| 2008 | 45.82% | 5.51% |
| 2007 | 5.47% | 4.58% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 3.96% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 4.76% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 4.48% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 4.96% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 5.08% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 5.48% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 4.63% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 1.37% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks