CPK vs SLG
Comparison between Chesapeake Utilities Corp (CPK, Company) and SL Green Realty Corp (SLG, Company).
CPK is from the Utilities sector, while SLG is from the Real Estate sector.
5-Year PerformanceCPK has outperformed SLG, delivering a return of +3.7% compared to -5.3%
CPK vs SLG - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CPK vs SLG - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CPK vs SLG - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CPK | SLG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +2.67% | -4.52% |
| 2025 | +6.45% | -29.51% |
| 2024 | +17.28% | +55.60% |
| 2023 | -8.01% | +46.72% |
| 2022 | -15.76% | -53.10% |
| 2021 | +40.10% | +27.82% |
| 2020 | +16.81% | -26.79% |
| 2019 | +22.46% | +22.95% |
| 2018 | +6.91% | -18.59% |
| 2017 | +21.25% | -4.14% |
| 2016 | +26.61% | +0.52% |
| 2015 | +16.32% | -4.81% |
| 2014 | -14.98% | +31.93% |
| 2013 | +32.04% | +19.77% |
| 2012 | +7.91% | +14.04% |
| 2011 | +7.95% | -2.84% |
| 2010 | +34.61% | +38.88% |
| 2009 | +7.70% | +110.07% |
| 2008 | +6.51% | -70.73% |
| 2007 | +8.36% | -28.17% |
| 2006 | +3.76% | +74.74% |
| 2005 | +20.23% | +32.31% |
| 2004 | +7.15% | +53.15% |
| 2003 | +47.76% | +36.32% |
| 2002 | -2.27% | +9.71% |
| 2001 | +12.24% | +15.82% |
| 2000 | +7.36% | +37.10% |
| 1999 | +5.71% | +17.56% |
CPK vs SLG Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CPK was -44.55%, occurring on Sep 25, 2014. Recovery took 623 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for SLG was -94.03%, occurring on Mar 6, 2009. Recovery took 2043 trading sessions.
The current CPK drawdown is -7.73%. The current SLG drawdown is -44.28%.
| Rank | CPK | SLG |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -44.55% Jul 1, 2014 - Dec 19, 2016 | -94.03% Feb 7, 2007 - Mar 20, 2015 |
| #2 | -38.67% Dec 31, 2021 - Oct 3, 2025 | -79.45% Mar 20, 2015 - Mar 23, 2023 |
| #3 | -34.04% Jul 12, 2007 - Jun 29, 2009 | -22.23% Jun 25, 2002 - May 22, 2003 |
| #4 | -27.61% Feb 13, 2020 - Nov 2, 2020 | -16.51% Apr 2, 2004 - Jul 2, 2004 |
| #5 | -21.78% Nov 30, 2017 - Jul 5, 2018 | -15.30% Jul 28, 2000 - May 22, 2001 |
| #6 | -21.38% Dec 29, 2003 - Nov 11, 2004 | -12.96% Dec 31, 2004 - Apr 29, 2005 |
| #7 | -19.47% Oct 5, 2005 - Jul 18, 2006 | -9.09% Mar 1, 2000 - Mar 23, 2000 |
| #8 | -18.35% Jun 7, 2002 - May 7, 2003 | -8.24% Nov 21, 2006 - Jan 16, 2007 |
| #9 | -16.06% Aug 4, 2009 - Jul 27, 2010 | -8.24% Aug 2, 2005 - Nov 10, 2005 |
| #10 | -15.60% Jul 18, 2006 - May 16, 2007 | -8.15% May 5, 2000 - Jun 20, 2000 |
| #11 | -15.22% Dec 14, 2018 - Mar 11, 2019 | -7.75% Jul 8, 2003 - Oct 1, 2003 |
| #12 | -14.67% Apr 15, 2005 - May 10, 2005 | -7.59% Aug 15, 2001 - Sep 27, 2001 |
| #13 | -14.34% Aug 1, 2013 - Dec 19, 2013 | -7.53% Mar 29, 2006 - May 10, 2006 |
| #14 | -14.30% Oct 17, 2012 - Mar 1, 2013 | -6.79% Oct 20, 2003 - Dec 11, 2003 |
| #15 | -14.12% Dec 8, 1999 - Nov 30, 2000 | -6.31% Sep 28, 2001 - Jan 14, 2002 |
Correlation
Correlation between CPK and SLG is 0.44 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
CPK vs SLG dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CPK | SLG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.54% | 1.40% |
| 2025 | 2.16% | 6.18% |
| 2024 | 2.07% | 4.43% |
| 2023 | 2.18% | 7.15% |
| 2022 | 1.76% | 10.94% |
| 2021 | 1.29% | 5.09% |
| 2020 | 1.59% | 7.81% |
| 2019 | 1.65% | 3.74% |
| 2018 | 1.77% | 4.16% |
| 2017 | 1.63% | 3.11% |
| 2016 | 1.80% | 2.73% |
| 2015 | 2.00% | 2.23% |
| 2014 | 2.68% | 1.76% |
| 2013 | 2.53% | 1.61% |
| 2012 | 3.17% | 1.41% |
| 2011 | 3.15% | 0.83% |
| 2010 | 3.14% | 0.59% |
| 2009 | 3.90% | 1.34% |
| 2008 | 3.84% | 10.57% |
| 2007 | 3.69% | 3.09% |
| 2006 | 3.77% | 1.88% |
| 2005 | 3.70% | 2.91% |
| 2004 | 4.18% | 3.37% |
| 2003 | 4.22% | 4.62% |
| 2002 | 6.01% | 5.67% |
| 2001 | 5.53% | 5.23% |
| 2000 | 5.74% | 5.25% |
| 1999 | 1.41% | 1.66% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks