StockComparison Logo
vs

COST vs AMAT

Comparison between Costco Wholesale Corp (COST, Company) and Applied Materials Inc (AMAT, Company).

COST is from the Consumer Defensive sector, while AMAT is from the Technology sector.

5-Year PerformanceAMAT has outperformed COST, delivering a return of +31.6% compared to +17.9%

COST vs AMAT - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
COST
$418B
Winner
AMAT
$424B
Max Drawdown
Winner
COST
53.39%
AMAT
85.83%
Sharpe Ratio
COST
-0.03
Winner
AMAT
2.06
5Y Beta
Winner
COST
0.35
AMAT
1.95
Industry
COST
Discount Stores
AMAT
Semiconductor Equipment & Materials
P/E Ratio
Winner
COST
47.28
AMAT
48.75
Forward P/E
COST
42.02
Winner
AMAT
32.15
PEG Ratio
COST
3.73
Winner
AMAT
1.33
Dividend Yield
Winner
COST
0.56%
AMAT
0.37%
5Y Dividends CAGR
COST
-11.90%
Winner
AMAT
29.13%
5Y EPS CAGR
COST
13.27%
Winner
AMAT
27.08%
Debt to Equity
Winner
COST
16.92%
AMAT
27.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
COST
2.11%
AMAT
1.26%
P/S Ratio
Winner
COST
1.42
AMAT
14.61
P/B Ratio
Winner
COST
12.60
AMAT
16.86

COST vs AMAT - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
COST
+0.19%
AMAT
-2.77%
3M
COST
-6.20%
Winner
AMAT
+31.46%
6M
COST
-5.04%
Winner
AMAT
+67.59%
1Y
COST
-2.46%
Winner
AMAT
+196.57%
5Y(CAGR)
COST
+17.85%
Winner
AMAT
+31.55%
10Y(CAGR)
COST
+20.99%
Winner
AMAT
+36.49%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
COST
+14.36%
AMAT
+14.08%

COST vs AMAT - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearCOSTAMAT
2026+11.41%+101.02%
2025-4.72%+58.42%
2024+41.64%+6.17%
2023+50.03%+69.11%
2022-18.91%-38.55%
2021+50.47%+82.41%
2020+33.72%+40.61%
2019+44.95%+85.68%
2018+9.30%-37.28%
2017+22.66%+61.50%
2016+1.51%+77.56%
2015+19.11%-23.63%
2014+21.70%+44.75%
2013+18.56%+53.27%
2012+26.50%+10.29%
2011+16.31%-21.94%
2010+23.17%+0.47%
2009+12.51%+33.36%
2008-22.17%-40.93%
2007+33.29%-2.44%
2006+6.93%+1.68%
2005+4.29%+7.22%
2004+34.26%-22.62%
2003+28.16%+60.52%
2002-36.87%-37.46%
2001+7.74%+1.52%
2000-10.25%-39.62%
1999+16.15%+44.39%

COST vs AMAT Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for COST was -53.39%, occurring on Dec 24, 2002. Recovery took 1551 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for AMAT was -85.22%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 4312 trading sessions.

The current COST drawdown is -13.25%. The current AMAT drawdown is -25.43%.

RankCOSTAMAT
#1-53.39%
May 1, 2000 - Jul 3, 2006
-85.22%
Apr 7, 2000 - May 31, 2017
#2-48.03%
Jul 8, 2008 - Dec 20, 2010
-55.14%
Jan 14, 2022 - Dec 26, 2023
#3-31.40%
Apr 7, 2022 - Dec 5, 2023
-52.27%
Mar 9, 2018 - Nov 15, 2019
#4-22.02%
Sep 11, 2018 - Apr 1, 2019
-49.88%
Jul 10, 2024 - Nov 28, 2025
#5-20.74%
Feb 13, 2025 - May 18, 2026
-43.64%
Feb 19, 2020 - Aug 14, 2020
#6-20.65%
Feb 3, 2000 - Mar 16, 2000
-39.63%
Jun 30, 2026 - Jul 29, 2026
#7-19.49%
Dec 1, 2020 - May 27, 2021
-22.06%
Nov 21, 2017 - Feb 26, 2018
#8-18.54%
Jul 3, 2006 - Feb 15, 2007
-19.69%
Apr 5, 2021 - Sep 16, 2021
#9-17.43%
Jun 7, 2017 - Nov 30, 2017
-18.39%
Aug 14, 2020 - Nov 5, 2020
#10-16.57%
May 19, 2026 - Jul 9, 2026
-18.19%
Feb 25, 2026 - Apr 9, 2026
#11-16.23%
Dec 7, 2007 - May 1, 2008
-17.82%
Mar 27, 2000 - Apr 7, 2000
#12-15.93%
Dec 29, 2021 - Mar 29, 2022
-13.95%
Feb 24, 2021 - Mar 26, 2021
#13-15.86%
Dec 8, 2015 - Jul 19, 2016
-13.54%
Jun 8, 2017 - Jul 26, 2017
#14-15.80%
May 19, 2011 - Sep 16, 2011
-13.11%
Sep 16, 2021 - Nov 4, 2021
#15-15.60%
Aug 12, 2016 - Feb 8, 2017
-12.81%
Jan 29, 2026 - Feb 13, 2026

Correlation

Correlation between COST and AMAT is 0.87 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.87
-101

Dividend Comparison (2004 - 2026)

COST vs AMAT dividend yield comparison.

YearCOSTAMAT
20260.45%0.18%
20250.59%0.69%
20240.49%0.93%
20232.87%0.75%
20220.76%1.05%
20210.54%0.60%
20203.38%1.01%
20190.86%1.36%
20181.08%2.14%
20174.81%0.78%
20161.09%1.24%
20154.06%2.14%
20140.97%1.61%
20131.01%2.21%
20128.17%3.06%
20111.11%2.89%
20101.10%1.92%
20091.18%1.72%
20081.19%2.37%
20070.81%1.30%
20060.96%0.98%
20050.90%0.50%
20040.62%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare