COO vs RMBS

Comparison between Cooper Companies Inc (COO, Company) and Rambus Inc (RMBS, Company).

COO is from the Healthcare sector, while RMBS is from the Technology sector.

5-Year PerformanceRMBS has outperformed COO, delivering a return of +39.9% compared to -6.5%

COO vs RMBS - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	COO(COMPANY)	RMBS(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$13B	$13B
Max Drawdown	86.96%	97.16%
Sharpe Ratio	0.02	1.23
5Y Beta	0.66	2.56
Industry	Medical Instruments & Supplies	Semiconductors
P/E Ratio	57.50	58.36
Forward P/E	14.75	24.15
PEG Ratio	0.69	5.69
5Y Dividends CAGR	8.45%	N/A
5Y EPS CAGR	-36.92%	N/A
Debt to Equity	29.84%	0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield	4.25%	2.49%
P/S Ratio	3.17	18.67
P/B Ratio	1.63	9.66

Market Cap

COO

$13B

Winner

RMBS

$13B

Max Drawdown

Winner

COO

86.96%

RMBS

97.16%

Sharpe Ratio

COO

0.02

Winner

RMBS

1.23

5Y Beta

Winner

COO

0.66

RMBS

2.56

Industry

COO

Medical Instruments & Supplies

RMBS

Semiconductors

P/E Ratio

Winner

COO

57.50

RMBS

58.36

Forward P/E

Winner

COO

14.75

RMBS

24.15

PEG Ratio

Winner

COO

0.69

RMBS

5.69

5Y Dividends CAGR

COO

8.45%

RMBS

N/A

5Y EPS CAGR

COO

-36.92%

RMBS

N/A

Debt to Equity

COO

29.84%

Winner

RMBS

0.00%

Free Cash Flow Yield

Winner

COO

4.25%

RMBS

2.49%

P/S Ratio

Winner

COO

3.17

RMBS

18.67

P/B Ratio

Winner

COO

1.63

RMBS

9.66

COO vs RMBS - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	COO	RMBS
1 month	+13.88%	-21.33%
3 months	-1.13%	+28.94%
6 months	-14.45%	+30.92%
1 year	+1.58%	+99.82%
5 years(CAGR)	-6.54%	+39.94%
10 years(CAGR)	+5.43%	+26.51%
Max(CAGR)	+12.27%	+7.83%

Winner

COO

+13.88%

RMBS

-21.33%

COO

-1.13%

Winner

RMBS

+28.94%

COO

-14.45%

Winner

RMBS

+30.92%

COO

+1.58%

Winner

RMBS

+99.82%

5Y(CAGR)

COO

-6.54%

Winner

RMBS

+39.94%

10Y(CAGR)

COO

+5.43%

Winner

RMBS

+26.51%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

COO

+12.27%

RMBS

+7.83%

COO vs RMBS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	COO	RMBS
2026	-12.91%	+24.59%
2025	-9.60%	+71.76%
2024	-1.44%	-18.99%
2023	+13.77%	+94.89%
2022	-21.55%	+22.17%
2021	+17.28%	+67.94%
2020	+12.39%	+25.34%
2019	+28.22%	+71.97%
2018	+15.38%	-46.33%
2017	+24.43%	+0.42%
2016	+32.72%	+18.81%
2015	-16.41%	+1.13%
2014	+31.78%	+16.00%
2013	+30.21%	+80.73%
2012	+30.79%	-39.95%
2011	+24.16%	-63.17%
2010	+49.48%	-11.84%
2009	+104.73%	+39.51%
2008	-56.81%	-22.08%
2007	-13.11%	+9.29%
2006	-13.14%	+4.01%
2005	-27.13%	-29.24%
2004	+49.60%	-24.71%
2003	+83.81%	+332.39%
2002	+2.76%	-19.54%
2001	+25.41%	-76.42%
2000	+35.53%	+109.45%
1999	+13.74%	+1.60%

COO vs RMBS Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for COO was -86.90%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 1785 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for RMBS was -97.16%, occurring on Jun 26, 2002. Recovery took 6430 trading sessions.

The current COO drawdown is -38.00%. The current RMBS drawdown is -27.52%.

Rank	COO	RMBS
#1	-86.90% Mar 7, 2005 - Apr 5, 2012	-97.16% Jun 26, 2000 - Jan 21, 2026
#2	-48.24% Sep 3, 2021 - May 11, 2026	-66.16% Mar 13, 2000 - Jun 23, 2000
#3	-35.99% Mar 30, 2015 - Sep 15, 2016	-36.69% Jan 21, 2026 - Apr 17, 2026
#4	-32.37% Jan 22, 2020 - Oct 12, 2020	-29.75% Apr 24, 2026 - Jun 2, 2026
#5	-28.92% Aug 23, 2001 - Oct 3, 2002	-28.41% Nov 8, 1999 - Feb 14, 2000
#6	-28.17% Jul 6, 2000 - Dec 27, 2000	-27.52% Jun 3, 2026 - Jun 25, 2026
#7	-22.50% Dec 9, 2002 - May 12, 2003	-14.36% Feb 29, 2000 - Mar 6, 2000
#8	-21.99% Jan 20, 2000 - Mar 23, 2000	-11.61% Feb 15, 2000 - Feb 22, 2000
#9	-18.34% Apr 27, 2012 - Sep 7, 2012	-2.39% Feb 24, 2000 - Feb 28, 2000
#10	-17.66% Jul 29, 2019 - Jan 15, 2020	-1.17% Mar 7, 2000 - Mar 9, 2000
#11	-17.38% Dec 3, 2018 - Feb 19, 2019	-0.90% Feb 22, 2000 - Feb 24, 2000
#12	-16.15% Apr 9, 2001 - Jun 27, 2001	-0.05% Apr 17, 2026 - Apr 21, 2026
#13	-16.01% Sep 15, 2016 - Feb 9, 2017	N/A
#14	-14.52% Jul 19, 2017 - Jul 25, 2018	N/A
#15	-13.07% Sep 10, 2013 - Mar 7, 2014	N/A