COMB vs MHF
Comparison between GRANITESHARES BLOOMBERG COMMODITY BROAD STRATEGY NO K-1 ETF (COMB, ETF) and Western Asset Municipal High Income Fund Inc (MHF, ETF).
5-Year PerformanceCOMB has outperformed MHF, delivering a return of +10.5% compared to +1.3%
COMB vs MHF - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
COMB vs MHF - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
COMB vs MHF - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | COMB | MHF |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +22.07% | +2.36% |
| 2025 | +14.51% | +5.62% |
| 2024 | +5.89% | +11.13% |
| 2023 | -6.04% | +3.08% |
| 2022 | +14.58% | -17.27% |
| 2021 | +26.25% | +10.73% |
| 2020 | -2.87% | +2.74% |
| 2019 | +6.97% | +11.83% |
| 2018 | -11.88% | -2.40% |
| 2017 | +4.97% | +7.69% |
| 2016 | N/A | -4.81% |
| 2015 | N/A | +6.80% |
| 2014 | N/A | +20.30% |
| 2013 | N/A | -12.41% |
| 2012 | N/A | +6.95% |
| 2011 | N/A | +16.94% |
| 2010 | N/A | +3.58% |
| 2009 | N/A | +18.79% |
| 2008 | N/A | -6.14% |
| 2007 | N/A | -3.49% |
| 2006 | N/A | +15.59% |
| 2005 | N/A | +6.05% |
| 2004 | N/A | -0.82% |
| 2003 | N/A | +9.44% |
| 2002 | N/A | -2.15% |
| 2001 | N/A | +2.25% |
| 2000 | N/A | +21.56% |
| 1999 | N/A | -5.06% |
COMB vs MHF Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for COMB was -33.50%, occurring on Apr 21, 2020. Recovery took 735 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for MHF was -29.95%, occurring on Oct 6, 2008. Recovery took 412 trading sessions.
The current COMB drawdown is -7.76%. The current MHF drawdown is -6.19%.
| Rank | COMB | MHF |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -33.50% May 23, 2018 - Apr 26, 2021 | -29.95% Jul 9, 2008 - Feb 26, 2010 |
| #2 | -26.48% Jun 7, 2022 - Jan 22, 2026 | -26.72% Oct 25, 2021 - Feb 19, 2025 |
| #3 | -10.79% Mar 8, 2022 - Apr 18, 2022 | -24.97% Feb 25, 2020 - Jan 26, 2021 |
| #4 | -10.77% Oct 25, 2021 - Jan 26, 2022 | -24.71% Sep 26, 2012 - Dec 2, 2015 |
| #5 | -8.24% Apr 18, 2022 - Jun 6, 2022 | -14.28% May 12, 2016 - Sep 19, 2017 |
| #6 | -7.76% May 12, 2026 - Jun 5, 2026 | -14.13% Sep 28, 2010 - Sep 9, 2011 |
| #7 | -7.69% Jan 29, 2026 - Mar 4, 2026 | -13.32% Mar 25, 2025 - Sep 19, 2025 |
| #8 | -6.50% Jul 29, 2021 - Sep 13, 2021 | -13.25% Nov 12, 1999 - Jul 5, 2000 |
| #9 | -5.81% Jan 26, 2018 - May 21, 2018 | -12.46% May 10, 2007 - May 30, 2008 |
| #10 | -5.75% May 24, 2017 - Jul 28, 2017 | -11.92% Aug 24, 2001 - Jun 13, 2003 |
| #11 | -5.49% Jun 10, 2021 - Jul 2, 2021 | -10.85% Mar 23, 2004 - May 26, 2005 |
| #12 | -5.26% Nov 6, 2017 - Jan 2, 2018 | -9.99% Sep 19, 2017 - May 23, 2019 |
| #13 | -5.06% Mar 18, 2026 - Mar 31, 2026 | -9.96% Sep 19, 2025 - Mar 27, 2026 |
| #14 | -4.38% Apr 6, 2026 - Apr 28, 2026 | -9.23% Feb 27, 2012 - May 1, 2012 |
| #15 | -3.76% May 11, 2021 - Jun 1, 2021 | -8.80% Jul 1, 2021 - Oct 25, 2021 |
Correlation
Correlation between COMB and MHF is 0.58 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
COMB vs MHF dividend yield comparison.
| Year | COMB | MHF |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.00% | 2.48% |
| 2025 | 9.05% | 5.93% |
| 2024 | 2.48% | 5.65% |
| 2023 | 6.57% | 3.78% |
| 2022 | 30.85% | 3.72% |
| 2021 | 15.83% | 3.23% |
| 2020 | 0.07% | 3.75% |
| 2019 | 1.48% | 4.02% |
| 2018 | 0.97% | 4.42% |
| 2017 | 0.20% | 4.14% |
| 2016 | 0.00% | 4.53% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 4.45% |
| 2014 | 0.00% | 4.73% |
| 2013 | 0.00% | 5.59% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 5.13% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 5.57% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 6.14% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 5.98% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 6.66% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 5.66% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 4.92% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 6.10% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 7.38% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 7.22% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 7.46% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 7.17% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 7.16% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 1.34% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks