COGT vs EAT

Comparison between Cogent Biosciences Inc (COGT, Company) and Brinker International Inc (EAT, Company).

COGT is from the Healthcare sector, while EAT is from the Consumer Cyclical sector.

5-Year PerformanceCOGT has outperformed EAT, delivering a return of +31.0% compared to +16.6%

COGT vs EAT - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	COGT(COMPANY)	EAT(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$5.62B	$5.63B
Max Drawdown	98.09%	88.76%
Sharpe Ratio	1.84	-0.12
5Y Beta	1.78	1.17
Industry	Biotechnology	Restaurants
P/E Ratio	-13.54	12.39
Forward P/E	N/A	11.29
PEG Ratio	-63.94	0.30
5Y Dividends CAGR	N/A	7.56%
5Y EPS CAGR	-15.32%	134.57%
Debt to Equity	36.72%	0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield	-5.09%	8.97%

Market Cap

COGT

$5.62B

Winner

EAT

$5.63B

Max Drawdown

COGT

98.09%

Winner

EAT

88.76%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

COGT

1.84

EAT

-0.12

5Y Beta

COGT

1.78

Winner

EAT

1.17

Industry

COGT

Biotechnology

EAT

Restaurants

P/E Ratio

Winner

COGT

-13.54

EAT

12.39

Forward P/E

COGT

N/A

EAT

11.29

PEG Ratio

Winner

COGT

-63.94

EAT

0.30

5Y Dividends CAGR

COGT

N/A

EAT

7.56%

5Y EPS CAGR

COGT

-15.32%

Winner

EAT

134.57%

Debt to Equity

COGT

36.72%

Winner

EAT

0.00%

Free Cash Flow Yield

COGT

-5.09%

Winner

EAT

8.97%

COGT vs EAT - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	COGT	EAT
1 month	-11.01%	-17.17%
3 months	-11.82%	-10.50%
6 months	-5.12%	+3.15%
1 year	+520.06%	-12.62%
5 years(CAGR)	+31.02%	+16.57%
10 years(CAGR)	-3.62%	+13.04%
Max(CAGR)	-3.62%	+11.65%

Winner

COGT

-11.01%

EAT

-17.17%

COGT

-11.82%

Winner

EAT

-10.50%

COGT

-5.12%

Winner

EAT

+3.15%

Winner

COGT

+520.06%

EAT

-12.62%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

COGT

+31.02%

EAT

+16.57%

10Y(CAGR)

COGT

-3.62%

Winner

EAT

+13.04%

Max(CAGR)

COGT

-3.62%

Winner

EAT

+11.65%

COGT vs EAT - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	COGT	EAT
2026	-5.22%	-13.45%
2025	+355.38%	+4.25%
2024	+25.00%	+214.45%
2023	-46.88%	+33.19%
2022	+32.87%	-15.29%
2021	-30.24%	-31.71%
2020	+288.85%	+35.41%
2019	-83.89%	-2.94%
2018	-60.40%	+15.34%
2017	N/A	-17.84%
2016	N/A	+7.61%
2015	N/A	-16.52%
2014	N/A	+31.31%
2013	N/A	+48.16%
2012	N/A	+20.09%
2011	N/A	+28.59%
2010	N/A	+46.71%
2009	N/A	+37.16%
2008	N/A	-42.24%
2007	N/A	-32.98%
2006	N/A	+19.92%
2005	N/A	+11.06%
2004	N/A	+6.11%
2003	N/A	+1.72%
2002	N/A	+9.73%
2001	N/A	+24.21%
2000	N/A	+79.79%
1999	N/A	+4.05%

COGT vs EAT Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for COGT was -98.09%, occurring on Mar 16, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for EAT was -88.40%, occurring on Nov 21, 2008. Recovery took 1304 trading sessions.

The current COGT drawdown is -50.92%. The current EAT drawdown is -30.67%.

Rank	COGT	EAT
#1	-98.09% Jul 31, 2018 - Mar 16, 2020	-88.40% Feb 20, 2007 - Apr 23, 2012
#2	-14.94% Apr 23, 2018 - May 31, 2018	-85.67% Feb 19, 2015 - Dec 9, 2020
#3	-14.54% Jul 13, 2018 - Jul 31, 2018	-71.67% Mar 15, 2021 - Sep 23, 2024
#4	-11.18% Jun 20, 2018 - Jul 13, 2018	-45.92% Feb 3, 2025 - Nov 6, 2025
#5	-10.98% Jun 5, 2018 - Jun 18, 2018	-30.45% Mar 9, 2001 - Jan 7, 2002
#6	-3.42% Mar 29, 2018 - Apr 12, 2018	-29.14% Mar 6, 2002 - Jun 3, 2003
#7	-0.17% Apr 18, 2018 - Apr 23, 2018	-25.79% Mar 17, 2006 - Oct 24, 2006
#8	N/A	-25.42% Mar 5, 2004 - Jun 9, 2005
#9	N/A	-25.13% May 16, 2000 - Oct 9, 2000
#10	N/A	-23.80% Jan 20, 2000 - Mar 16, 2000
#11	N/A	-20.21% Sep 10, 2012 - Mar 8, 2013
#12	N/A	-19.91% Jul 8, 2003 - Feb 12, 2004
#13	N/A	-18.97% Feb 28, 2014 - Oct 30, 2014
#14	N/A	-18.62% Nov 15, 1999 - Jan 10, 2000
#15	N/A	-17.70% Dec 4, 2000 - Feb 16, 2001