CNO vs TGS
Comparison between CNO Financial Group Inc (CNO, Company) and Transportadora de Gas del Sur (TGS, Company).
CNO is from the Financial Services sector, while TGS is from the Energy sector.
5-Year PerformanceTGS has outperformed CNO, delivering a return of +45.4% compared to +14.4%
CNO vs TGS - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CNO vs TGS - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CNO vs TGS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CNO | TGS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +12.72% | -2.73% |
| 2025 | +16.32% | -4.04% |
| 2024 | +35.52% | +92.82% |
| 2023 | +23.60% | +30.54% |
| 2022 | -3.97% | +162.22% |
| 2021 | +12.39% | -16.07% |
| 2020 | +25.30% | -25.93% |
| 2019 | +23.59% | -43.85% |
| 2018 | -38.00% | -31.16% |
| 2017 | +30.34% | +131.08% |
| 2016 | +5.54% | +50.44% |
| 2015 | +13.58% | +77.04% |
| 2014 | -0.30% | +74.73% |
| 2013 | +89.11% | +37.21% |
| 2012 | +47.76% | -36.75% |
| 2011 | -11.38% | -26.78% |
| 2010 | +28.90% | +88.65% |
| 2009 | +6.16% | +40.74% |
| 2008 | -58.39% | -65.37% |
| 2007 | -37.67% | -19.32% |
| 2006 | -14.40% | +37.76% |
| 2005 | +15.79% | +2.53% |
| 2004 | -8.11% | +8.21% |
| 2003 | +9.00% | +215.43% |
| 2002 | N/A | -76.61% |
| 2001 | N/A | -19.14% |
| 2000 | N/A | -19.10% |
| 1999 | N/A | +9.71% |
CNO vs TGS Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CNO was -98.99%, occurring on Mar 10, 2009. Recovery took 2896 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for TGS was -92.63%, occurring on Jun 7, 2002. Recovery took 1750 trading sessions.
The current CNO drawdown is -0.98%. The current TGS drawdown is -15.18%.
| Rank | CNO | TGS |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -98.99% Apr 5, 2006 - Oct 5, 2017 | -92.63% Jul 14, 2000 - Jul 3, 2007 |
| #2 | -63.84% Jan 11, 2018 - Feb 24, 2021 | -83.08% Jul 5, 2007 - Mar 9, 2015 |
| #3 | -38.01% May 17, 2021 - Nov 24, 2023 | -80.57% Dec 20, 2017 - May 30, 2024 |
| #4 | -33.75% Apr 12, 2004 - Jan 9, 2006 | -39.49% Jan 7, 2025 - Jan 27, 2026 |
| #5 | -16.97% Sep 11, 2003 - Dec 29, 2003 | -35.69% Mar 20, 2015 - Oct 29, 2015 |
| #6 | -15.86% Apr 2, 2025 - Dec 15, 2025 | -23.46% Nov 20, 2015 - Oct 5, 2016 |
| #7 | -11.42% Jan 22, 2004 - Apr 12, 2004 | -21.58% May 30, 2024 - Sep 4, 2024 |
| #8 | -11.33% Nov 26, 2024 - Feb 7, 2025 | -18.94% Apr 2, 2026 - May 20, 2026 |
| #9 | -11.03% Feb 6, 2026 - Apr 28, 2026 | -17.47% Feb 17, 2000 - Jul 12, 2000 |
| #10 | -10.64% Jul 31, 2024 - Aug 30, 2024 | -14.75% Jan 27, 2026 - Mar 24, 2026 |
| #11 | -10.29% Dec 28, 2023 - May 9, 2024 | -14.10% Oct 21, 2016 - Nov 25, 2016 |
| #12 | -9.74% Mar 15, 2021 - May 6, 2021 | -13.94% Sep 16, 2024 - Oct 24, 2024 |
| #13 | -7.86% Jan 8, 2026 - Feb 6, 2026 | -13.41% Jul 5, 2017 - Aug 14, 2017 |
| #14 | -7.59% Aug 30, 2024 - Sep 18, 2024 | -13.33% Dec 16, 1999 - Feb 17, 2000 |
| #15 | -7.45% May 17, 2024 - Jul 11, 2024 | -12.40% Apr 17, 2017 - Jun 2, 2017 |
Correlation
Correlation between CNO and TGS is 0.86 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
CNO vs TGS dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CNO | TGS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.36% | 0.00% |
| 2025 | 1.58% | 0.00% |
| 2024 | 1.69% | 0.00% |
| 2023 | 2.11% | 0.00% |
| 2022 | 2.41% | 0.00% |
| 2021 | 2.14% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 2.11% | 0.00% |
| 2019 | 2.37% | 14.46% |
| 2018 | 2.62% | 5.04% |
| 2017 | 1.42% | 0.00% |
| 2016 | 1.62% | 0.34% |
| 2015 | 1.41% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 1.39% | 4.85% |
| 2013 | 0.62% | 8.71% |
| 2012 | 0.64% | 9.41% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 49.21% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 0.34% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 0.88% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 3.39% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 11.26% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 8.62% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks