CMU vs PLTG

Comparison between MFS High Yield Municipal Trust (CMU, ETF) and LEVERAGE SHARES 2X LONG PLTR DAILY ETF (PLTG, ETF).

CMU vs PLTG - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	CMU(ETF)	PLTG(ETF)
Net Assets	$47M	$47M
Max Drawdown	62.40%	75.31%
Sharpe Ratio	0.59	-0.04
5Y Beta	0.10	3.53
5Y Dividends CAGR	5.31%	N/A

Net Assets

Winner

CMU

$47M

PLTG

$47M

Max Drawdown

Winner

CMU

62.40%

PLTG

75.31%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

CMU

0.59

PLTG

-0.04

5Y Beta

Winner

CMU

0.10

PLTG

3.53

5Y Dividends CAGR

CMU

5.31%

PLTG

N/A

CMU vs PLTG - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	CMU	PLTG
1 month	-2.42%	-15.14%
3 months	-4.36%	-38.06%
6 months	+1.57%	-60.88%
1 year	+9.28%	-40.43%
5 years(CAGR)	-1.33%	N/A
10 years(CAGR)	+1.58%	N/A
Max(CAGR)	+4.15%	-18.25%

Winner

CMU

-2.42%

PLTG

-15.14%

Winner

CMU

-4.36%

PLTG

-38.06%

Winner

CMU

+1.57%

PLTG

-60.88%

Winner

CMU

+9.28%

PLTG

-40.43%

5Y(CAGR)

CMU

-1.33%

PLTG

N/A

10Y(CAGR)

CMU

+1.58%

PLTG

N/A

Max(CAGR)

Winner

CMU

+4.15%

PLTG

-18.25%

CMU vs PLTG - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	CMU	PLTG
2026	+0.80%	-52.32%
2025	+5.08%	+87.72%
2024	+11.57%	N/A
2023	+9.93%	N/A
2022	-27.51%	N/A
2021	+7.14%	N/A
2020	-2.97%	N/A
2019	+15.00%	N/A
2018	-4.85%	N/A
2017	+9.07%	N/A
2016	+3.06%	N/A
2015	+8.58%	N/A
2014	+11.97%	N/A
2013	-11.33%	N/A
2012	+11.02%	N/A
2011	+17.45%	N/A
2010	+5.32%	N/A
2009	+65.81%	N/A
2008	-38.99%	N/A
2007	-15.35%	N/A
2006	+15.27%	N/A
2005	+1.30%	N/A
2004	+7.63%	N/A
2003	+9.50%	N/A
2002	+8.27%	N/A
2001	+7.99%	N/A
2000	-1.55%	N/A
1999	-6.38%	N/A

CMU vs PLTG Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CMU was -57.26%, occurring on Dec 16, 2008. Recovery took 848 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for PLTG was -70.99%, occurring on Jun 12, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current CMU drawdown is -10.68%. The current PLTG drawdown is -70.99%.

Rank	CMU	PLTG
#1	-57.26% May 21, 2007 - Sep 30, 2010	-70.99% Nov 3, 2025 - Jun 12, 2026
#2	-37.22% Sep 1, 2021 - Oct 31, 2022	-34.69% Aug 8, 2025 - Oct 29, 2025
#3	-32.82% Feb 25, 2020 - May 4, 2021	-24.61% May 2, 2025 - May 13, 2025
#4	-23.41% Apr 22, 2013 - Feb 3, 2015	-19.04% Jun 26, 2025 - Jul 14, 2025
#5	-16.02% Aug 23, 2016 - Oct 19, 2017	-18.83% Jun 3, 2025 - Jun 11, 2025
#6	-15.71% Nov 5, 2010 - Oct 17, 2011	-15.10% May 14, 2025 - May 30, 2025
#7	-14.29% Nov 3, 1999 - Aug 10, 2000	-6.58% Jul 17, 2025 - Jul 23, 2025
#8	-14.22% Mar 9, 2004 - Oct 19, 2004	-5.87% Jul 25, 2025 - Aug 4, 2025
#9	-13.94% Aug 11, 2000 - Jan 31, 2001	-5.57% Jun 16, 2025 - Jun 24, 2025
#10	-11.98% Aug 24, 2001 - Jun 3, 2002	-3.95% Oct 29, 2025 - Oct 31, 2025
#11	-10.37% Oct 19, 2017 - Feb 1, 2019	-3.65% Apr 30, 2025 - May 2, 2025
#12	-10.31% Feb 14, 2005 - Jan 25, 2006	-1.13% Jun 11, 2025 - Jun 13, 2025
#13	-10.14% Mar 4, 2015 - Oct 30, 2015	-0.90% Jul 14, 2025 - Jul 16, 2025
#14	-8.79% Sep 23, 2002 - Apr 23, 2003	-0.24% May 30, 2025 - Jun 3, 2025
#15	-8.20% Sep 26, 2012 - Apr 15, 2013	N/A

Correlation

Correlation between CMU and PLTG is -0.22 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.

-0.22

-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

CMU vs PLTG dividend yield comparison.

Year	CMU	PLTG
2026	5.02%	0.00%
2025	5.38%	18.14%
2024	4.69%	0.00%
2023	4.05%	0.00%
2022	5.57%	0.00%
2021	4.53%	0.00%
2020	4.93%	0.00%
2019	4.81%	0.00%
2018	6.09%	0.00%
2017	5.87%	0.00%
2016	6.13%	0.00%
2015	6.22%	0.00%
2014	6.63%	0.00%
2013	6.98%	0.00%
2012	6.69%	0.00%
2011	7.54%	0.00%
2010	8.17%	0.00%
2009	7.53%	0.00%
2008	11.70%	0.00%
2007	6.42%	0.00%
2006	5.82%	0.00%
2005	6.95%	0.00%
2004	7.47%	0.00%
2003	7.54%	0.00%
2002	7.58%	0.00%
2001	6.98%	0.00%
2000	3.27%	0.00%