CMU vs DWAW

Comparison between MFS High Yield Municipal Trust (CMU, ETF) and ADVISORSHARES DORSEY WRIGHT FSM ALL CAP WORLD ETF (DWAW, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceDWAW has outperformed CMU, delivering a return of +7.2% compared to -1.3%

CMU vs DWAW - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	CMU(ETF)	DWAW(ETF)
Net Assets	$96M	$95M
Expense Ratio	N/A	1.23%
Max Drawdown	62.40%	32.55%
Sharpe Ratio	0.59	1.25
5Y Beta	0.10	1.10
5Y Dividends CAGR	5.31%	N/A

Net Assets

Winner

CMU

$96M

DWAW

$95M

Expense Ratio

CMU

N/A

DWAW

1.23%

Max Drawdown

CMU

62.40%

Winner

DWAW

32.55%

Sharpe Ratio

CMU

0.59

Winner

DWAW

1.25

5Y Beta

Winner

CMU

0.10

DWAW

1.10

5Y Dividends CAGR

CMU

5.31%

DWAW

N/A

CMU vs DWAW - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	CMU	DWAW
1 month	-2.42%	+3.63%
3 months	-4.36%	+17.25%
6 months	+1.57%	+16.05%
1 year	+9.28%	+25.50%
5 years(CAGR)	-1.33%	+7.21%
10 years(CAGR)	+1.58%	N/A
Max(CAGR)	+4.15%	+12.32%

CMU

-2.42%

Winner

DWAW

+3.63%

CMU

-4.36%

Winner

DWAW

+17.25%

CMU

+1.57%

Winner

DWAW

+16.05%

CMU

+9.28%

Winner

DWAW

+25.50%

5Y(CAGR)

CMU

-1.33%

Winner

DWAW

+7.21%

10Y(CAGR)

CMU

+1.58%

DWAW

N/A

Max(CAGR)

CMU

+4.15%

Winner

DWAW

+12.32%

CMU vs DWAW - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	CMU	DWAW
2026	+0.80%	+14.29%
2025	+5.08%	+10.68%
2024	+11.57%	+20.32%
2023	+9.93%	+10.77%
2022	-27.51%	-17.57%
2021	+7.14%	+5.12%
2020	-2.97%	+46.82%
2019	+15.00%	-0.38%
2018	-4.85%	N/A
2017	+9.07%	N/A
2016	+3.06%	N/A
2015	+8.58%	N/A
2014	+11.97%	N/A
2013	-11.33%	N/A
2012	+11.02%	N/A
2011	+17.45%	N/A
2010	+5.32%	N/A
2009	+65.81%	N/A
2008	-38.99%	N/A
2007	-15.35%	N/A
2006	+15.27%	N/A
2005	+1.30%	N/A
2004	+7.63%	N/A
2003	+9.50%	N/A
2002	+8.27%	N/A
2001	+7.99%	N/A
2000	-1.55%	N/A
1999	-6.38%	N/A

CMU vs DWAW Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CMU was -57.26%, occurring on Dec 16, 2008. Recovery took 848 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for DWAW was -31.56%, occurring on Sep 30, 2022. Recovery took 852 trading sessions.

The current CMU drawdown is -10.68%. The current DWAW drawdown is -1.53%.

Rank	CMU	DWAW
#1	-57.26% May 21, 2007 - Sep 30, 2010	-31.56% Feb 12, 2021 - Jul 5, 2024
#2	-37.22% Sep 1, 2021 - Oct 31, 2022	-29.02% Feb 20, 2020 - Jun 5, 2020
#3	-32.82% Feb 25, 2020 - May 4, 2021	-22.91% Dec 6, 2024 - Aug 12, 2025
#4	-23.41% Apr 22, 2013 - Feb 3, 2015	-13.08% Jul 10, 2024 - Nov 7, 2024
#5	-16.02% Aug 23, 2016 - Oct 19, 2017	-11.58% Feb 25, 2026 - Apr 17, 2026
#6	-15.71% Nov 5, 2010 - Oct 17, 2011	-10.55% Sep 2, 2020 - Oct 13, 2020
#7	-14.29% Nov 3, 1999 - Aug 10, 2000	-8.01% Oct 13, 2020 - Nov 5, 2020
#8	-14.22% Mar 9, 2004 - Oct 19, 2004	-6.82% Oct 29, 2025 - Dec 24, 2025
#9	-13.94% Aug 11, 2000 - Jan 31, 2001	-5.23% Jun 10, 2020 - Jun 23, 2020
#10	-11.98% Aug 24, 2001 - Jun 3, 2002	-5.00% Jan 22, 2021 - Feb 4, 2021
#11	-10.37% Oct 19, 2017 - Feb 1, 2019	-4.92% Jun 2, 2026 - Jun 10, 2026
#12	-10.31% Feb 14, 2005 - Jan 25, 2006	-4.31% Dec 22, 2020 - Jan 7, 2021
#13	-10.14% Mar 4, 2015 - Oct 30, 2015	-3.70% Jun 23, 2020 - Jul 1, 2020
#14	-8.79% Sep 23, 2002 - Apr 23, 2003	-3.65% Jul 20, 2020 - Aug 3, 2020
#15	-8.20% Sep 26, 2012 - Apr 15, 2013	-3.52% Jan 29, 2026 - Feb 9, 2026

Correlation

Correlation between CMU and DWAW is 0.44 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.

0.44

-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

CMU vs DWAW dividend yield comparison.

Year	CMU	DWAW
2026	5.02%	0.00%
2025	5.38%	0.76%
2024	4.69%	0.00%
2023	4.05%	1.70%
2022	5.57%	0.53%
2021	4.53%	1.45%
2020	4.93%	0.16%
2019	4.81%	0.00%
2018	6.09%	0.00%
2017	5.87%	0.00%
2016	6.13%	0.00%
2015	6.22%	0.00%
2014	6.63%	0.00%
2013	6.98%	0.00%
2012	6.69%	0.00%
2011	7.54%	0.00%
2010	8.17%	0.00%
2009	7.53%	0.00%
2008	11.70%	0.00%
2007	6.42%	0.00%
2006	5.82%	0.00%
2005	6.95%	0.00%
2004	7.47%	0.00%
2003	7.54%	0.00%
2002	7.58%	0.00%
2001	6.98%	0.00%
2000	3.27%	0.00%