StockComparison Logo
vs

CMT vs PLG

Comparison between Core Molding Technologies (CMT, Company) and Platinum Group Metals Ltd (PLG, Company).

Both CMT and PLG are from the Basic Materials sector.

5-Year PerformanceCMT has outperformed PLG, delivering a return of +12.5% compared to -19.5%

CMT vs PLG - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
CMT
$205M
PLG
$204M
Max Drawdown
Winner
CMT
96.25%
PLG
99.81%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
CMT
0.98
PLG
0.23
5Y Beta
Winner
CMT
0.69
PLG
1.74
Industry
CMT
Specialty Chemicals
PLG
Other Precious Metals & Mining
P/E Ratio
CMT
138.77
Winner
PLG
-31.05
Forward P/E
Winner
CMT
21.55
PLG
120.48
PEG Ratio
CMT
0.36
Winner
PLG
-1.38
5Y EPS CAGR
Winner
CMT
-17.77%
PLG
-20.72%
Debt to Equity
CMT
12.18%
Winner
PLG
0.24%
Free Cash Flow Yield
CMT
-7.53%
Winner
PLG
-3.28%
P/S Ratio
CMT
0.75
PLG
N/A
P/B Ratio
Winner
CMT
1.29
PLG
3.02

CMT vs PLG - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
CMT
-10.24%
PLG
-18.97%
3M
Winner
CMT
+19.71%
PLG
-38.70%
6M
Winner
CMT
+22.45%
PLG
-42.68%
1Y
Winner
CMT
+43.32%
PLG
-11.32%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
CMT
+12.53%
PLG
-19.49%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
CMT
+6.07%
PLG
-26.55%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
CMT
+10.35%
PLG
-4.08%

CMT vs PLG - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearCMTPLG
2026+17.99%-39.48%
2025+28.53%+74.81%
2024-7.08%+13.27%
2023+41.45%-32.94%
2022+52.64%+2.96%
2021-36.25%-68.40%
2020+326.67%+159.22%
2019-57.46%+6.96%
2018-65.50%-57.43%
2017+31.58%-81.58%
2016+39.67%-1.24%
2015-7.83%-71.54%
2014+4.48%-57.66%
2013+102.96%+40.14%
2012-19.66%-13.47%
2011+37.35%-68.13%
2010+100.00%+21.46%
2009-0.35%+25.44%
2008-63.38%-63.72%
2007-24.41%+115.05%
2006+29.37%+50.00%
2005+177.17%+58.22%
2004-6.10%+27.82%
2003+165.45%+891.40%
2002-25.17%+68.42%
2001+67.05%N/A
2000-66.67%N/A
1999+36.69%N/A

CMT vs PLG Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CMT was -96.21%, occurring on Apr 8, 2020. Recovery took 2090 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for PLG was -99.81%, occurring on Jun 11, 2018. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current CMT drawdown is -22.56%. The current PLG drawdown is -99.70%.

RankCMTPLG
#1-96.21%
Jun 10, 2015 - Sep 28, 2023
-99.81%
Oct 29, 2007 - Jun 11, 2018
#2-90.74%
Jun 7, 2005 - Dec 27, 2013
-55.68%
Jan 29, 2003 - Sep 2, 2003
#3-76.87%
Dec 22, 1999 - Aug 25, 2003
-43.23%
Mar 8, 2004 - Jun 8, 2004
#4-55.95%
Oct 2, 2023 - Mar 3, 2025
-40.89%
Mar 9, 2005 - Aug 11, 2005
#5-42.96%
Mar 31, 2004 - Mar 22, 2005
-36.29%
Nov 5, 2003 - Dec 8, 2003
#6-26.50%
Apr 8, 2005 - Apr 28, 2005
-30.82%
Jan 23, 2004 - Mar 8, 2004
#7-22.48%
Mar 6, 2014 - Mar 18, 2015
-30.09%
May 12, 2006 - Nov 21, 2006
#8-19.19%
Oct 10, 2003 - Jan 21, 2004
-28.44%
Jun 25, 2004 - Sep 13, 2004
#9-17.02%
Nov 11, 1999 - Dec 2, 1999
-27.12%
Sep 25, 2003 - Oct 15, 2003
#10-16.01%
Dec 30, 2013 - Feb 14, 2014
-26.30%
Jul 2, 2007 - Oct 12, 2007
#11-15.07%
Jan 23, 2004 - Feb 10, 2004
-23.91%
Sep 13, 2004 - Oct 28, 2004
#12-13.77%
Mar 28, 2005 - Apr 6, 2005
-22.70%
Nov 7, 2005 - Mar 2, 2006
#13-13.74%
May 12, 2005 - May 20, 2005
-22.29%
Nov 23, 2004 - Mar 7, 2005
#14-12.89%
Dec 2, 1999 - Dec 16, 1999
-17.82%
Feb 16, 2007 - Mar 22, 2007
#15-10.86%
Nov 2, 1999 - Nov 11, 1999
-16.86%
May 14, 2007 - Jul 2, 2007

Correlation

Correlation between CMT and PLG is -0.37 which considered as a weak negative correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move in opposite directions.

-0.37
-101

Dividend Comparison (2003 - 2018)

CMT vs PLG dividend yield comparison.

YearCMTPLG
20181.41%0.00%
20170.46%0.00%
20040.00%91.47%
20030.00%67.75%

Select Stocks to Compare