CMT vs PLG
Comparison between Core Molding Technologies (CMT, Company) and Platinum Group Metals Ltd (PLG, Company).
Both CMT and PLG are from the Basic Materials sector.
5-Year PerformanceCMT has outperformed PLG, delivering a return of +12.5% compared to -19.5%
CMT vs PLG - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CMT vs PLG - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CMT vs PLG - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CMT | PLG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +17.99% | -39.48% |
| 2025 | +28.53% | +74.81% |
| 2024 | -7.08% | +13.27% |
| 2023 | +41.45% | -32.94% |
| 2022 | +52.64% | +2.96% |
| 2021 | -36.25% | -68.40% |
| 2020 | +326.67% | +159.22% |
| 2019 | -57.46% | +6.96% |
| 2018 | -65.50% | -57.43% |
| 2017 | +31.58% | -81.58% |
| 2016 | +39.67% | -1.24% |
| 2015 | -7.83% | -71.54% |
| 2014 | +4.48% | -57.66% |
| 2013 | +102.96% | +40.14% |
| 2012 | -19.66% | -13.47% |
| 2011 | +37.35% | -68.13% |
| 2010 | +100.00% | +21.46% |
| 2009 | -0.35% | +25.44% |
| 2008 | -63.38% | -63.72% |
| 2007 | -24.41% | +115.05% |
| 2006 | +29.37% | +50.00% |
| 2005 | +177.17% | +58.22% |
| 2004 | -6.10% | +27.82% |
| 2003 | +165.45% | +891.40% |
| 2002 | -25.17% | +68.42% |
| 2001 | +67.05% | N/A |
| 2000 | -66.67% | N/A |
| 1999 | +36.69% | N/A |
CMT vs PLG Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CMT was -96.21%, occurring on Apr 8, 2020. Recovery took 2090 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for PLG was -99.81%, occurring on Jun 11, 2018. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current CMT drawdown is -22.56%. The current PLG drawdown is -99.70%.
| Rank | CMT | PLG |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -96.21% Jun 10, 2015 - Sep 28, 2023 | -99.81% Oct 29, 2007 - Jun 11, 2018 |
| #2 | -90.74% Jun 7, 2005 - Dec 27, 2013 | -55.68% Jan 29, 2003 - Sep 2, 2003 |
| #3 | -76.87% Dec 22, 1999 - Aug 25, 2003 | -43.23% Mar 8, 2004 - Jun 8, 2004 |
| #4 | -55.95% Oct 2, 2023 - Mar 3, 2025 | -40.89% Mar 9, 2005 - Aug 11, 2005 |
| #5 | -42.96% Mar 31, 2004 - Mar 22, 2005 | -36.29% Nov 5, 2003 - Dec 8, 2003 |
| #6 | -26.50% Apr 8, 2005 - Apr 28, 2005 | -30.82% Jan 23, 2004 - Mar 8, 2004 |
| #7 | -22.48% Mar 6, 2014 - Mar 18, 2015 | -30.09% May 12, 2006 - Nov 21, 2006 |
| #8 | -19.19% Oct 10, 2003 - Jan 21, 2004 | -28.44% Jun 25, 2004 - Sep 13, 2004 |
| #9 | -17.02% Nov 11, 1999 - Dec 2, 1999 | -27.12% Sep 25, 2003 - Oct 15, 2003 |
| #10 | -16.01% Dec 30, 2013 - Feb 14, 2014 | -26.30% Jul 2, 2007 - Oct 12, 2007 |
| #11 | -15.07% Jan 23, 2004 - Feb 10, 2004 | -23.91% Sep 13, 2004 - Oct 28, 2004 |
| #12 | -13.77% Mar 28, 2005 - Apr 6, 2005 | -22.70% Nov 7, 2005 - Mar 2, 2006 |
| #13 | -13.74% May 12, 2005 - May 20, 2005 | -22.29% Nov 23, 2004 - Mar 7, 2005 |
| #14 | -12.89% Dec 2, 1999 - Dec 16, 1999 | -17.82% Feb 16, 2007 - Mar 22, 2007 |
| #15 | -10.86% Nov 2, 1999 - Nov 11, 1999 | -16.86% May 14, 2007 - Jul 2, 2007 |
Correlation
Correlation between CMT and PLG is -0.37 which considered as a weak negative correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move in opposite directions.
Dividend Comparison (2003 - 2018)
CMT vs PLG dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CMT | PLG |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 1.41% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 0.46% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 91.47% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 67.75% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks