CMI vs DUK
Comparison between Cummins Inc (CMI, Company) and Duke Energy Corp (DUK, Company).
CMI is from the Industrials sector, while DUK is from the Utilities sector.
5-Year PerformanceCMI has outperformed DUK, delivering a return of +23.5% compared to +8.3%
CMI vs DUK - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CMI vs DUK - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CMI vs DUK - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CMI | DUK |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +30.58% | +6.61% |
| 2025 | +49.77% | +12.65% |
| 2024 | +47.90% | +14.59% |
| 2023 | +2.24% | -2.31% |
| 2022 | +13.37% | +3.44% |
| 2021 | +0.88% | +21.57% |
| 2020 | +30.26% | +5.76% |
| 2019 | +38.35% | +12.35% |
| 2018 | -22.27% | +8.52% |
| 2017 | +29.79% | +12.80% |
| 2016 | +57.21% | +13.81% |
| 2015 | -38.15% | -11.30% |
| 2014 | +6.08% | +27.97% |
| 2013 | +26.66% | +10.90% |
| 2012 | +21.06% | +3.14% |
| 2011 | -20.14% | +29.89% |
| 2010 | +137.11% | +11.09% |
| 2009 | +60.12% | +18.92% |
| 2008 | -56.05% | -19.99% |
| 2007 | +117.98% | +10.15% |
| 2006 | +31.56% | +24.49% |
| 2005 | +10.76% | +14.38% |
| 2004 | +75.22% | +30.85% |
| 2003 | +74.78% | +9.85% |
| 2002 | -25.25% | -48.90% |
| 2001 | +5.32% | -2.50% |
| 2000 | -16.94% | +83.71% |
| 1999 | -3.05% | -9.78% |
CMI vs DUK Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CMI was -75.65%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 469 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for DUK was -71.89%, occurring on Mar 10, 2003. Recovery took 1500 trading sessions.
The current CMI drawdown is -5.08%. The current DUK drawdown is -6.96%.
| Rank | CMI | DUK |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -75.65% Jun 16, 2008 - Apr 27, 2010 | -71.89% Apr 26, 2001 - Apr 18, 2007 |
| #2 | -60.07% Apr 10, 2002 - Aug 12, 2003 | -38.89% Dec 13, 2007 - Sep 13, 2010 |
| #3 | -45.90% Jun 10, 2014 - Feb 9, 2017 | -37.37% Feb 21, 2020 - Apr 13, 2021 |
| #4 | -45.05% Nov 2, 1999 - Mar 19, 2002 | -26.75% Nov 30, 2000 - Apr 20, 2001 |
| #5 | -44.05% Nov 11, 2019 - Jun 8, 2020 | -24.16% May 27, 2022 - Jul 12, 2024 |
| #6 | -39.06% Oct 15, 2007 - May 13, 2008 | -23.07% Jan 29, 2015 - Jun 27, 2016 |
| #7 | -34.48% Mar 19, 2012 - Aug 12, 2013 | -19.02% Jan 27, 2000 - Apr 13, 2000 |
| #8 | -33.03% Apr 29, 2011 - Feb 3, 2012 | -18.13% Nov 14, 2017 - Nov 16, 2018 |
| #9 | -32.87% Jan 26, 2018 - Nov 8, 2019 | -18.07% Apr 25, 2007 - Dec 5, 2007 |
| #10 | -30.48% Mar 15, 2021 - Jul 31, 2023 | -16.23% Nov 2, 1999 - Jan 21, 2000 |
| #11 | -30.47% Feb 19, 2025 - Aug 7, 2025 | -14.77% Jul 6, 2016 - May 22, 2017 |
| #12 | -24.05% Dec 28, 2004 - Jul 22, 2005 | -12.51% Apr 29, 2013 - Apr 8, 2014 |
| #13 | -18.18% Aug 1, 2023 - Feb 15, 2024 | -12.20% Jun 18, 2012 - Jan 30, 2013 |
| #14 | -17.06% Apr 19, 2004 - Jul 26, 2004 | -11.61% Oct 18, 2024 - Mar 3, 2025 |
| #15 | -16.89% Oct 16, 2006 - Feb 2, 2007 | -10.90% Sep 12, 2000 - Sep 28, 2000 |
Correlation
Correlation between CMI and DUK is 0.94 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
CMI vs DUK dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CMI | DUK |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.29% | 0.86% |
| 2025 | 1.50% | 3.60% |
| 2024 | 2.01% | 3.84% |
| 2023 | 2.71% | 4.18% |
| 2022 | 2.49% | 3.86% |
| 2021 | 2.57% | 3.72% |
| 2020 | 2.33% | 4.17% |
| 2019 | 2.74% | 4.11% |
| 2018 | 3.32% | 4.21% |
| 2017 | 2.38% | 4.15% |
| 2016 | 2.93% | 4.33% |
| 2015 | 3.99% | 4.54% |
| 2014 | 1.95% | 3.77% |
| 2013 | 1.60% | 4.48% |
| 2012 | 1.66% | 4.75% |
| 2011 | 1.51% | 4.50% |
| 2010 | 0.80% | 5.45% |
| 2009 | 1.53% | 5.46% |
| 2008 | 2.24% | 6.00% |
| 2007 | 0.68% | 73.06% |
| 2006 | 1.12% | 3.79% |
| 2005 | 1.34% | 4.26% |
| 2004 | 1.43% | 4.34% |
| 2003 | 2.45% | 5.38% |
| 2002 | 4.27% | 5.63% |
| 2001 | 3.11% | 2.80% |
| 2000 | 3.16% | 3.06% |
| 1999 | 0.62% | 1.10% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks