CMA vs GIL
Comparison between Comerica Incorporated (CMA, Company) and Gildan Activewear Inc (GIL, Company).
CMA is from the Financial Services sector, while GIL is from the Consumer Cyclical sector.
5-Year PerformanceCMA has outperformed GIL, delivering a return of +14.3% compared to +12.4%
CMA vs GIL - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CMA vs GIL - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CMA vs GIL - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CMA | GIL |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +0.02% | -5.42% |
| 2025 | +47.73% | +35.97% |
| 2024 | +15.34% | +48.22% |
| 2023 | -10.13% | +22.94% |
| 2022 | -21.84% | -34.23% |
| 2021 | +62.57% | +57.61% |
| 2020 | -16.84% | -5.16% |
| 2019 | +6.79% | -1.10% |
| 2018 | -18.92% | -4.55% |
| 2017 | +27.74% | +29.06% |
| 2016 | +67.55% | -8.67% |
| 2015 | -7.96% | +2.50% |
| 2014 | +1.60% | +7.16% |
| 2013 | +54.41% | +47.48% |
| 2012 | +15.62% | +88.40% |
| 2011 | -38.85% | -32.99% |
| 2010 | +39.39% | +18.96% |
| 2009 | +42.39% | +99.84% |
| 2008 | -49.89% | -71.57% |
| 2007 | -22.81% | +75.37% |
| 2006 | +6.21% | +4.98% |
| 2005 | -2.43% | +151.83% |
| 2004 | +13.83% | +7.43% |
| 2003 | +30.32% | +30.02% |
| 2002 | -21.38% | +64.51% |
| 2001 | +0.62% | -26.93% |
| 2000 | +36.52% | +118.79% |
| 1999 | -20.19% | -3.67% |
CMA vs GIL Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CMA was -78.28%, occurring on Mar 5, 2009. Recovery took 2022 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for GIL was -87.23%, occurring on Mar 5, 2009. Recovery took 1443 trading sessions.
The current CMA drawdown is -10.06%. The current GIL drawdown is -17.99%.
| Rank | CMA | GIL |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -78.28% Jun 1, 2007 - Jun 12, 2015 | -87.23% Oct 30, 2007 - Jul 25, 2013 |
| #2 | -72.44% Mar 9, 2018 - Oct 22, 2021 | -74.42% Jul 16, 2019 - Aug 25, 2021 |
| #3 | -67.54% Jan 14, 2022 - Dec 4, 2025 | -53.93% Feb 6, 2001 - Jun 5, 2002 |
| #4 | -44.70% May 23, 2002 - Aug 18, 2004 | -37.99% Nov 16, 2021 - Jul 31, 2024 |
| #5 | -43.82% Nov 5, 1999 - Oct 2, 2000 | -35.01% Jul 30, 2015 - Dec 3, 2018 |
| #6 | -40.49% Jun 24, 2015 - Oct 19, 2016 | -32.77% Aug 29, 2000 - Feb 6, 2001 |
| #7 | -29.64% Mar 8, 2001 - Mar 6, 2002 | -31.28% Feb 20, 2025 - Aug 13, 2025 |
| #8 | -20.73% Oct 30, 2000 - Dec 28, 2000 | -27.56% Jun 19, 2002 - Dec 12, 2002 |
| #9 | -16.52% Jul 20, 2005 - Dec 27, 2006 | -27.06% Mar 14, 2006 - Nov 15, 2006 |
| #10 | -14.67% Oct 4, 2000 - Oct 30, 2000 | -25.70% Feb 13, 2026 - Mar 30, 2026 |
| #11 | -14.32% Jul 11, 2017 - Sep 27, 2017 | -23.30% Dec 15, 1999 - Jan 25, 2000 |
| #12 | -14.21% Nov 12, 2004 - Jul 20, 2005 | -22.82% Mar 5, 2004 - Dec 30, 2004 |
| #13 | -12.28% Mar 1, 2017 - Jun 14, 2017 | -16.85% Feb 11, 2000 - Apr 20, 2000 |
| #14 | -10.95% Nov 23, 2021 - Jan 4, 2022 | -15.64% May 21, 2007 - Sep 21, 2007 |
| #15 | -10.23% Jan 4, 2001 - Feb 16, 2001 | -15.60% Nov 22, 2006 - Mar 12, 2007 |
Correlation
Correlation between CMA and GIL is 0.82 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
CMA vs GIL dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CMA | GIL |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.00% | 0.42% |
| 2025 | 3.27% | 1.45% |
| 2024 | 4.59% | 1.74% |
| 2023 | 5.09% | 2.25% |
| 2022 | 4.07% | 2.47% |
| 2021 | 3.13% | 1.53% |
| 2020 | 4.87% | 0.55% |
| 2019 | 3.74% | 1.82% |
| 2018 | 2.68% | 1.48% |
| 2017 | 1.26% | 1.16% |
| 2016 | 1.31% | 1.23% |
| 2015 | 1.98% | 0.91% |
| 2014 | 1.69% | 0.80% |
| 2013 | 1.43% | 0.71% |
| 2012 | 1.81% | 0.86% |
| 2011 | 1.55% | 1.60% |
| 2010 | 0.59% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 0.68% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 11.64% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 5.88% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 4.02% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 3.88% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 3.41% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 3.57% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 4.44% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 3.07% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 2.69% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 0.77% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks