StockComparison Logo
vs

CLSM vs MGF

Comparison between ETC CABANA TARGET LEADING SECTOR MODERATE ETF (CLSM, ETF) and MFS Government Markets Income Trust (MGF, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceCLSM has outperformed MGF, delivering a return of +3.8% compared to -1.2%

CLSM vs MGF - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Net Assets
CLSM
$100M
Winner
MGF
$100M
Expense Ratio
CLSM
0.82%
MGF
N/A
Max Drawdown
Winner
CLSM
33.55%
MGF
64.71%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
CLSM
1.80
MGF
-0.45
5Y Beta
CLSM
0.75
Winner
MGF
0.05
5Y Dividends CAGR
CLSM
N/A
MGF
-7.75%

CLSM vs MGF - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
CLSM
+1.84%
MGF
-2.44%
3M
Winner
CLSM
+17.10%
MGF
-1.87%
6M
Winner
CLSM
+17.76%
MGF
-3.60%
1Y
Winner
CLSM
+30.15%
MGF
-1.24%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
CLSM
+3.82%
MGF
-1.23%
10Y(CAGR)
CLSM
N/A
MGF
+1.23%
Max(CAGR)
CLSM
+3.82%
Winner
MGF
+4.13%

CLSM vs MGF - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearCLSMMGF
2026+17.64%-3.25%
2025+15.26%+5.18%
2024+1.42%+4.18%
2023+3.95%+3.78%
2022-23.96%-15.17%
2021+9.10%+0.65%
2020N/A+7.32%
2019N/A+9.81%
2018N/A-0.14%
2017N/A+3.45%
2016N/A+2.52%
2015N/A-0.31%
2014N/A+6.04%
2013N/A-10.52%
2012N/A+5.17%
2011N/A+10.17%
2010N/A-0.19%
2009N/A+0.72%
2008N/A+26.75%
2007N/A+9.08%
2006N/A+6.49%
2005N/A+2.69%
2004N/A+3.30%
2003N/A+2.74%
2002N/A+15.23%
2001N/A+6.43%
2000N/A+17.98%
1999N/A-4.21%

CLSM vs MGF Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CLSM was -27.76%, occurring on Apr 8, 2025. Recovery took 1083 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for MGF was -22.85%, occurring on Oct 24, 2022. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current CLSM drawdown is -2.62%. The current MGF drawdown is -8.07%.

RankCLSMMGF
#1-27.76%
Dec 27, 2021 - Apr 22, 2026
-22.85%
Sep 17, 2021 - Oct 24, 2022
#2-5.43%
Jun 2, 2026 - Jun 10, 2026
-21.63%
Sep 8, 2008 - Nov 28, 2008
#3-5.24%
Sep 2, 2021 - Oct 21, 2021
-19.20%
Sep 5, 2012 - Aug 18, 2016
#4-4.61%
Nov 19, 2021 - Dec 27, 2021
-15.76%
Dec 23, 2008 - Aug 21, 2009
#5-2.26%
Jul 14, 2021 - Jul 22, 2021
-15.30%
Aug 23, 2010 - Jan 13, 2012
#6-2.16%
Nov 5, 2021 - Nov 19, 2021
-9.35%
Mar 9, 2020 - Apr 13, 2020
#7-1.92%
May 14, 2026 - May 26, 2026
-9.12%
Sep 23, 2009 - Mar 10, 2010
#8-1.91%
Jul 26, 2021 - Aug 23, 2021
-8.88%
Mar 19, 2004 - Jan 18, 2005
#9-1.05%
Apr 24, 2026 - Apr 30, 2026
-8.02%
May 27, 2008 - Sep 8, 2008
#10-0.62%
Aug 25, 2021 - Aug 27, 2021
-7.46%
Mar 16, 2010 - Jun 7, 2010
#11-0.50%
Oct 21, 2021 - Oct 25, 2021
-7.25%
May 23, 2003 - Feb 12, 2004
#12-0.46%
May 1, 2026 - May 5, 2026
-6.95%
Aug 18, 2016 - Jan 31, 2019
#13-0.40%
May 11, 2026 - May 13, 2026
-6.19%
Nov 14, 2007 - Jan 15, 2008
#14-0.19%
Apr 22, 2026 - Apr 24, 2026
-6.19%
Nov 3, 1999 - Apr 10, 2000
#15-0.16%
May 6, 2026 - May 8, 2026
-6.15%
Nov 2, 2001 - Feb 11, 2002

Correlation

Correlation between CLSM and MGF is 0.76 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.76
-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

CLSM vs MGF dividend yield comparison.

YearCLSMMGF
20260.00%3.35%
20250.90%7.65%
20242.13%7.80%
20232.58%7.82%
20223.17%8.44%
20210.59%7.71%
20200.00%7.58%
20190.00%7.50%
20180.00%7.81%
20170.00%7.92%
20160.00%8.10%
20150.00%8.05%
20140.00%7.85%
20130.00%8.24%
20120.00%7.37%
20110.00%7.33%
20100.00%7.69%
20090.00%6.96%
20080.00%6.57%
20070.00%5.92%
20060.00%5.43%
20050.00%5.00%
20040.00%4.86%
20030.00%5.25%
20020.00%6.10%
20010.00%6.50%
20000.00%3.05%

Select Stocks to Compare