CLS vs CCJ

Comparison between Celestica Inc (CLS, Company) and Cameco Corp (CCJ, Company).

CLS is from the Technology sector, while CCJ is from the Energy sector.

5-Year PerformanceCLS has outperformed CCJ, delivering a return of +115.4% compared to +40.0%

CLS vs CCJ - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	CLS(COMPANY)	CCJ(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$42B	$41B
Max Drawdown	96.93%	90.11%
Sharpe Ratio	1.87	0.97
5Y Beta	2.42	1.51
Industry	Electronic Components	Uranium
P/E Ratio	53.74	87.16
Forward P/E	38.17	90.09
PEG Ratio	1.00	0.51
Dividend Yield	N/A	0.24%
5Y Dividends CAGR	N/A	23.04%
Debt to Equity	0.00%	14.11%
Free Cash Flow Yield	2.12%	1.59%
P/S Ratio	3.10	12.59
P/B Ratio	20.37	8.79

Market Cap

Winner

CLS

$42B

CCJ

$41B

Max Drawdown

CLS

96.93%

Winner

CCJ

90.11%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

CLS

1.87

CCJ

0.97

5Y Beta

CLS

2.42

Winner

CCJ

1.51

Industry

CLS

Electronic Components

CCJ

Uranium

P/E Ratio

Winner

CLS

53.74

CCJ

87.16

Forward P/E

Winner

CLS

38.17

CCJ

90.09

PEG Ratio

CLS

1.00

Winner

CCJ

0.51

Dividend Yield

CLS

N/A

CCJ

0.24%

5Y Dividends CAGR

CLS

N/A

CCJ

23.04%

Debt to Equity

Winner

CLS

0.00%

CCJ

14.11%

Free Cash Flow Yield

Winner

CLS

2.12%

CCJ

1.59%

P/S Ratio

Winner

CLS

3.10

CCJ

12.59

P/B Ratio

CLS

20.37

Winner

CCJ

8.79

CLS vs CCJ - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	CLS	CCJ
1 month	+6.55%	+0.34%
3 months	+41.21%	-2.20%
6 months	+32.25%	+23.93%
1 year	+197.89%	+55.84%
5 years(CAGR)	+115.42%	+40.04%
10 years(CAGR)	+43.46%	+26.65%
Max(CAGR)	+10.20%	+16.32%

Winner

CLS

+6.55%

CCJ

+0.34%

Winner

CLS

+41.21%

CCJ

-2.20%

Winner

CLS

+32.25%

CCJ

+23.93%

Winner

CLS

+197.89%

CCJ

+55.84%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

CLS

+115.42%

CCJ

+40.04%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

CLS

+43.46%

CCJ

+26.65%

Max(CAGR)

CLS

+10.20%

Winner

CCJ

+16.32%

CLS vs CCJ - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	CLS	CCJ
2026	+26.33%	+9.46%
2025	+217.62%	+75.75%
2024	+226.49%	+22.48%
2023	+157.97%	+88.26%
2022	+0.54%	+0.21%
2021	+40.71%	+63.29%
2020	-3.12%	+50.79%
2019	-6.45%	-21.36%
2018	-17.26%	+17.72%
2017	-10.96%	-7.65%
2016	+8.62%	-9.70%
2015	-5.97%	-22.35%
2014	+13.76%	-17.55%
2013	+23.52%	+4.77%
2012	+6.54%	+7.12%
2011	-25.66%	-54.76%
2010	-1.22%	+22.69%
2009	+98.74%	+67.88%
2008	-20.38%	-57.86%
2007	-24.77%	+1.71%
2006	-26.39%	+19.51%
2005	-24.46%	+91.08%
2004	-8.97%	+79.66%
2003	-0.13%	+139.47%
2002	-65.90%	-0.58%
2001	-18.50%	+46.91%
2000	+1.88%	+19.86%
1999	+93.04%	-9.23%

CLS vs CCJ Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CLS was -96.93%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 6049 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for CCJ was -87.53%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 4132 trading sessions.

The current CLS drawdown is -19.13%. The current CCJ drawdown is -19.55%.

Rank	CLS	CCJ
#1	-96.93% Oct 20, 2000 - Nov 7, 2024	-87.53% Jun 15, 2007 - Nov 13, 2023
#2	-53.96% Feb 5, 2025 - Jun 24, 2025	-47.40% Mar 6, 2002 - Jun 2, 2003
#3	-36.73% Mar 17, 2000 - Jul 14, 2000	-40.14% Nov 2, 1999 - Dec 8, 2000
#4	-33.23% Dec 29, 1999 - Mar 17, 2000	-40.01% Dec 5, 2024 - Jun 9, 2025
#5	-29.24% Nov 5, 2025 - Apr 13, 2026	-33.53% May 31, 2024 - Oct 16, 2024
#6	-29.13% Jan 22, 2025 - Jan 31, 2025	-30.79% May 21, 2001 - Feb 8, 2002
#7	-24.63% Sep 5, 2000 - Oct 20, 2000	-29.13% Jan 28, 2026 - Jun 10, 2026
#8	-23.18% Jun 2, 2026 - Jun 10, 2026	-28.35% May 10, 2006 - Apr 4, 2007
#9	-19.68% Apr 27, 2026 - Jun 1, 2026	-27.84% Jan 5, 2004 - Jul 14, 2004
#10	-15.04% Aug 12, 2025 - Sep 4, 2025	-25.69% Oct 28, 2025 - Jan 9, 2026
#11	-13.67% Jul 20, 2000 - Aug 17, 2000	-24.56% Mar 18, 2005 - Jul 19, 2005
#12	-12.63% Dec 13, 1999 - Dec 17, 1999	-21.74% Feb 1, 2024 - May 6, 2024
#13	-9.30% Sep 23, 2025 - Oct 9, 2025	-15.25% Jan 31, 2006 - Apr 17, 2006
#14	-9.06% Nov 21, 2024 - Dec 5, 2024	-14.91% Dec 12, 2000 - Jan 9, 2001
#15	-7.23% Dec 6, 2024 - Dec 13, 2024	-14.21% Oct 4, 2005 - Nov 21, 2005