CLMB vs NATR
Comparison between Climb Global Solutions Inc (CLMB, Company) and Nature`s Sunshine Products Inc (NATR, Company).
CLMB is from the Technology sector, while NATR is from the Consumer Defensive sector.
5-Year PerformanceCLMB has outperformed NATR, delivering a return of +28.4% compared to -0.6%
CLMB vs NATR - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CLMB vs NATR - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CLMB vs NATR - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CLMB | NATR |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -5.22% | -5.63% |
| 2025 | -17.21% | +48.21% |
| 2024 | +137.78% | -17.36% |
| 2023 | +68.96% | +102.70% |
| 2022 | -6.10% | -55.67% |
| 2021 | +92.16% | +34.86% |
| 2020 | +22.67% | +65.38% |
| 2019 | +68.72% | +7.72% |
| 2018 | -37.22% | -29.74% |
| 2017 | -2.88% | -19.82% |
| 2016 | +6.04% | +56.64% |
| 2015 | +7.81% | -28.91% |
| 2014 | +30.29% | -7.84% |
| 2013 | +26.66% | +28.61% |
| 2012 | -2.08% | -10.41% |
| 2011 | +13.52% | +74.77% |
| 2010 | +50.71% | +11.41% |
| 2009 | +16.57% | +162.77% |
| 2008 | -15.93% | N/A |
| 2007 | -39.76% | N/A |
| 2006 | +33.69% | N/A |
| 2005 | -11.71% | N/A |
| 2004 | +126.86% | N/A |
| 2003 | +276.07% | N/A |
| 2002 | -29.62% | N/A |
| 2001 | +0.45% | N/A |
| 2000 | -62.03% | N/A |
| 1999 | +19.61% | N/A |
CLMB vs NATR Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CLMB was -75.74%, occurring on Oct 9, 2002. Recovery took 967 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for NATR was -62.20%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 1789 trading sessions.
The current CLMB drawdown is -33.45%. The current NATR drawdown is -28.81%.
| Rank | CLMB | NATR |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -75.74% Dec 31, 1999 - Nov 6, 2003 | -62.20% Nov 26, 2013 - Jan 6, 2021 |
| #2 | -70.95% Jul 17, 2007 - Feb 8, 2011 | -61.61% May 6, 2021 - Nov 14, 2025 |
| #3 | -53.40% Oct 6, 2025 - Apr 30, 2026 | -44.44% May 3, 2010 - May 31, 2011 |
| #4 | -49.48% Apr 28, 2017 - May 11, 2020 | -38.45% Jul 21, 2011 - Aug 12, 2013 |
| #5 | -44.50% Mar 7, 2005 - Jul 12, 2006 | -29.21% Mar 2, 2026 - Jun 4, 2026 |
| #6 | -36.96% May 31, 2011 - Apr 10, 2012 | -26.26% Oct 23, 2009 - Dec 23, 2009 |
| #7 | -34.82% Apr 8, 2014 - Apr 28, 2017 | -18.83% Dec 24, 2009 - Apr 12, 2010 |
| #8 | -33.98% Apr 25, 2012 - Feb 10, 2014 | -13.64% Jun 29, 2009 - Aug 26, 2009 |
| #9 | -33.01% May 27, 2022 - Feb 15, 2023 | -9.73% Dec 15, 2025 - Jan 16, 2026 |
| #10 | -30.81% Nov 22, 2024 - Sep 23, 2025 | -9.60% Oct 29, 2013 - Nov 26, 2013 |
| #11 | -30.23% Aug 12, 2020 - May 5, 2021 | -9.32% Oct 6, 2009 - Oct 8, 2009 |
| #12 | -28.36% Mar 1, 2024 - Aug 7, 2024 | -8.60% Jan 6, 2021 - Feb 1, 2021 |
| #13 | -27.84% Mar 31, 2023 - Dec 8, 2023 | -8.40% Oct 8, 2009 - Oct 13, 2009 |
| #14 | -21.55% Dec 23, 2021 - Mar 17, 2022 | -8.34% Feb 12, 2021 - Mar 11, 2021 |
| #15 | -19.13% Jun 2, 2021 - Nov 4, 2021 | -8.18% Apr 15, 2010 - Apr 23, 2010 |
Correlation
Correlation between CLMB and NATR is 0.59 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2003 - 2025)
CLMB vs NATR dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CLMB | NATR |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.66% | 0.00% |
| 2024 | 0.67% | 0.00% |
| 2023 | 1.24% | 0.00% |
| 2022 | 2.16% | 0.00% |
| 2021 | 1.94% | 5.41% |
| 2020 | 3.56% | 0.00% |
| 2019 | 4.20% | 0.00% |
| 2018 | 6.80% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 4.07% | 0.87% |
| 2016 | 3.64% | 2.67% |
| 2015 | 3.71% | 3.95% |
| 2014 | 3.95% | 12.82% |
| 2013 | 4.80% | 10.97% |
| 2012 | 5.77% | 1.04% |
| 2011 | 5.25% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 5.42% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 7.55% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 8.57% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 4.89% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 3.57% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 4.11% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 2.91% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 5.81% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks